Literature DB >> 19775273

Estimating the density of honeybee colonies across their natural range to fill the gap in pollinator decline censuses.

Rodolfo Jaffé1, Vincent Dietemann, Mike H Allsopp, Cecilia Costa, Robin M Crewe, Raffaele Dall'olio, Pilar DE LA Rúa, Mogbel A A El-Niweiri, Ingemar Fries, Nikola Kezic, Michael S Meusel, Robert J Paxton, Taher Shaibi, Eckart Stolle, Robin F A Moritz.   

Abstract

Although pollinator declines are a global biodiversity threat, the demography of the western honeybee (Apis mellifera) has not been considered by conservationists because it is biased by the activity of beekeepers. To fill this gap in pollinator decline censuses and to provide a broad picture of the current status of honeybees across their natural range, we used microsatellite genetic markers to estimate colony densities and genetic diversity at different locations in Europe, Africa, and central Asia that had different patterns of land use. Genetic diversity and colony densities were highest in South Africa and lowest in Northern Europe and were correlated with mean annual temperature. Confounding factors not related to climate, however, are also likely to influence genetic diversity and colony densities in honeybee populations. Land use showed a significantly negative influence over genetic diversity and the density of honeybee colonies over all sampling locations. In Europe honeybees sampled in nature reserves had genetic diversity and colony densities similar to those sampled in agricultural landscapes, which suggests that the former are not wild but may have come from managed hives. Other results also support this idea: putative wild bees were rare in our European samples, and the mean estimated density of honeybee colonies on the continent closely resembled the reported mean number of managed hives. Current densities of European honeybee populations are in the same range as those found in the adverse climatic conditions of the Kalahari and Saharan deserts, which suggests that beekeeping activities do not compensate for the loss of wild colonies. Our findings highlight the importance of reconsidering the conservation status of honeybees in Europe and of regarding beekeeping not only as a profitable business for producing honey, but also as an essential component of biodiversity conservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19775273     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  29 in total

1.  A worldwide survey of genome sequence variation provides insight into the evolutionary history of the honeybee Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Andreas Wallberg; Fan Han; Gustaf Wellhagen; Bjørn Dahle; Masakado Kawata; Nizar Haddad; Zilá Luz Paulino Simões; Mike H Allsopp; Irfan Kandemir; Pilar De la Rúa; Christian W Pirk; Matthew T Webster
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts.

Authors:  Denise Margaret S Matias; Julia Leventon; Anna-Lena Rau; Christian Borgemeister; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Experimental evidence that honeybees depress wild insect densities in a flowering crop.

Authors:  Sandra A M Lindström; Lina Herbertsson; Maj Rundlöf; Riccardo Bommarco; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The New Zealand experience of varroa invasion highlights research opportunities for Australia.

Authors:  Jay M Iwasaki; Barbara I P Barratt; Janice M Lord; Alison R Mercer; Katharine J M Dickinson
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Urban ecosystem drives genetic diversity in feral honey bee.

Authors:  Aleksandra Patenković; Marija Tanasković; Pavle Erić; Katarina Erić; Milica Mihajlović; Ljubiša Stanisavljević; Slobodan Davidović
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Firewalls in bee nests-survival value of propolis walls of wild Cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis).

Authors:  Geoff Tribe; Jürgen Tautz; Karin Sternberg; Jenny Cullinan
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.

Authors:  Eckart Stolle; Jonathan H Kidner; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Bees for development: Brazilian survey reveals how to optimize stingless beekeeping.

Authors:  Rodolfo Jaffé; Nathaniel Pope; Airton Torres Carvalho; Ulysses Madureira Maia; Betina Blochtein; Carlos Alfredo Lopes de Carvalho; Gislene Almeida Carvalho-Zilse; Breno Magalhães Freitas; Cristiano Menezes; Márcia de Fátima Ribeiro; Giorgio Cristino Venturieri; Vera Lucia Imperatriz-Fonseca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adaptive population structure shifts in invasive parasitic mites, Varroa destructor.

Authors:  Arrigo Moro; Tjeerd Blacquière; Bjørn Dahle; Vincent Dietemann; Yves Le Conte; Barbara Locke; Peter Neumann; Alexis Beaurepaire
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Spatial and temporal trends of global pollination benefit.

Authors:  Sven Lautenbach; Ralf Seppelt; Juliane Liebscher; Carsten F Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.