J-F Lemay1, S Nadeau. 1. Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. jf.lemay@umontreal.ca
Abstract
STUDY DESIGNS: Longitudinal and correlational study with repeated measures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for a spinal cord injury (SCI) population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 32 individuals with an ASIA D SCI walking 10 m independently, with or without walking assistive devices. SETTING: An intensive rehabilitation center in Montréal, Canada. METHODS: Subjects were evaluated on the BBS, the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI), the 10-m walk test (10MWT) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). Individuals were reassessed during rehabilitation when progressing to a device providing less support or to unassisted gait. RESULTS: All walking tests were highly correlated with the BBS (0.714<Rs<0.816, P<or=0.01). A significant ceiling effect was found on the BBS, the WISCI and on most subsections of the SCI-FAI. Assistive devices used for walking relate well to the BBS score (Spearman's rho 0.714, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The BBS is an appropriate assessment of standing balance for individuals with SCI. Complementary evaluation with the 10MWT or the 2MWT is recommended to supplement the ceiling effect on the BBS.
STUDY DESIGNS: Longitudinal and correlational study with repeated measures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for a spinal cord injury (SCI) population. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 32 individuals with an ASIA D SCI walking 10 m independently, with or without walking assistive devices. SETTING: An intensive rehabilitation center in Montréal, Canada. METHODS: Subjects were evaluated on the BBS, the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI II), the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI), the 10-m walk test (10MWT) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG). Individuals were reassessed during rehabilitation when progressing to a device providing less support or to unassisted gait. RESULTS: All walking tests were highly correlated with the BBS (0.714<Rs<0.816, P<or=0.01). A significant ceiling effect was found on the BBS, the WISCI and on most subsections of the SCI-FAI. Assistive devices used for walking relate well to the BBS score (Spearman's rho 0.714, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The BBS is an appropriate assessment of standing balance for individuals with SCI. Complementary evaluation with the 10MWT or the 2MWT is recommended to supplement the ceiling effect on the BBS.
Authors: Jaynie F Yang; Jonathan Norton; Jennifer Nevett-Duchcherer; Francois D Roy; Douglas P Gross; Monica A Gorassini Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2011-04-21
Authors: Noam Y Harel; Pierre K Asselin; Drew B Fineberg; Thomas J Pisano; William A Bauman; Ann M Spungen Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Andresa R Marinho-Buzelli; Hossein Rouhani; Beverley Catharine Craven; Kei Masani; José Angelo Barela; Milos R Popovic; Mary C Verrier Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2019-01-17
Authors: Jennifer L Moore; Kirsten Potter; Kathleen Blankshain; Sandra L Kaplan; Linda C OʼDwyer; Jane E Sullivan Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.649