Literature DB >> 19774326

Water consumption in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline.

May Wu1, Marianne Mintz, Michael Wang, Salil Arora.   

Abstract

We assessed current water consumption during liquid fuel production, evaluating major steps of fuel lifecycle for five fuel pathways: bioethanol from corn, bioethanol from cellulosic feedstocks, gasoline from U.S. conventional crude obtained from onshore wells, gasoline from Saudi Arabian crude, and gasoline from Canadian oil sands. Our analysis revealed that the amount of irrigation water used to grow biofuel feedstocks varies significantly from one region to another and that water consumption for biofuel production varies with processing technology. In oil exploration and production, water consumption depends on the source and location of crude, the recovery technology, and the amount of produced water re-injected for oil recovery. Our results also indicate that crop irrigation is the most important factor determining water consumption in the production of corn ethanol. Nearly 70% of U.S. corn used for ethanol is produced in regions where 10-17 liters of water are consumed to produce one liter of ethanol. Ethanol production plants are less water intensive and there is a downward trend in water consumption. Water requirements for switchgrass ethanol production vary from 1.9 to 9.8 liters for each liter of ethanol produced. We found that water is consumed at a rate of 2.8-6.6 liters for each liter of gasoline produced for more than 90% of crude oil obtained from conventional onshore sources in the U.S. and more than half of crude oil imported from Saudi Arabia. For more than 55% of crude oil from Canadian oil sands, about 5.2 liters of water are consumed for each liter of gasoline produced. Our analysis highlighted the vital importance of water management during the feedstock production and conversion stage of the fuel lifecycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19774326     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9370-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  2 in total

1.  The water intensity of the plugged-in automotive economy.

Authors:  Carey W King; Michael E Webber
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Chiu; Brian Walseth; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total
  10 in total

1.  Global impacts of energy demand on the freshwater resources of nations.

Authors:  Robert Alan Holland; Kate A Scott; Martina Flörke; Gareth Brown; Robert M Ewers; Elizabeth Farmer; Valerie Kapos; Ann Muggeridge; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Gail Taylor; John Barrett; Felix Eigenbrod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Environmental indicators of biofuel sustainability: what about context?

Authors:  Rebecca A Efroymson; Virginia H Dale; Keith L Kline; Allen C McBride; Jeffrey M Bielicki; Raymond L Smith; Esther S Parish; Peter E Schweizer; Denice M Shaw
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Coproduction of acetaldehyde and hydrogen during glucose fermentation by Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Huilin Zhu; Ramon Gonzalez; Thomas A Bobik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Replacing process water and nitrogen sources with biogas slurry during cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Yang You; Bo Wu; Yi-Wei Yang; Yan-Wei Wang; Song Liu; Qi-Li Zhu; Han Qin; Fu-Rong Tan; Zhi-Yong Ruan; Ke-Dong Ma; Li-Chun Dai; Min Zhang; Guo-Quan Hu; Ming-Xiong He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Water impacts of U.S. biofuels: Insights from an assessment combining economic and biophysical models.

Authors:  Jacob Teter; Sonia Yeh; Madhu Khanna; Göran Berndes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Replacing water and nutrients for ethanol production by ARTP derived biogas slurry tolerant Zymomonas mobilis strain.

Authors:  Guowei Duan; Bo Wu; Han Qin; Weiting Wang; Qiong Tan; Yonghua Dai; Yao Qin; Furong Tan; Guoquan Hu; Mingxiong He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence.

Authors:  Tévécia Ronzon; Ana I Sanjuán
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 9.297

Review 9.  Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security.

Authors:  Selena Ahmed; Teresa Warne; Erin Smith; Hannah Goemann; Greta Linse; Mark Greenwood; Jeremy Kedziora; Meghan Sapp; Debra Kraner; Kelli Roemer; Julia H Haggerty; Meghann Jarchow; David Swanson; Benjamin Poulter; Paul C Stoy
Journal:  NPJ Sci Food       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Energy, water and fish: biodiversity impacts of energy-sector water demand in the United States depend on efficiency and policy measures.

Authors:  Robert I McDonald; Julian D Olden; Jeffrey J Opperman; William M Miller; Joseph Fargione; Carmen Revenga; Jonathan V Higgins; Jimmie Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.