Literature DB >> 19771460

Gender-specific differences in stroke knowledge, stroke risk perception and the effects of an educational multimedia campaign.

Juergen J Marx1, Bianca Klawitter, Andreas Faldum, Bernhard M Eicke, Birgit Haertle, Marianne Dieterich, Max Nedelmann.   

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying gender-specific differences in stroke knowledge, stroke risk perception and the educational effects of a multimodal educational intervention. We performed computer-assisted telephone surveys among an average sample of 500 members of the general public (44.0% male, 56.0% female), before and immediately after an intense 3-month educational stroke campaign in a western German area of 400,000 inhabitants. The intervention was comprised of poster advertisements and various print media. Slogans and stroke interest stories appeared regularly in local newspapers, on television and radio and public events focussed on the subject. Even before the intervention, more women than men were able to name at least one stroke warning sign (71.3 vs. 57.8%, p < 0.01), to name the correct emergency call number (33.3 vs. 24.3%, p < 0.05) or to cite the correct action in acute stroke ("call emergency care", 87.2 vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001). In some aspects women showed a generally better improvement of knowledge after the campaign (e.g. correct emergency call number: +5.7 vs. +1.2%, p < 0.05). Fewer women than men considered themselves as being at risk of stroke (30.9 vs. 36.9%. p < 0.01) with a significant increase following the intervention in both sexes (38.9/46.0%, p < 0.01). The perception of different educational media varied between the sexes. For example, female sex was independently associated with a better recall of poster advertisements and flyers in pharmacies and at the doctor's office (OR 1.44). Our data indicate that educational programs do have gender-specific effects. Women show a better stroke knowledge and in some aspects a better chance to gain information from classical broad educational interventions. Future campaigns should be tailored economically, and should focus different media and educational messages on the two sexes accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19771460     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5326-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  42 in total

1.  Perceived risk for developing stroke among older adults.

Authors:  Todd S Harwell; Lynda L Blades; Carrie S Oser; Dennis W Dietrich; Nicholas J Okon; Daniel V Rodriguez; Anne M Burnett; Joseph A Russell; Martha J Allen; Crystelle C Fogle; Steven D Helgerson; Dorothy Gohdes
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Knowledge about risk factors for stroke: a population-based survey with 28,090 participants.

Authors:  Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christian H Nolte; Karin Rossnagel; Gerhard J Jungehülsing; Andreas Reich; Stephanie Roll; Arno Villringer; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

4.  Trends in incidence, lifetime risk, severity, and 30-day mortality of stroke over the past 50 years.

Authors:  Raphael Carandang; Sudha Seshadri; Alexa Beiser; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Carlos S Kase; William B Kannel; Philip A Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Factors influencing treatment compliance among Turkish people at risk for stroke.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Koçer; Nurhan Ince; Emel Koçer; Atilla Taşçi
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2006-01-19

6.  Sex differences and similarities in the management and outcome of stroke patients.

Authors:  J M Holroyd-Leduc; M K Kapral; P C Austin; J V Tu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Factors delaying hospital admission in acute stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; J Reith; H O Raaschou; T S Olsen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  An evaluation of the results of media and educational campaigns designed to shorten the time taken by patients with acute myocardial infarction to decide to go to hospital.

Authors:  M B Blohm; M Hartford; B W Karlson; R V Luepker; J Herlitz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Critical factors determining access to acute stroke care.

Authors:  S C Menon; D K Pandey; L B Morgenstern
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Women's experiences of cardiac pain: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy
Journal:  Can J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2008
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Measurement and Outcomes of the Perceived Risk of Stroke: A Review.

Authors:  Dawn M Aycock; Patricia C Clark; Semere Araya
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Results of an educational campaign on stroke awareness in the 2032 Rotary District in Northern-Western Italy.

Authors:  C Gandolfo; F Alberti; M Del Sette; A Gagliano; N Reale
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Translation and validation of the Malay version of the Stroke Knowledge Test.

Authors:  Siti Noorkhairina Sowtali; Dariah Mohd Yusoff; Sakinah Harith; Monniaty Mohamed
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Knowledge, attitude, and practice of stroke among high school students in Nepal.

Authors:  Lekhjung Thapa; Nooma Sharma; Ramesh Sharma Poudel; Tirtha Raj Bhandari; Riwaz Bhagat; Ashis Shrestha; Shakti Shrestha; Dipendra Khatiwada; Louis R Caplan
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.