Literature DB >> 19772551

Quality of medication use in primary care--mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature.

Sara Garfield1, Nick Barber, Paul Walley, Alan Willson, Lina Eliasson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK, USA and the World Health Organization have identified improved patient safety in healthcare as a priority. Medication error has been identified as one of the most frequent forms of medical error and is associated with significant medical harm. Errors are the result of the systems that produce them. In industrial settings, a range of systematic techniques have been designed to reduce error and waste. The first stage of these processes is to map out the whole system and its reliability at each stage. However, to date, studies of medication error and solutions have concentrated on individual parts of the whole system. In this paper we wished to conduct a systematic review of the literature, in order to map out the medication system with its associated errors and failures in quality, to assess the strength of the evidence and to use approaches from quality management to identify ways in which the system could be made safer.
METHODS: We mapped out the medicines management system in primary care in the UK. We conducted a systematic literature review in order to refine our map of the system and to establish the quality of the research and reliability of the system.
RESULTS: The map demonstrated that the proportion of errors in the management system for medicines in primary care is very high. Several stages of the process had error rates of 50% or more: repeat prescribing reviews, interface prescribing and communication and patient adherence. When including the efficacy of the medicine in the system, the available evidence suggested that only between 4% and 21% of patients achieved the optimum benefit from their medication. Whilst there were some limitations in the evidence base, including the error rate measurement and the sampling strategies employed, there was sufficient information to indicate the ways in which the system could be improved, using management approaches. The first step to improving the overall quality would be routine monitoring of adherence, clinical effectiveness and hospital admissions.
CONCLUSION: By adopting the whole system approach from a management perspective we have found where failures in quality occur in medication use in primary care in the UK, and where weaknesses occur in the associated evidence base. Quality management approaches have allowed us to develop a coherent change and research agenda in order to tackle these, so far, fairly intractable problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19772551      PMCID: PMC2758894          DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-7-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


  22 in total

Review 1.  Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement.

Authors:  J C Benneyan; R C Lloyd; P E Plsek
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kelvin Jordan; Mark Porcheret; Peter Croft
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.267

3.  A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.

Authors:  A Hassey; D Gerrett; A Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-09

4.  Re-engineering pharmaceutical care: towards a patient-focused care approach.

Authors:  W M al-Shaqha; M Zairi
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv       Date:  2000

5.  The benefits of a hospital based community services liaison pharmacist.

Authors:  K Brookes; M G Scott; J B McConnell
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2000-04

6.  Primary non-compliance with prescribed medication in primary care.

Authors:  P H Beardon; M M McGilchrist; A D McKendrick; D G McDevitt; T M MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-02

7.  Investigation into the reasons for preventable drug related admissions to a medical admissions unit: observational study.

Authors:  R L Howard; A J Avery; P D Howard; M Partridge
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-08

Review 8.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.

Authors:  R B Haynes; E Ackloo; N Sahota; H P McDonald; X Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients.

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed; Sally James; Shaun Meakin; Chris Green; Andrew K Scott; Thomas J Walley; Keith Farrar; B Kevin Park; Alasdair M Breckenridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

10.  The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Mike Pringle; Ruth Cater; Alison Wynn; Vicky Hammersley; Carol Coupland; Rhydian Hapgood; Peter Horsfield; Sheila Teasdale; Christine Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28
View more
  23 in total

1.  Medication management capacity in relation to cognition and self-management skills in older people on polypharmacy.

Authors:  C G M Sino; M Sietzema; T C G Egberts; M J Schuurmans
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Cost effectiveness of a pharmacist-led information technology intervention for reducing rates of clinically important errors in medicines management in general practices (PINCER).

Authors:  Rachel A Elliott; Koen D Putman; Matthew Franklin; Lieven Annemans; Nick Verhaeghe; Martin Eden; Jasdeep Hayre; Sarah Rodgers; Aziz Sheikh; Anthony J Avery
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacists in primary care: a safe solution to the workforce crisis?

Authors:  Daoroong Komwong; Geva Greenfield; Hadar Zaman; Azeem Majeed; Benedict Hayhoe
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  [Tracing the map of medication errors outside the hospital environment in the Madrid Community].

Authors:  Belén Taravilla-Cerdán; Olga Larrubia-Muñoz; María de la Corte-García; Encarnación Cruz-Martos
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 5.  Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara Garfield; Sarah Clifford; Lina Eliasson; Nick Barber; Alan Willson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Receptionist input to quality and safety in repeat prescribing in UK general practice: ethnographic case study.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell; Michelle Myall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-03

7.  A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Anthony J Avery; Sarah Rodgers; Judith A Cantrill; Sarah Armstrong; Kathrin Cresswell; Martin Eden; Rachel A Elliott; Rachel Howard; Denise Kendrick; Caroline J Morris; Robin J Prescott; Glen Swanwick; Matthew Franklin; Koen Putman; Matthew Boyd; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A Qualitative Analysis of Outpatient Medication Use in Community Settings: Observed Safety Vulnerabilities and Recommendations for Improved Patient Safety.

Authors:  Helena C Lyson; Anjana E Sharma; Roy Cherian; Emily S Patterson; Kathryn M McDonald; Shin-Yu Lee; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  The association between pain intensity and the prescription of analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  S Muller; J Bedson; C D Mallen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  Developing the Diagnostic Adherence to Medication Scale (the DAMS) for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Sara Garfield; Lina Eliasson; Sarah Clifford; Alan Willson; Nick Barber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.