| Literature DB >> 19773390 |
Li-Wei Chien1, Miao-Hsiang Lin, Hsueh-Yu Chung, Chi-Feng Liu.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulations (TEAS) on body composition and heart rate variability (HRV) in postmenopausal women with obesity. In this prospective study, 49 postmenopausal women were recruited in Taiwan. Body composition was used as a screening test for obesity (percentage body fat > 30%, waist circumference > 80 cm). The experimental group (n = 24) received TEAS treatment 30 min twice per week for 12 weeks at the Zusanli (ST 36) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) acupoints. The control group (n = 25) did not receive any intervention. The study of HRV was analyzed by time (standard deviation of the normal-to-normal (NN) intervals (SDNN) and square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals (RMSSD) indices) and frequency domain methods. Power spectral components were obtained at low (LF) and high (HF) frequencies. Body composition and HRV values were measured at the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks. A total of 40 subjects completed this study. Waist circumference and percentage body fat in the experimental group (n = 20) were significantly less than those of the control group (n = 20) at the 8th and 12th weeks (all P < .05). Additionally, at the same time points, percentage lean body mass in the experimental group was significantly greater than that in the control group (P < .05). SDNN values increased significantly at the 4th and 8th weeks when compared with the control group (all P < .05). At 12 weeks, SDNN value was not significantly different from that of the control group (P = .105). TEAS treatment improves body composition, and has a transient effect on the HRV in postmenopausal women with obesity.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 19773390 PMCID: PMC3137740 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nep145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow chart of the distribution of the cohort study.
Characteristics of study subjects.
| Variables | Control ( | Experimental ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)a | 52.5 (48.0, 61.0) | 57.0 (49.0, 63.0) | .004* |
| Duration of menopause (years)a | 2.5 (1.0, 10.0) | 5.0 (1.0, 10.0) | .148 |
| Marriageb | 1.000 | ||
| Married | 20 (100.00) | 19 (95.00) | |
| Widow | 0 | 1 (5.00) | |
| Occupationb | .004* | ||
| No | 19 (95.00) | 11 (55.00) | |
| Yes | 1 (5.00) | 9 (45.00) | |
| Exerciseb | .457 | ||
| Never | 4 (20.00) | 1 (5.00) | |
| Occasional | 7 (35.00) | 8 (40.00) | |
| Regular | 9 (45.00) | 11 (55.00) | |
| Teab | .693 | ||
| No | 3 (15.00) | 4 (20.00) | |
| Occasional | 5 (25.00) | 7 (35.00) | |
| Frequently | 12 (60.00) | 9 (45.00) | |
| Coffeeb | .236 | ||
| No | 9 (45.00) | 7 (35.00) | |
| Occasional | 3 (15.00) | 8 (40.00) | |
| Frequently | 8 (40.00) | 5 (25.00) | |
| Medical historyb | .487 | ||
| No | 9 (45.00) | 5 (25.00) | |
| Yes | 11 (55.00) | 15 (75.00) | |
| Medicationsb | 1.000 | ||
| No | 14 (70.00) | 14 (70.00) | |
| Yes | 6 (30.00) | 6 (30.00) | |
| Health foodb | .465 | ||
| No | 6 (30.00) | 4 (20.00) | |
| Yes | 14 (70.00) | 16 (80.00) | |
| Stressb | .046* | ||
| Light | 14 (70.00) | 6 (30.00) | |
| Medium | 5 (25.00) | 9 (45.00) | |
| Heavy | 1 (5.00) | 5 (25.00) |
Data are presented as median (range) or number (%).
aMann-Whitney U-test was used; bChi-square test was used.
*Significantly different, P < .05.
Body composition of the two study groups by mixed model.
| Variables | Control ( | Experimental ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | |||
| Baseline | 64.52 ± 5.97 | 63.48 ± 4.90 | .752 |
| 4th week | 65.05 ± 6.11 | 62.93 ± 4.78 | .495 |
| 8th week | 65.46 ± 6.10 | 62.67 ± 4.66 | .219 |
| 12th week | 65.68 ± 6.01 | 62.40 ± 4.81 | .192 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | |||
| Baseline | 84.25 ± 3.55 | 84.25 ± 2.69 | .977 |
| 4th week | 84.93 ± 4.21 | 83.50 ± 2.61 | .525 |
| 8th week | 85.60 ± 3.76 | 82.80 ± 2.56 | .028* |
| 12th week | 85.78 ± 3.56 | 82.33 ± 2.75 | .006* |
| Hip circumference (cm) | |||
| Baseline | 101.15 ± 3.90 | 101.00 ± 3.40 | .732 |
| 4th week | 101.55 ± 4.16 | 100.45 ± 3.03 | .962 |
| 8th week | 102.33 ± 3.96 | 100.03 ± 3.16 | .264 |
| 12th week | 102.50 ± 4.05 | 99.80 ± 3.28 | .145 |
| Waist to hip ratio (%) | |||
| Baseline | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.03 | .676 |
| 4th week | 0.84 ± 0.03 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | .476 |
| 8th week | 0.84 ± 0.03 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | .096 |
| 12th week | 0.84 ± 0.03 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | .052 |
| Body fat (%) | |||
| Baseline | 35.51 ± 4.26 | 35.78 ± 4.23 | .600 |
| 4th week | 37.52 ± 5.04 | 34.88 ± 3.64 | .166 |
| 8th week | 38.69 ± 3.62 | 34.29 ± 3.52 | .002* |
| 12th week | 38.73 ± 3.60 | 33.33 ± 4.35 | <.001* |
| Lean body mass (%) | |||
| Baseline | 64.49 ± 4.26 | 64.23 ± 4.23 | .601 |
| 4th week | 62.52 ± 5.06 | 65.13 ± 3.64 | .172 |
| 8th week | 61.31 ± 3.62 | 65.72 ± 3.52 | .002* |
| 12th week | 61.27 ± 3.63 | 66.66 ± 4.34 | <.001* |
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Work, occupation, and stress were adjusted. Bonferroni correction with adjusted α-level (α′ = 0.05/3 = 0.0167) was used for multiple comparisons between each time point and the baseline. No difference between a time point and the baseline was found.
*Significantly different between two groups, P < .05.
Heart rate variability of the two study groups by mixed model.
| Variables | Control ( | Experimental ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | |||
| Baseline | 76.15 ± 11.71 | 75.95 ± 9.46 | .093 |
| 4th week | 75.20 ± 11.46† | 71.70 ± 10.00† | .399 |
| 8th week | 78.65 ± 12.17† | 71.30 ± 7.54† | .060 |
| 12th week | 75.75 ± 7.95† | 71.20 ± 7.14† | .331 |
| SDNN (ms) | |||
| Baseline | 27.74 ± 12.63 | 28.95 ± 11.04 | .609 |
| 4th week | 25.29 ± 12.32 | 42.51 ± 21.62† | .024* |
| 8th week | 25.40 ± 13.25 | 37.47 ± 12.90 | .029* |
| 12th week | 24.93 ± 12.75 | 37.84 ± 13.11 | .105 |
| RMSSD (ms) | |||
| Baseline | 28.44 ± 16.40 | 22.94 ± 17.02 | .079 |
| 4th week | 32.83 ± 24.97 | 19.48 ± 11.81 | .082 |
| 8th week | 27.68 ± 15.69 | 20.40 ± 16.21 | .125 |
| 12th week | 26.16 ± 11.84 | 20.61 ± 13.33 | .629 |
| Total power (ms2) | |||
| Baseline | 591.67 ± 479.69 | 830.37 ± 773.41 | .225 |
| 4th week | 589.58 ± 766.77 | 1837.12 ± 2060.79 | .049* |
| 8th week | 608.76 ± 761.64 | 1160.05 ± 866.09 | .066 |
| 12th week | 553.31 ± 610.40 | 1272.76 ± 1126.29 | .158 |
| LF (ms2) | |||
| Baseline | 177.61 ± 205.10 | 244.26 ± 270.26 | .409 |
| 4th week | 186.34 ± 434.22 | 498.67 ± 522.62 | .130 |
| 8th week | 157.74 ± 244.64 | 346.60 ± 336.71 | .114 |
| 12th week | 162.73 ± 233.30 | 433.18 ± 533.66 | .360 |
| HF (ms2) | |||
| Baseline | 161.50 ± 229.62 | 185.87 ± 265.58 | .643 |
| 4th week | 113.33 ± 159.14 | 266.32 ± 383.74 | .152 |
| 8th week | 150.99 ± 232.14 | 183.19 ± 161.47 | .420 |
| 12th week | 127.57 ± 157.84 | 161.13 ± 120.27 | .980 |
| LF nu | |||
| Baseline | 52.76 ± 25.30 | 57.22 ± 20.96 | .285 |
| 4th week | 64.04 ± 16.35 | 54.35 ± 16.58 | .441 |
| 8th week | 61.84 ± 18.12 | 55.28 ± 16.56 | .902 |
| 12th week | 61.94 ± 18.93 | 54.94 ± 16.24 | .725 |
| HF nu | |||
| Baseline | 47.24 ± 25.30 | 42.78 ± 20.96 | .285 |
| 4th week | 35.96 ± 16.35 | 45.65 ± 16.58 | .441 |
| 8th week | 38.16 ± 18.12 | 44.72 ± 19.75 | .902 |
| 12th week | 38.06 ± 19.83 | 45.06 ± 16.24 | .725 |
| LF/HF ratio | |||
| Baseline | 2.24 ± 2.36 | 2.47 ± 3.31 | .541 |
| 4th week | 1.56 ± 1.18 | 3.06 ± 3.70 | .299 |
| 8th week | 1.99 ± 2.37 | 2.62 ± 2.94 | .644 |
| 12th week | 1.50 ± 0.87 | 2.60 ± 2.37 | .345 |
HR, heart rate; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals; RMSSD, the square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals; LF, low frequency; HF, high frequency; LF nu, LF in normalized unit; HF nu, HF in normalized unit; Data were presented as mean ± SD. Work, occupation and working stress were adjusted. Bonferroni correction with adjusted α-level (α′ = 0.05/3 = 0.0167) was used for multiple comparisons between each time point and the baseline.
*Significantly different between two groups, P < .05; †Significantly different between the present time point and the baseline, P < .0167.