PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the efficacy of topical cyclosporine 0.05% at a frequency of 3 to 4 times daily in severe dry eye disease. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients with severe dry eye disease who had shown inadequate response to at least a 4-month course of treatment with twice-daily use of topical cyclosporine 0.05% but who showed significant improvement to more frequent dosing. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients, including 13 patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease and 9 patients with primary or secondary Sjögren's syndrome, were included. After a minimum of a 2-month course of treatment with more frequent dosing of cyclosporine 0.05% (3 times a day in 7 patients and 4 times a day in 15 patients), overall dry eye symptoms were improved in 15 (68.2%) patients (9 patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease and 6 patients with Sjögren's syndrome). Mean corneal fluorescein staining scores (National Eye Institute scale of 0-15) improved (decreased) from the baseline (precyclosporine use) by -3.5 (range, 0 to -7) in patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease (P < or = 0.0008) and -2.8 (range, 0 to -5) in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (P < or = 0.001). After treatment with high-frequency use of cyclosporine 0.05%, the global physician assessment of dry eye status was favorable (improved) in 16 (72.7%) patients. Three (13.6%) patients reported new-onset symptoms of burning or irritation with the use of high-frequency dosing of topical cyclosporine. No other associated adverse effect was reported. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients with severe dry eye may require more frequent dosing of topical cyclosporine 0.05% than twice daily.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the efficacy of topical cyclosporine 0.05% at a frequency of 3 to 4 times daily in severe dry eye disease. METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients with severe dry eye disease who had shown inadequate response to at least a 4-month course of treatment with twice-daily use of topical cyclosporine 0.05% but who showed significant improvement to more frequent dosing. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients, including 13 patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease and 9 patients with primary or secondary Sjögren's syndrome, were included. After a minimum of a 2-month course of treatment with more frequent dosing of cyclosporine 0.05% (3 times a day in 7 patients and 4 times a day in 15 patients), overall dry eye symptoms were improved in 15 (68.2%) patients (9 patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease and 6 patients with Sjögren's syndrome). Mean corneal fluorescein staining scores (National Eye Institute scale of 0-15) improved (decreased) from the baseline (precyclosporine use) by -3.5 (range, 0 to -7) in patients with ocular graft-versus-host disease (P < or = 0.0008) and -2.8 (range, 0 to -5) in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (P < or = 0.001). After treatment with high-frequency use of cyclosporine 0.05%, the global physician assessment of dry eye status was favorable (improved) in 16 (72.7%) patients. Three (13.6%) patients reported new-onset symptoms of burning or irritation with the use of high-frequency dosing of topical cyclosporine. No other associated adverse effect was reported. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that patients with severe dry eye may require more frequent dosing of topical cyclosporine 0.05% than twice daily.
Authors: F Brignole; P J Pisella; M Goldschild; M De Saint Jean; A Goguel; C Baudouin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: David S Small; Andrew Acheampong; Brenda Reis; Katherine Stern; William Stewart; Gregg Berdy; Randy Epstein; Robert Foerster; Lance Forstot; Diane D-S Tang-Liu Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: Mark S Milner; Kenneth A Beckman; Jodi I Luchs; Quentin B Allen; Richard M Awdeh; John Berdahl; Thomas S Boland; Carlos Buznego; Joseph P Gira; Damien F Goldberg; David Goldman; Raj K Goyal; Mitchell A Jackson; James Katz; Terry Kim; Parag A Majmudar; Ranjan P Malhotra; Marguerite B McDonald; Rajesh K Rajpal; Tal Raviv; Sheri Rowen; Neda Shamie; Jonathan D Solomon; Karl Stonecipher; Shachar Tauber; William Trattler; Keith A Walter; George O Waring; Robert J Weinstock; William F Wiley; Elizabeth Yeu Journal: Curr Opin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Tulio B Abud; Francisco Amparo; Ujwala S Saboo; Antonio Di Zazzo; Thomas H Dohlman; Joseph B Ciolino; Pedram Hamrah; Reza Dana Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: S Pezzotta; C Del Fante; L Scudeller; G C Rossi; C Perotti; P E Bianchi; E Antoniazzi Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Yoshihiro Inamoto; Igor Petriček; Linda Burns; Saurabh Chhabra; Zachariah DeFilipp; Peiman Hematti; Alicia Rovó; Raquel Schears; Ami Shah; Vaibhav Agrawal; Aisha Ahmed; Ibrahim Ahmed; Asim Ali; Mahmoud Aljurf; Hassan Alkhateeb; Amer Beitinjaneh; Neel Bhatt; Dave Buchbinder; Michael Byrne; Natalie Callander; Kristina Fahnehjelm; Nosha Farhadfar; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Shahrukh Hashmi; Gerhard C Hildebrandt; Erich Horn; Ann Jakubowski; Rammurti T Kamble; Jason Law; Catherine Lee; Sunita Nathan; Olaf Penack; Ravi Pingali; Pinki Prasad; Drazen Pulanic; Seth Rotz; Aditya Shreenivas; Amir Steinberg; Khalid Tabbara; André Tichelli; Baldeep Wirk; Jean Yared; Grzegorz W Basak; Minoo Battiwalla; Rafael Duarte; Bipin N Savani; Mary E D Flowers; Bronwen E Shaw; Nuria Valdés-Sanz Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Hao Guo; Changrim Lee; Mihir Shah; Srikanth R Janga; Maria C Edman; Wannita Klinngam; Sarah F Hamm-Alvarez; J Andrew MacKay Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 9.776