Literature DB >> 19770486

Discrimination for genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes improves with exposure time.

Karen Mathijs1, Karen J J Brauers, Danyel G J Jennen, Andre Boorsma, Marcel H M van Herwijnen, Ralph W H Gottschalk, Jos C S Kleinjans, Joost H M van Delft.   

Abstract

Assessing the potential carcinogenicity of chemicals for humans represents an ongoing challenge. Chronic rodent bioassays predict human cancer risk at only limited reliability and are simultaneously expensive and long lasting. In order to seek for alternatives, the ability of a transcriptomics-based primary mouse hepatocyte model to classify carcinogens by their modes of action was evaluated. As it is obvious that exposure will induce a cascade of gene expression modifications, in particular, the influence of exposure time in vitro on discriminating genotoxic (GTX) carcinogens from nongenotoxic (NGTX) carcinogens class discrimination was investigated. Primary mouse hepatocytes from male C57Bl6 mice were treated for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h with two GTX and two NGTX carcinogens. For validation, two additional GTX compounds were studied at 24 and 48 h. Immunostaining of gammaH2AX foci was applied in order to phenotypically verify DNA damage. It confirmed significant induction of DNA damage after treatment with GTX compounds but not with NGTX compounds. Whole-genome gene expression modifications were analyzed by means of Affymetrix microarrays. When using differentially expressed genes from data sets normalized by Robust Multi-array Average, the two classes and various compounds were better separated from each other by hierarchical clustering when increasing the treatment period. Discrimination of GTX and NGTX carcinogens by Prediction Analysis of Microarray improved with time and resulted in correct classification of the validation compounds. The present study shows that gene expression profiling in primary mouse hepatocytes is promising for discriminating GTX from NGTX compounds and that this discrimination improves with increasing treatment period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770486     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  13 in total

1.  In vivo assessment of respiratory burst inhibition by xenobiotic exposure using larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Drake W Phelps; Ashley A Fletcher; Ivan Rodriguez-Nunez; Michele R Balik-Meisner; Debra A Tokarz; David M Reif; Dori R Germolec; Jeffrey A Yoder
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  A niche for infectious disease in environmental health: rethinking the toxicological paradigm.

Authors:  Beth J Feingold; Leora Vegosen; Meghan Davis; Jessica Leibler; Amy Peterson; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Discovery of characteristic molecular signatures for the simultaneous prediction and detection of environmental pollutants.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Han-Seam Choi; Yong-Keun Park; Jae-Chun Ryu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Screening for drug-induced hepatotoxicity in primary mouse hepatocytes using acetaminophen, amiodarone, and cyclosporin a as model compounds: an omics-guided approach.

Authors:  Anke Van Summeren; Johan Renes; Daneida Lizarraga; Freek G Bouwman; Jean-Paul Noben; Joost H M van Delft; Jos C S Kleinjans; Edwin C M Mariman
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2013-01-11

5.  Human embryonic stem cell derived hepatocyte-like cells as a tool for in vitro hazard assessment of chemical carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Reha Yildirimman; Gabriella Brolén; Mireia Vilardell; Gustav Eriksson; Jane Synnergren; Hans Gmuender; Atanas Kamburov; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; José Castell; Agustin Lahoz; Jos Kleinjans; Joost van Delft; Petter Björquist; Ralf Herwig
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  New short term prediction method for chemical carcinogenicity by hepatic transcript profiling following 28-day toxicity tests in rats.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsumoto; Yoshikuni Yakabe; Fumiyo Saito; Koichi Saito; Kayo Sumida; Masaru Sekijima; Koji Nakayama; Hideki Miyaura; Masanori Otsuka; Tomoyuki Shirai
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2011-10-27

7.  Effect of chemical mutagens and carcinogens on gene expression profiles in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Lode Godderis; Reuben Thomas; Alan E Hubbard; Ali M Tabish; Peter Hoet; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Hendrik Veulemans; Cliona M McHale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Synergistic Gene Expression Signature Observed in TK6 Cells upon Co-Exposure to UVC-Irradiation and Protein Kinase C-Activating Tumor Promoters.

Authors:  Kyle P Glover; Zhongqiang Chen; Lauren K Markell; Xing Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Nuclear Receptor Signaling Atlas: Opening Access to the Biology of Nuclear Receptor Signaling Pathways.

Authors:  Lauren B Becnel; Yolanda F Darlington; Scott A Ochsner; Jeremy R Easton-Marks; Christopher M Watkins; Apollo McOwiti; Wasula H Kankanamge; Michael W Wise; Michael DeHart; Ronald N Margolis; Neil J McKenna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Investigating the different mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens by a gene set analysis.

Authors:  Won Jun Lee; Sang Cheol Kim; Seul Ji Lee; Jeongmi Lee; Jeong Hill Park; Kyung-Sang Yu; Johan Lim; Sung Won Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.