| Literature DB >> 19771306 |
Santosh Loganathan1, Srinivasa R Murthy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is important to understand stigma in India, given its varied culture and mixture of rural and urban populations. Information from western literature cannot be applied without considering the sociocultural differences. AIMS: The research aimed to study the subjective experiences of stigma and discrimination undergone by people suffering from schizophrenia in rural and urban environments in India. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Experiences; schizophrenia; stigma and discrimination
Year: 2008 PMID: 19771306 PMCID: PMC2745872 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.39758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Psychiatry ISSN: 0019-5545 Impact factor: 1.759
Selected international research findings
| Thematic content | Author, year | Findings | Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public services | Watson | Police view mentally ill as less responsible,more deserving of pity, more worthy of help, Increased perception of violence[ | Though study did not replicate real life situation, hostile approach can aggravate circumstances |
| Educational institutes | Corrigan | In contrast to adults, adolescents reported that contact led to more discrimination[ | Possibly of adolescents having less pre existing information, teenagers experience with stereotype |
| Family | Phillips | Close association between high expressed emotion and perceived effect of stigma[ | Intervention aimed at either problem may relieve both |
| Media | |||
| a) Movies | Schneider, 1987 | Serious films outnumbered by exploitation/horror films[ | False picture of psychiatrists' work has been presented to the public |
| b) Newspaper | Day | Newspaper portray mentally ill in a negative fashion[ | Portrayal as a group devoid of positive social identity |
| Work setting | Manning and White, 1995 | Most employers cautious in employing currently ill, More likely to believe a sick-note declaring a physical than a mental illness, Many employers were ‘unsure ‘in their replies[ | Reflects ignorance about mental illness and its effect on work ability Being on a medically approved treatment program may enhance employment chances |
| Interventions | Corrigan | Education yields some positive benefits, Contact with patients yields the greatest results Protest yielded no improvement[ | Apart from imparting knowledge, promoting contact with mentally ill more effective |
| Trying to suppress negative attitude actually maintains that knowledge | |||
| Coping strategy | Katsching, 2000 | Both, stigma acceptance and stigma avoidance are irritating and energy-consuming processes[ | Both these forms of coping are associated with distress |
| Health services | Hotopf, 2000 | Nature of psychiatrists' job itself can be stigmatizing, So can the side effects of medications prescribed[ | Psychiatrists must challenge their own prejudices, Can play a role in maintaining and reducing stigma |
Summary of Indian studies
| Author, year | Result Summary | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Neki, 1966 | Public fears and rejects mentally ill; Rural population more tolerant[ | Absolute need to educate public about mental illness. Empower rural population with adequate knowledge. |
| Dube, 1970 | Misconception, superstition and ignorance; Viewing mental illness as visitation of the evil spirits [ | Dispelling myths and providing the right information to people |
| Verghese and Baig, 1974 | Majority had positive attitudes; Two-thirds against marital alliance to a family, with a history of mental illness. (Bias in sample: predominantly urban)[ | Though results were biased due to the sampling, still the need to provide information about marriage and mental illness |
| Wig | Pessimistic community attitudes; Preferred modern health services and later returning to traditional healers[ | Awareness and education of the public alone can improve negativistic attitudes. |
| Traditional healers too need to be aware of facts about mental illness | ||
| Thara and Srinivasan, 2000 | Marriage, dread of rejection from neighbors, concealing the illness, being a female and younger age of caregiver and patient were most stigmatizing;[ | Need to dispel myths about marriage and its relation to illness |
| Hiding illness from others can have positive and negative implications | ||
| Srinivasan and Thara, 2001 | Families believing in the supernatural causation of illness less likely[ | Changing views about causation of mental illness with time, when compared to Dube's study (1970) |
| Thara | Women separated from husbands- but not legally, concerned about their future, being a burden to ageing parents[ | Stigma attached to separation was as distressing as that of being mentally ill |
| Murthy | Awareness more among literates and urban; Females felt sexual harassment as a consequence of stigma; In general, stigma was due to emphasis on heredity as a cause, fear of violence and need for lifelong care[ | Need to enhance awareness among rural and illiterate; consolidate gains among the urban. |
| Highlights the particular needs of women with mental illness |
Summary of results
| Vaiables | Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural (n) | Urban (n) | |||
| Impact of illness on general life | ||||
| Hide your illness | ||||
| Yes | 40 | 60 | 100 (50) | 0.007 |
| No | 60 | 40 | 100 (50) | |
| Relationship of stigma experience and phase of illness | ||||
| Acute Phase | 92 | 94 | 186 (93) | 0.6 |
| Common stigma and discrimination experiences | ||||
| Ridiculing by others | ||||
| Yes | 29 | 16 | 45 (22.5) | 0.041 |
| No | 71 | 84 | 155 (77.5) | |
| Sources of stigma | ||||
| Unacceptable behavior | 53 | 48 | 101 (50.5) | 0.766 |
| Lack of correct knowledge | 19 | 26 | 45 (22.5) | |
| Not being able to work | 15 | 14 | 29 (14.5) | |
| Supernatural causation | 3 | 1 | 4 (2) | |
| Consequences of stigma | ||||
| Conceal illness in job applications | ||||
| Yes | 16 | 34 | 50 (25) | 0.003 |
| No | 84 | 66 | 150 (75) | |
| Attitude of friends and relatives | ||||
| Hide from relatives | ||||
| Yes | 38 | 51 | 89 (44.5) | 0.087 |
| No | 62 | 49 | 111 (55.5) | |
Results of socio-demographic characteristics
| Socio-demographic data | Rural (%) | Urban (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 15-29 | 28 | 26 |
| 30-45 | 43 | 40 |
| 46-60 | 29 | 34 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 60 | 58 |
| Female | 40 | 42 |
| Income (Rs.) | ||
| Nil | 45 | 49 |
| <1,000 | 33 | 18 |
| >1,000 | 22 | 33 |
| Family type | ||
| Single | - | 3 |
| Joint | 40 | 23 |
| Nuclear | 60 | 74 |
| Education | ||
| Illiterate | 30 | 9 |
| Schooling | 50 | 45 |
| Higher | 20 | 46 |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 64 | 51 |
| Single | 28 | 33 |
| Others | 8 | 16 |
| Employment | ||
| Employed | 49 | 51 |
| Unemployed | 21 | 22 |
| Homemaker | 30 | 37 |
| Illness type | ||
| Paranoid | 74 | 82 |
| Hebephrenic | 1 | - |
| Catatonic | 2 | - |
| Undifferentiated | 8 | 11 |
| Residual | 4 | 2 |
| Simple | 1 | - |
| Schizophrenia NOS | 10 | 5 |
| Illness duration | ||
| 6months-2 year | 3 | 7 |
| 2-4 years | 57 | 60 |
| 4-6 years | 40 | 33 |