Literature DB >> 19773749

Efficacy of an endo-knife with a water-jet function (Flushknife) for endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial colorectal neoplasms.

Yoji Takeuchi1, Noriya Uedo, Ryu Ishihara, Hiroyasu Iishi, Takashi Kizu, Takuya Inoue, Rika Chatani, Noboru Hanaoka, Tomoyasu Taniguchi, Natsuko Kawada, Koji Higashino, Toshio Shimokawa, Masaharu Tatsuta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently not a common treatment for colorectal neoplasms because it is time consuming and technically difficult. Flushknife--an electrosurgical endo-knife with a water-jet function--is expected to reduce the difficulty of colorectal ESD. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a water-jet function for colorectal ESD.
METHODS: This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at a cancer referral center. A total of 49 patients, with a total of 51 superficial colorectal neoplasms (median tumor size of 30 mm), were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using either the Flexknife (electrosurgical endo-knife without a water-jet function) or the Flushknife. Tumors were resected by ESD using each endo-knife. The procedures were conducted by two endoscopists. Operation time was defined as the main outcome measure.
RESULTS: En bloc resection was achieved in 23 out of 26 (88%) lesions in the Flexknife group and in 24 out of 24 (100%) lesions in the Flushknife group. The mean operation time (95% confidence interval) was 87.3 (71.3-103.4) min in the Flexknife group and 61.0 (49.3-72.7) min in the Flushknife group (P=0.02). The Flushknife reduced the number of endoscopic device changes (P=0.001), the number of submucosal injections (P=0.001), and the mean amount of injected hyaluronate sodium (P=0.001) compared with the Flexknife. No severe adverse events were observed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Without increasing adverse events, the endo-knife with a water-jet function efficiently reduced the operation time of colorectal ESD in patients with large superficial colorectal neoplasms. (University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry number UMIN000001302).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19773749     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2009.547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  31 in total

Review 1.  Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Yuji Naito; Toshikazu Yoshikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Possibility of ex vivo animal training model for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Yutaka Inada; Munehiro Kugai; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiro Katada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Takeshi Ishikawa; Tomohisa Takagi; Osamu Handa; Hideyuki Konishi; Satoshi Kokura; Ken Inoue; Naoki Wakabayashi; Yasuhisa Abe; Akio Yanagisawa; Yuji Naito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Yutaka Saito; Taku Sakamoto; Nozomu Kobayashi; Naoto Sakamoto; Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Keiko Niimi; Tomohiko Ohya; Ken Ohata; Shinichi Okamura; Shinei Iizuka; Yoji Takeuchi; Noriya Uedo; Pietro Fusaroli; Marco Augusto Bonino; Mauro Verra; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of formal training in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

6.  Comparison of synchronous dual wavelength diode laser versus conventional endo-knives for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: an animal study.

Authors:  Jian Tang; Shufang Ye; Xueliang Ji; Jun Li; Feng Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas R McCarty; Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi; Kelly E Hathorn; Christopher C Thompson; Hiroyuki Aihara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Recent technical advances for safe and successful procedures.

Authors:  Katsumi Yamamoto; Tomoki Michida; Tsutomu Nishida; Shiro Hayashi; Masafumi Naito; Toshifumi Ito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-10

9.  Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Sho Suzuki; Akiko Chino; Teruhito Kishihara; Naoyuki Uragami; Yoshiro Tamegai; Takanori Suganuma; Junko Fujisaki; Masaaki Matsuura; Takao Itoi; Takuji Gotoda; Masahiro Igarashi; Fuminori Moriyasu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Delayed Bleeding After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: When Is Emergency Colonoscopy Needed?

Authors:  Hideyuki Chiba; Ken Ohata; Jun Tachikawa; Jun Arimoto; Keiichi Ashikari; Hiroki Kuwabara; Michiko Nakaoka; Toru Goto; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.