Literature DB >> 19773099

Birth after caesarean section: changes over a nine-year period in one Australian state.

Caroline S E Homer1, Rebecca Johnston, Maralyn J Foureur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: to describe the outcomes related to birth after a caesarean section (CS) in one Australian state, New South Wales (NSW), over a nine-year period. The objectives were to determine whether changes had occurred in the rates of attempted and successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), induction of labour, place of birth, admission to special care or neonatal intensive care nursery and perinatal mortality. DESIGN AND
SETTING: cross-sectional analytic study of hospital births in New South Wales using population-based data from 1998-2006. PARTICIPANTS: women experiencing the next birth after a CS where: the total number of previous CS was 1; the presentation at birth was vertex; it was a singleton pregnancy; and, the estimated gestational age was greater than or equal to 37 weeks. A total of 53,455 women met these criteria. MEASUREMENTS: data were obtained from NSW Health Department's Midwives Data Collection (MDC). The MDC includes all live births and stillbirths of at least 20 weeks gestation or 400g birth weight in the state.
FINDINGS: over the nine-year period, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section declined significantly (31-19%). The proportion of women who 'attempted a vaginal birth' also declined (49-35%). Of those women who laboured, the vaginal birth rate declined from 64% to 53%. Babies whose mothers 'attempted' a VBAC were significantly less likely to require admission to a special care nursery (SCN) or neonatal intensive care (NICU). The perinatal mortality rate in babies whose mothers 'attempted' a VBAC was higher than those babies born after an elective caesarean section although the absolute numbers are very small. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: rates of VBAC have declined over this nine-year period. Rates of neonatal mortality and proxy measures of morbidity (admission to a nursery) are generally in the low range for similar settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: decisions around the next birth after CS are complex. Efforts to keep the first birth normal and support women who have had a CS to have a normal birth need to be made. More research to predict which women are likely to achieve a successful VBAC and the most effective ways to facilitate a VBAC is essential. Midwives have a critical role to play in these endeavours.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19773099     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  7 in total

1.  Providers' perspectives on the vaginal birth after cesarean guidelines in Florida, United States: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kim J Cox
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Factors associated with preference for repeat cesarean in neyshabur pregnant women.

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Zahra Faraji; Pegah Lotfabadi; Zohre Foroozanfar; Mitra Rezaof; Abdolhalim Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09

3.  Indicators for mode of delivery in pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section: a retrospective study of 679 pregnant women.

Authors:  Zhifen Hua; Fadwa El Oualja
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Predicting the Relation between Biopsychosocial Factors and Type of Childbirth using the Decision Tree Method: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Saiedeh Sadat Hajimirzaie; Najmeh Tehranian; Seyed Abbas Mousavi; Amin Golabpour; Mehdi Mirzaii; Afsaneh Keramat; Ahmad Khosravi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2021-11

Review 5.  Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Maria A Quigley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Christopher G Fawsitt; Jane Bourke; Richard A Greene; Claire M Everard; Aileen Murphy; Jennifer E Lutomski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Does continuity of care impact decision making in the next birth after a caesarean section (VBAC)? a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Karyn Besley; Jennifer Bell; Deborah Davis; Jon Adams; Alison Porteous; Maralyn Foureur
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.