Literature DB >> 19770703

The efficacy of the surgical delay procedure in pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction.

Dunya Atisha1, Amy K Alderman, Tim Janiga, Bonita Singal, Edwin G Wilkins.   

Abstract

Although experimental evidence suggests that the preliminary surgical delay procedure physiologically improves the circulation of the TRAM flap, there are no published controlled studies evaluating the clinical outcomes associated with this procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the surgical flap delay versus no delay in consecutive patients having pedicle TRAM breast reconstruction. This was a retrospective cohort study of breast cancer patients at the University of Michigan who had pedicle TRAM reconstruction between January 2004 and March 2008. Prior to September 2005, all patients had pedicle TRAM reconstruction without the delay procedure. Starting in September 2005, all patients had the delay procedure prior to TRAM flap reconstruction. Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic data, comorbidities, and complication rates between the 2 cohorts. Regression analysis was used to determine the effects of the surgical delay procedure on the incidence of flap ischemia and major and minor complications while controlling for patient and treatment level factors. Eighty-seven postmastectomy breast cancer patients had unipedicle TRAM flap reconstruction, in which 112 flaps were used to reconstruct breasts. The nondelay cohort consisted of 42 consecutive patients (51 flaps) and the delay cohort consisted of 45 consecutive patients (61 flaps). Of the patients without the surgical delay procedure 17.6% experienced at least one ischemic complication of the flap compared with 6.6% of those who were surgically delayed (P = 0.082). When controlling for patient and treatment level factors, the delay procedure was found to significantly decrease the incidence of flap ischemia (OR = 0.21, P = 0.018). In addition, there were no significant differences in the incidence of major or minor complication rates in the surgically delayed versus nondelayed groups (P = 0.247, P = 0.486, respectively). When patient and treatment level factors were taken into consideration, undergoing the delay procedure also did not increase the incidence of having a major or minor complication. These data support the use of the preliminary surgical delay procedure to decrease ischemic complications of the flap in pedicle TRAM postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770703     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819516ba

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  5 in total

1.  Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter A: Surgery, Pathology and Prognostic Factors, Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssena; Nadia Harbeckb
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Clinical application of adipose stem cells in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Yong-Jin Kim; Jae-Ho Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  A New Concept of Interval TRAM for Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Obese Women.

Authors:  Ashraf Khater; EmadEldeen Hamed; Sameh Roshdy; Waleed Elnahas; Omar Farouk; Ahmed Senbel; Adel Fathi; Osama Eldamshety; Ahmed Abdallah
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-01-03

Review 4.  Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Geraldine Darmanin; Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

5.  The Language of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Shamit S Prabhu; Ramon Llull; Adam J Katz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.