Literature DB >> 19772431

Accurate stochastic simulation via the step anticipation tau-leaping (SAL) algorithm.

Mary Sehl1, Alexander V Alekseyenko, Kenneth L Lange.   

Abstract

Stochastic simulation methods are important in modeling chemical reactions, and biological and physical stochastic processes describable as continuous-time discrete-state Markov chains with a finite number of reactant species and reactions. The current algorithm of choice, tau-leaping, achieves fast and accurate stochastic simulation by taking large time steps that leap over individual reactions. During a leap interval (t, t + tau) in tau-leaping, each reaction channel operates as a Poisson process with a constant intensity. We modify tau-leaping to allow linear and quadratic changes in reaction intensities. Because our version of tau-leaping accurately anticipates how intensities change over time, we propose calling it the step anticipation tau-leaping (SAL) algorithm. We apply SAL to four examples: Kendall's process, a two-type branching process, Ehrenfest's model of diffusion, and Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics. In each case, SAL is more accurate than ordinary tau-leaping. The degree of improvement varies with the situation. Near stochastic equilibrium, reaction intensities are roughly constant, and SAL and ordinary tau-leaping perform about equally well.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19772431      PMCID: PMC3148118          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  4 in total

1.  Avoiding negative populations in explicit Poisson tau-leaping.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Daniel T Gillespie; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A modified next reaction method for simulating chemical systems with time dependent propensities and delays.

Authors:  David F Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Daniel T Gillespie; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Incorporating postleap checks in tau-leaping.

Authors:  David F Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.488

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Extinction models for cancer stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Mary Sehl; Hua Zhou; Janet S Sinsheimer; Kenneth L Lange
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  BioSimulator.jl: Stochastic simulation in Julia.

Authors:  Alfonso Landeros; Timothy Stutz; Kevin L Keys; Alexander Alekseyenko; Janet S Sinsheimer; Kenneth Lange; Mary E Sehl
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Differential destruction of stem cells: implications for targeted cancer stem cell therapy.

Authors:  Mary E Sehl; Janet S Sinsheimer; Hua Zhou; Kenneth L Lange
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Inferring epidemiological dynamics with Bayesian coalescent inference: the merits of deterministic and stochastic models.

Authors:  Alex Popinga; Tim Vaughan; Tanja Stadler; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Modeling of Cancer Stem Cell State Transitions Predicts Therapeutic Response.

Authors:  Mary E Sehl; Miki Shimada; Alfonso Landeros; Kenneth Lange; Max S Wicha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A stochastic simulator of birth-death master equations with application to phylodynamics.

Authors:  Timothy G Vaughan; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Determining duration of HER2-targeted therapy using stem cell extinction models.

Authors:  Lindsay Riley; Hua Zhou; Kenneth Lange; Janet S Sinsheimer; Mary E Sehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.