Literature DB >> 19774096

A deformable model for tracking tumors across consecutive imaging studies.

Gabriela Niculescu1, John L Nosher, M D Benjamin Schneider, David J Foran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A deformable registration technique was developed and evaluated to track and quantify tumor response to radiofrequency ablation for patients with liver malignancies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The method uses the combined power of global and local alignment of pre- and post-treatment computed tomography image data sets. The strategy of the algorithm is to infer volumetric deformation based upon surface displacements using a linearly elastic finite element model (FEM). Using this framework, the major challenge for tracking tumor location is not the tissue mechanical properties for FEM modeling but rather the evaluation of boundary conditions. Three different methods were systematically investigated to automatically determine the boundary conditions defined by the correspondences on liver surfaces.
RESULTS: Using both 2D synthetic phantoms and imaged 3D beef liver data we performed gold standard registration while measuring the accuracy of non-rigid deformation. The fact that the algorithms could support mean displacement error of tumor deformation up to 2 mm indicates that this technique may serve as a useful tool for surgical interventions. The method was further demonstrated and evaluated using consecutive imaging studies for three liver cancer patients.
CONCLUSION: The FEM-based surface registration technique provides accurate tracking and monitoring of tumor and surrounding tissue during the course of treatment and follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deformable registration; Finite element modeling; Radiofrequency ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19774096      PMCID: PMC2747734          DOI: 10.1007/s11548-009-0298-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  8 in total

1.  Semiautomatic 3-D image registration as applied to interventional MRI liver cancer treatment.

Authors:  A Carrillo; J L Duerk; J S Lewin; D L Wilson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Image-guided radiofrequency tumor ablation: challenges and opportunities--part I.

Authors:  S Nahum Goldberg; D E Dupuy
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors:  J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  Registration accuracy and possible migration of internal fiducial gold marker implanted in prostate and liver treated with real-time tumor-tracking radiation therapy (RTRT).

Authors:  Kei Kitamura; Hiroki Shirato; Shinichi Shimizu; Nobuo Shinohara; Toru Harabayashi; Tadashi Shimizu; Yoshihisa Kodama; Hideho Endo; Rikiya Onimaru; Seiko Nishioka; Hidefumi Aoyama; Kazuhiko Tsuchiya; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Liver registration for the follow-up of hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Arnaud Charnoz; Vincent Agnus; Grégoire Malandain; Clément Forest; Mohamed Tajine; Luc Soler
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions.

Authors:  T Livraghi; S N Goldberg; S Lazzaroni; F Meloni; T Ierace; L Solbiati; G S Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment success as defined by histologic examination of the explanted liver.

Authors:  David S K Lu; Nam C Yu; Steven S Raman; Piyaporn Limanond; Charles Lassman; Kathryn Murray; Myron J Tong; Rafael G Amado; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Results after nonsurgical local treatment of primary liver malignancies.

Authors:  G M Hargreaves; R Adam; H Bismuth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.445

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Impact of errors in experimental parameters on reconstructed breast images using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Mats Lundqvist; Qianqian Fang; Stefan A Carp
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  A novel approach for local abdominal aortic aneurysm growth quantification.

Authors:  Eleni Metaxa; Iordan Iordanov; Emmanuel Maravelakis; Yannis Papaharilaou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.