Literature DB >> 19774301

Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review.

Anna-Liisa Salminen1, Ase Brandt, Kersti Samuelsson, Outi Töytäri, Antti Malmivaara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of mobility device interventions in terms of activity and participation for people with mobility limitations.
DESIGN: Systematic review. Search of 7 databases during the period 1996 to 2008.
METHODS: Controlled studies and non-controlled follow-up studies were included if they covered both baseline and follow-up data and focused on activity and participation. Study participants had to be aged over 18 years with mobility limitations. Mobility device interventions encompassed crutches, walking frames, rollators, manual wheelchairs and powered wheelchairs (including scooter types). Two reviewers independently selected the studies, performed the data extraction, and 4 reviewers assessed the studies' methodological quality. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
RESULTS: Eight studies were included: one randomized controlled trial, 4 controlled studies, and 3 follow-up studies that included before and after data. Two studies dealt with the effects of powered wheelchair interventions and the other studies with various other types of mobility device. Two studies were of high, internal and external methodological quality. Interventions were found to be clinically effective in terms of activity and participation in 6 studies. The results did not, however, give a unanimous verdict on the effectiveness of mobility devices in enhancing the activity and participation of mobility impaired people.
CONCLUSION: Interventions and outcome measurement methods varied between the studies; consequently, it was not possible to draw any general conclusions about the effectiveness of mobility device interventions. However, evidence was found that mobility devices improve users' activity and participation and increase mobility. A lack of high-quality research hampers conclusions about effectiveness. More original, well-designed research is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19774301     DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  38 in total

1.  Effectiveness of a Wheelchair Skills Training Program for Powered Wheelchair Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  R Lee Kirby; William C Miller; Francois Routhier; Louise Demers; Alex Mihailidis; Jan Miller Polgar; Paula W Rushton; Laura Titus; Cher Smith; Mike McAllister; Chris Theriault; Kara Thompson; Bonita Sawatzky
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users.

Authors:  Emma M Smith; Brodie M Sakakibara; William C Miller
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2014-12-04

Review 3.  Automatic Detection and Classification of Unsafe Events During Power Wheelchair Use.

Authors:  Joelle Pineau; Athena K Moghaddam; Hiu Kim Yuen; Philippe S Archambault; François Routhier; François Michaud; Patrick Boissy
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Effect of uphill and downhill walking on walking performance in geriatric patients using a wheeled walker.

Authors:  Ulrich Lindemann; Michael Schwenk; Syn Schmitt; Michael Weyrich; Wolfgang Schlicht; Clemens Becker
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 1.281

5.  Consumer Feedback to Steer the Future of Assistive Technology Research and Development: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Annmarie Kelleher; Brad E Dicianno; Stacy Eckstein; Richard Schein; Jonathan Pearlman; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

6.  The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.

Authors:  Brad E Dicianno; James Joseph; Stacy Eckstein; Christina K Zigler; Eleanor J Quinby; Mark R Schmeler; Richard M Schein; Jon Pearlman; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2018-03-20

7.  Assistive walking device use and knee osteoarthritis: results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study (Health ABC Study).

Authors:  Laura D Carbone; Suzanne Satterfield; Caiqin Liu; Kent C Kwoh; Tuhina Neogi; Elizabeth Tolley; Michael Nevitt
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Mobility Device Use and Mobility Disability in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Cancer History.

Authors:  Shirley M Bluethmann; Eileen Flores; Grace Campbell; Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology.

Authors:  Brad E Dicianno; James Joseph; Stacy Eckstein; Christina K Zigler; Eleanor Quinby; Mark R Schmeler; Richard M Schein; Jon Pearlman; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Need and use of assistive devices for personal mobility by individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jordanne Florio; Ursina Arnet; Armin Gemperli; Timo Hinrichs
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.