Literature DB >> 19772355

Mutual exchange of kinetic properties by extended mutagenesis in two short LOV domain proteins from Pseudomonas putida.

Katrin Jentzsch1, Astrid Wirtz, Franco Circolone, Thomas Drepper, Aba Losi, Wolfgang Gärtner, Karl-Erich Jaeger, Ulrich Krauss.   

Abstract

We previously characterized a LOV protein PpSB2-LOV, present in the common soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida, that exhibits a plant phototropin LOV-like photochemistry [Krauss, U., Losi, A., Gartner, W., Jaeger, K. E., and Eggert, T. (2005) Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 2804-2811]. Now, we have identified a second LOV homologue, PpSB1-LOV, found in the same organism with approximately 66% identical amino acids. Both proteins consist of a conserved LOV core flanked by short N- and C-terminal extensions but lack a fused effector domain. Although both proteins are highly similar in sequence, they display drastically different dark recovery kinetics. At 20 degrees C, PpSB2-LOV reverts with an average time constant of 137 s from the photoequilibrium to the dark state, whereas PpSB1-LOV exhibits an average dark recovery time constant of 1.48 x 10(5) s. Irrespective of the significant differences in their dark recovery behavior, both proteins showed nearly identical kinetics for the photochemically induced adduct formation. In order to elucidate the structural and mechanistic basis of these extremely different dark recovery time constants, we performed a mutational analysis. Six amino acids in a distance of up to 6 A from the flavin chromophore, which differ between the two proteins, were identified and interchanged by site-directed mutagenesis. The amino acid substitution R66I located near the FMN phosphate in LOV domains was identified in PpSB1-LOV to accelerate the dark recovery by 2 orders of magnitude. Vice versa, the corresponding substitution I66R slowed down the dark recovery in PpSB2-LOV by a factor of 10. Interestingly, the interchange of the C-terminal extensions between the two proteins also had a pronounced effect on the dark recovery time constants, thus highlighting a coupling of these protein regions to the chromophore binding pocket.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19772355     DOI: 10.1021/bi901115z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  24 in total

1.  The amino-terminal helix modulates light-activated conformational changes in AsLOV2.

Authors:  Josiah P Zayner; Chloe Antoniou; Tobin R Sosnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  LOV domain-containing F-box proteins: light-dependent protein degradation modules in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Shogo Ito; Young Hun Song; Takato Imaizumi
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 13.164

3.  Kinetics of conformational changes of the FKF1-LOV domain upon photoexcitation.

Authors:  Yusuke Nakasone; Kazunori Zikihara; Satoru Tokutomi; Masahide Terazima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  In-cell infrared difference spectroscopy of LOV photoreceptors reveals structural responses to light altered in living cells.

Authors:  Lukas Goett-Zink; Jessica L Klocke; Lena A K Bögeholz; Tilman Kottke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Blue light regulated two-component systems: enzymatic and functional analyses of light-oxygen-voltage (LOV)-histidine kinases and downstream response regulators.

Authors:  Fernando Correa; Wen-Huang Ko; Victor Ocasio; Roberto A Bogomolni; Kevin H Gardner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  An analysis of the solution structure and signaling mechanism of LovK, a sensor histidine kinase integrating light and redox signals.

Authors:  Erin B Purcell; Claudia A McDonald; Bruce A Palfey; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Photoactivation Reduces Side-Chain Dynamics of a LOV Photoreceptor.

Authors:  Andreas M Stadler; Esther Knieps-Grünhagen; Marco Bocola; Wiebke Lohstroh; Michaela Zamponi; Ulrich Krauss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Variations in protein-flavin hydrogen bonding in a light, oxygen, voltage domain produce non-Arrhenius kinetics of adduct decay.

Authors:  Brian D Zoltowski; Abigail I Nash; Kevin H Gardner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Light-induced subunit dissociation by a light-oxygen-voltage domain photoreceptor from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  Karen S Conrad; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Optogenetic control of cell function using engineered photoreceptors.

Authors:  Gopal P Pathak; Justin D Vrana; Chandra L Tucker
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.