STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age and sex on the three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine kinematics information has important implications for biomechanical model development, anthropomorphic test device development, injury prevention, surgical treatment, and safety equipment design. There is a paucity of data of this type available for children, and it is unknown whether cervical spine kinematics of the pediatric population is different than that of adults. The helical axis of motion (HAM) of the spine provides unique information about the quantity and quality (coupling etc.) of the measured motion. METHODS: Ninety subjects were recruited and divided into 6 groups based on sex and age (young children aged 4-10 years, older children aged 11-17 years, adults aged 25+ years). Subjects actively moved their head in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion/extension. An optoelectronic motion analysis system recorded the position of infrared markers placed on the first thoracic vertebrae (T1) and on tight-fitting headgear worn by the subjects. HAM parameters were calculated for the head motion with respect to T1. RESULTS: HAM location in axial rotation and flexion/extension was more anterior in young females compared to adult females. Young females had a more anterior HAM location in flexion/extension compared to young males, indicating an effect of sex. For females, the HAM locations of adults were superior to those of children in flexion/extension and lateral bending whereas in males the HAM locations of adults were inferior to those of children. Age-related differences in HAM orientation were also observed in axial rotation and lateral bending. CONCLUSION.: Cervical spine kinematics vary with age and sex. The variation in spine mechanics based on age and sex found in the present study may indicate general trends that would grow stronger in even younger children (age <4 years).
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of age and sex on the three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine kinematics information has important implications for biomechanical model development, anthropomorphic test device development, injury prevention, surgical treatment, and safety equipment design. There is a paucity of data of this type available for children, and it is unknown whether cervical spine kinematics of the pediatric population is different than that of adults. The helical axis of motion (HAM) of the spine provides unique information about the quantity and quality (coupling etc.) of the measured motion. METHODS: Ninety subjects were recruited and divided into 6 groups based on sex and age (young children aged 4-10 years, older children aged 11-17 years, adults aged 25+ years). Subjects actively moved their head in axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion/extension. An optoelectronic motion analysis system recorded the position of infrared markers placed on the first thoracic vertebrae (T1) and on tight-fitting headgear worn by the subjects. HAM parameters were calculated for the head motion with respect to T1. RESULTS: HAM location in axial rotation and flexion/extension was more anterior in young females compared to adult females. Young females had a more anterior HAM location in flexion/extension compared to young males, indicating an effect of sex. For females, the HAM locations of adults were superior to those of children in flexion/extension and lateral bending whereas in males the HAM locations of adults were inferior to those of children. Age-related differences in HAM orientation were also observed in axial rotation and lateral bending. CONCLUSION.: Cervical spine kinematics vary with age and sex. The variation in spine mechanics based on age and sex found in the present study may indicate general trends that would grow stronger in even younger children (age <4 years).
Authors: Arin M Ellingson; Vishal Yelisetti; Craig A Schulz; Gert Bronfort; Joseph Downing; Daniel F Keefe; David J Nuckley Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: Dhananjay R Namjoshi; Craig Good; Wai Hang Cheng; William Panenka; Darrin Richards; Peter A Cripton; Cheryl L Wellington Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 5.758