PURPOSE: We wanted to determine and report on the outcome of combined gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy for patients suffering with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1999 and December 2004, 43 selected patients were enrolled in this study. Group 1 (the adjuvant chemotherapy group) had undergone radical surgery with removal of evident tumor from the following primary sites: bladder (n=8), renal pelvis (n=7) and ureter (n=3). Group 2 (the salvage chemotherapy group) had undergone palliative surgery with a remnant tumor at the following primary sites; bladder (n=23) and renal pelvis (n=2). All the patients were given gemcitabine/ciplatin and they evaluated for the therapeutic effect and toxicity. The patients were initially treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously for 30 minutes on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on day 1 using prehydration measures. RESULTS: Group 1: The median follow-up period was 16.5 months. The mean age was 63 years (males: 15 cases, females: 3 cases), and eleven patients (61%) remained alive. The estimated median relapse-free survival period and 2-year survival rate were 24 months and 63%, respectively. Group 2: the median follow-up period was 20 months, the mean patient age was 63.8 years (males: 22 cases, females: 3 cases), and nine patients (36%) remained alive. The overall response and 2-year survival rates were 36% and 43%, respectively. Toxicities: Grade 3 toxicities developed in 14 cycles during the total 232 cycles. Grade 4 toxicity did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that adjuvant and salvage chemotherapy with using gemcitabine and cisplatin is tolerable and safe.
PURPOSE: We wanted to determine and report on the outcome of combined gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy for patients suffering with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1999 and December 2004, 43 selected patients were enrolled in this study. Group 1 (the adjuvant chemotherapy group) had undergone radical surgery with removal of evident tumor from the following primary sites: bladder (n=8), renal pelvis (n=7) and ureter (n=3). Group 2 (the salvage chemotherapy group) had undergone palliative surgery with a remnant tumor at the following primary sites; bladder (n=23) and renal pelvis (n=2). All the patients were given gemcitabine/ciplatin and they evaluated for the therapeutic effect and toxicity. The patients were initially treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) intravenously for 30 minutes on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on day 1 using prehydration measures. RESULTS: Group 1: The median follow-up period was 16.5 months. The mean age was 63 years (males: 15 cases, females: 3 cases), and eleven patients (61%) remained alive. The estimated median relapse-free survival period and 2-year survival rate were 24 months and 63%, respectively. Group 2: the median follow-up period was 20 months, the mean patient age was 63.8 years (males: 22 cases, females: 3 cases), and nine patients (36%) remained alive. The overall response and 2-year survival rates were 36% and 43%, respectively. Toxicities: Grade 3 toxicities developed in 14 cycles during the total 232 cycles. Grade 4 toxicity did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that adjuvant and salvage chemotherapy with using gemcitabine and cisplatin is tolerable and safe.
Authors: S B Saxman; K J Propert; L H Einhorn; E D Crawford; I Tannock; D Raghavan; P J Loehrer; D Trump Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Patrick A Burch; James A Mailliard; David W Hillman; Edith A Perez; James E Krook; Kendrith M Rowland; Michael H Veeder; Michael W Cannon; James N Ingle Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: M J Byrne; M Phillips; A Powell; F Cameron; D Joseph; N Spry; J Dewar; G Van Hazel; M Buck; H Lund; Y De Melker; M Newman Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: J Lehmann; M Retz; G Steiner; P Albers; E Jaeger; A Knuth; C Lippert; M Koser; K Stockamp; C Otto; H Melchior; C Fassmann; C Potratz; T Loch; H G Derigs; T Becker; T Kälble; H-J Piechota; L Hertle; S Weinknecht; L Weissbach; M Al-Mwalad; A Hamza; H Henss; D Brkovic; S Pomer; J Roloff; P Walz; R Muschter; U Tunn; E Winter; P Bub; U Kaldenbach; S Roth; A Brauers; G Jakse; A E Richter; M Wirth; J Hartlapp; H Van Ahlen; M Stöckle Journal: Urologe A Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Barbara J Gitlitz; Carole Baker; Yvonne Chapman; Heather J Allen; Linda D Bosserman; Ravi Patel; James D Sanchez; Richard M Shapiro; Robert A Figlin Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860