Literature DB >> 19770405

Regression of left ventricular mass by antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized comparative studies.

Robert H Fagard1, Hilde Celis, Lutgarde Thijs, Stijn Wouters.   

Abstract

Blood pressure-lowering therapy reduces left ventricular mass, but the question of whether differences exist among drug classes has not been fully resolved. Our aim was to compare the effects of diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers on left ventricular mass regression in patients with hypertension on the basis of prospective, randomized comparative studies. We performed meta-analyses, involving pooled pairwise comparisons of the drug classes and of each class versus other classes statistically combined, and meta-regression analyses to identify the determinants of the regression. The 75 relevant publications involved 84 pairwise comparisons and 6001 patients. Regression of left ventricular mass was significantly less (P=0.01) with beta-blockers (9.8%) than with angiotensin receptor blockers (12.5%), but none of the other analyzable pairwise comparisons between drug classes revealed significant differences (P>0.10). In addition, beta-blockers showed less regression than the other 4 classes statistically combined (P<0.01), and regression was more pronounced with angiotensin receptor blockers versus the others (P<0.01). In multivariable meta-regression analysis on all of the treatment arms, beta-blocker treatment was a significant and negative predictor of the regression (-3.6%; P<0.01), but this was not the case for the other drug classes, including angiotensin receptor blockers. In conclusion, beta-blockers show less regression of left ventricular mass, whereas angiotensin receptor blockers may induce larger regression. The inferiority of beta-blockers appears to be more convincing than the superiority of angiotensin receptor blockers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770405     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.136655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  72 in total

Review 1.  Carotid baroreceptor activation for the treatment of resistant hypertension and heart failure.

Authors:  Michael Doumas; Charles Faselis; Costas Tsioufis; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular mass: prognostic implications.

Authors:  Rajiv S Swamy; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Cardiac Abnormalities in Youth with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Fida Bacha; Samuel S Gidding
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kim; Ju-Hee Lee; Eung Ju Kim; Dae-Gyun Park; Sung-Ji Park; Jin Joo Park; Mi-Seung Shin; Byung Su Yoo; Jong-Chan Youn; Sang Eun Lee; Sang Hyun Ihm; Se Yong Jang; Sang-Ho Jo; Jae Yeong Cho; Hyun-Jai Cho; Seonghoon Choi; Jin-Oh Choi; Seong Woo Han; Kyung Kuk Hwang; Eun Seok Jeon; Myeong-Chan Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 5.  Cardiac adaptation to exercise training in health and disease.

Authors:  Dae Yun Seo; Hyo-Bum Kwak; Amy Hyein Kim; Se Hwan Park; Jun Won Heo; Hyoung Kyu Kim; Jeong Rim Ko; Sam Jun Lee; Hyun Seok Bang; Jun Woo Sim; Min Kim; Jin Han
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Determinants of left ventricular mass in patients on hemodialysis: Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Trials.

Authors:  Christopher T Chan; Tom Greene; Glenn M Chertow; Alan S Kliger; John B Stokes; Gerald J Beck; John T Daugirdas; Peter Kotanko; Brett Larive; Nathan W Levin; Ravindra L Mehta; Michael Rocco; Javier Sanz; Brigitte M Schiller; Phillip C Yang; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 7.  Alterations in cardiac structure and function in hypertension.

Authors:  Mário Santos; Amil M Shah
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Anti-hypertensive drugs and left ventricular hypertrophy: a clinical update.

Authors:  Alberto Milan; Mimma A Caserta; Eleonora Avenatti; Sara Abram; Franco Veglio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 9.  Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure.

Authors:  Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Left ventricular mass assessment by CMR; how to define the optimal index.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.