| Literature DB >> 19770151 |
Alex C Ezeh1, Blessing U Mberu, Jacques O Emina.
Abstract
We use data from the Demographic and Health Surveys to examine the patterns of stall in fertility decline in four Eastern African countries. Contrary to patterns of fertility transition in Africa that cut across various socio-economic and geographical groups within countries, we find strong selectivity of fertility stall across different groups and regions in all four countries. In both Kenya and Tanzania where fertility decline has stalled at the national level, it continued to decline among the most educated women and in some regions. While fertility has remained at pre-transition level in Uganda over the past 20 years, there are signs of decline with specific groups of women (especially the most educated, urban and those in the Eastern region) taking the lead. For Zimbabwe, although fertility has continued to decline at the national level, stall is observed among women with less than secondary education and those in some of the regions. We link these intra-country variations to differential changes in socio-economic variables, family planning programme environment and reproductive behaviour models. The results suggest that declines in contraceptive use, increases in unmet need for family planning, increasing preferences for larger families, and increases in adolescent fertility were consistently associated with stalls in subgroup fertility across all four countries. These results are consistent with models that emphasize the role of declines in national and international commitments to family planning programmes in the premature stall in sub-Saharan fertility transition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19770151 PMCID: PMC2781835 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8436 Impact factor: 6.237
Figure 1.Analytical framework for the determinants of stalled fertility decline.
Countries included in the study and years of respective surveys.
| country | year of survey (DHS) | years covered by all surveys | no. of regions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1989, 1993, 1998, 2003 | 14 | 7 |
| Tanzania | 1992, 1996, 1999, 2004 | 12 | 6 |
| Uganda | 1988, 1995, 2000/2001, 2007 | 19 | 4 |
| Zimbabwe | 1988, 1994, 1999, 2005/2006 | 18 | 10 |
TFR trends by countries.
| country | survey | TFR (%) change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DHS1a | DHS2a | DHS3a | DHS4a | annual | third period (5 years) | |
| Kenya | 6.7 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 4.3 (stall) |
| Tanzania | 6.2 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 1.8 (stall) |
| Uganda | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 0.5 | −5.2 (decrease) |
| Zimbabwe | 5.4 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 1.65 | −6.0 (decrease) |
aDates of each survey are reported in table 1.
Trends in total fertility rates at regional level in Eastern Africa, DHS 1988–2007. DHS statcompiler (measuredhs.com).
| region | TFR1 | TFR2 | TFR3 | TFR4 | change (%) | comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1989 | 1993 | 1998 | 2003 | TFR 3 → 4 | |
| Nairobi | 4.20 | 3.40 | 2.60 | 2.70 | 3.85 | stall |
| Central | 6.00 | 3.90 | 3.70 | 3.40 | −8.11 | declining |
| Coastal | 5.40 | 5.30 | 5.00 | 4.90 | −2.00 | declining |
| Eastern | 7.20 | 5.90 | 4.70 | 5.10 | 8.51 | stall |
| Nyanza | 6.90 | 5.80 | 5.00 | 5.60 | 12.00 | stall |
| Rift valley | 7.00 | 5.70 | 5.30 | 5.80 | 9.43 | stall |
| Western | 8.10 | 6.40 | 5.60 | 5.80 | 3.57 | stall |
| total | 6.70 | 5.40 | 4.70 | 4.90 | 4.26 | stall |
| Tanzania | 1992 | 1996 | 1999 | 2004 | TFR 3 → 4 | |
| Coastal | 5.70 | 4.90 | 4.30 | 4.00 | −6.98 | declining |
| Northern Highlands | 6.00 | 5.70 | 5.10 | 4.90 | −3.92 | declining |
| Lake | 6.90 | 7.00 | 7.10 | 7.00 | −1.41 | declining |
| Central | 7.10 | 6.10 | 5.40 | 6.10 | 12.96 | stall |
| Southern Highlands | 6.30 | 5.40 | 5.20 | 5.90 | 13.46 | stall |
| South | 5.10 | 4.90 | 5.00 | 4.80 | −4.00 | declining |
| total | 6.20 | 5.80 | 5.60 | 5.70 | 1.79 | stall |
| Uganda | 1988 | 1995 | 2000 | 2006/2007 | TFR 3 → 4 | |
| Central | 6.90 | 6.30 | 5.70 | 5.20 | −8.77 | declining |
| Eastern | 7.50 | 7.40 | 7.40 | 7.60 | 2.70 | increasing |
| Northern | 7.40 | 6.80 | 7.90 | 7.40 | −6.33 | declining |
| Western | 7.80 | 7.00 | 6.90 | 6.80 | −1.45 | declining |
| total | 7.40 | 6.90 | 6.90 | 6.70 | −2.90 | declining |
| Zimbabwe | 1988 | 1994 | 1999 | 2006 | TFR 3 → 4 | |
| Manicaland | 5.90 | 4.50 | 4.70 | 4.20 | −10.64 | declining |
| Mashonaland Central | 5.20 | 4.60 | 4.90 | 4.60 | −6.12 | declining |
| Mashonaland East | 5.80 | 4.80 | 4.20 | 3.70 | −11.90 | declining |
| Mashonaland West | 5.70 | 4.80 | 4.10 | 3.70 | −9.76 | declining |
| Matabeleland North | 6.60 | 5.80 | 4.10 | 4.20 | 2.44 | stall |
| Matabeleland South | 5.50 | 5.00 | 4.80 | 4.00 | −16.67 | declining |
| Midlands | 5.80 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.20 | 5.00 | stall |
| Masvingo | 6.40 | 4.60 | 3.90 | 4.90 | 25.64 | stall |
| Harare/Chitungwiza | 3.90 | 2.80 | 3.00 | 2.50 | −16.67 | declining |
| Bulawayo | 3.50 | 3.20 | 3.00 | 2.30 | −23.33 | declining |
| total | 5.40 | 4.30 | 4.00 | 3.80 | −5.00 | declining |
Total fertility rates in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zimbabwe by female education and place of residence. DHS statcompiler (measuredhs.com).
| DHS 1 | DHS 2 | DHS 3 | DHS 4 | per cent change period 3→4 | fertility trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1989 | 1993 | 1998 | 2003 | ||
| no education | 7.5 | 6 | 5.8 | 6.7 | 15.52 | stall |
| primary | 6.9 | 5.7 | 5 | 5.5 | 10 | stall |
| secondary or higher | 4.9 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.2 | −8.57 | declining |
| urban | 4.5 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 6.45 | stall |
| rural | 7.1 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 3.85 | stall |
| total | 6.7 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.26 | stall |
| Tanzania | 1992 | 1996 | 1999 | 2004 | ||
| no education | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.9 | 6.15 | stall |
| primary | 6.3 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 7.69 | stall |
| secondary or higher | 4.2 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.3 | −5.71 | declining |
| urban | 5.1 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 12.50 | stall |
| rural | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 0 | stall |
| total | 6.2 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 1.79 | stall |
| Uganda | 1988 | 1995 | 2000/2001 | 2006/2007 | ||
| no education | 7.9 | 7 | 7.8 | 7.7 | −1.28 | declining |
| primary | 7.2 | 7.1 | 7.3 | 7.2 | −1.37 | declining |
| secondary or higher | 5.6 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 12.82 | stall |
| urban | 5.7 | 5 | 4 | 4.4 | 10 | stall |
| rural | 7.6 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 7.1 | −4.05 | declining |
| total | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 6.7 | −2.90 | declining |
| Zimbabwe | 1988 | 1994 | 1999 | 2005/2006 | ||
| no education | 7.2 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 11.54 | stall |
| primary | 5.7 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 0 | stall |
| secondary or higher | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 | −3.03 | declining |
| urban | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3 | 2.6 | −13.33 | declining |
| rural | 6.2 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 0 | stall |
| total | 5.4 | 4.3 | 4 | 3.8 | −5 | declining |
Change in family planning service environment across regions and fertility trends. n.a., not applicable. **p < 0.05.
| region/country | change in | fertility trends | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unwanted fertility | used public service | family planning approval | unmet needs | heard family planning from radio | ||
| Nairobi | 0.29 | −0.25** | 0 | 0.24 | n.a. | stall |
| Central | −0.61** | −0.13** | −0.03** | 0.03 | n.a. | declining |
| Coastal | 0 | 0.14 | 0.01 | −0.18** | n.a. | declining |
| Eastern | −0.07 | 0.02 | −0.11** | −0.07 | n.a. | stall |
| Nyanza | 0.33 | −0.14** | −0.07** | 0.27 | n.a. | stall |
| Rift Valley | 0.06 | −0.09** | −0.12** | 0.03 | n.a. | stall |
| Western | 0.33 | −0.04 | −0.10** | −0.01 | n.a. | stall |
| total | 0.08** | −0.08** | −0.10** | 0.02 | n.a. | stall |
| Coastal | −0.22** | 0.04 | 0.07** | −0.32** | 0.03** | declining |
| Northern Highlands | 0.41 | 0.01 | 0.16** | −0.30** | 0.04** | declining |
| Lake | −0.44** | 0.04 | 0.21** | 0.19** | 0.10** | declining |
| Central | 0.61 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 0.43** | 0.04** | stall |
| Southern Highlands | 0.59 | 0 | −0.02 | −0.24** | 0.02 | stall |
| South | 0.41 | −0.11** | 0.16** | 0.25 | 0.05** | declining |
| total | 0 | 0.02 | 0.11** | 0 | 0.04 | stall |
| Central | −0.07** | −0.08 | n.a. | 0.06 | −0.02** | declining |
| Eastern | −0.04 | 0.07 | n.a. | −0.01 | −0.04** | increasing |
| Northern | 0.05 | 0.68 | n.a. | 0.40** | 0.02 | declining |
| Western | 0.11 | −0.26 | n.a. | 0.21** | −0.01 | declining |
| total | 0 | 0.06 | n.a. | 0.13** | −0.03** | declining |
| Manicaland | −0.21 | −0.11** | n.a. | 0.09 | −0.05** | declining |
| Mashonaland Central | −0.21 | −0.08** | n.a. | −0.13 | −0.10** | declining |
| Mashonaland East | −0.11 | −0.03** | n.a. | −0.14 | −0.10** | declining |
| Mashonaland West | −0.25 | −0.11** | n.a. | −0.04 | −0.11** | declining |
| Matabeleland North | 0 | 0.06** | n.a. | 0.18** | −0.10** | stall |
| Matabeleland South | 0 | −0.02 | n.a. | −0.03 | −0.11** | declining |
| Midlands | 0 | −0.10** | n.a. | −0.21** | −0.07** | stall |
| Masvingo | 0.11 | 0.02 | n.a. | 0.07 | −0.10** | stall |
| Harare/ Chitungwiza | −0.18** | −0.20** | n.a. | 0.06 | −0.06** | declining |
| Bulawayo | 0.14 | −0.24** | n.a. | 0 | −0.03** | declining |
| total | −0.11** | −0.08** | n.a. | 0 | −0.07** | declining |
Changes in socio-economic factors at the regional level and regional fertility trends. **p < 0.05.
| region/country | change in | fertility trends | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| living in urban area | secondary education | professional work | living in poor households | ||
| Nairobi | 0 | 0.04 | −0.13 | −0.83** | stall |
| Central | 0.37** | 0.20** | 0.06 | −0.68** | declining |
| Coastal | 0.08 | −0.06 | −0.33** | −0.01 | declining |
| Eastern | −0.21** | −0.24** | −0.08 | −0.38** | stall |
| Nyanza | −0.21** | 0.03 | −0.25 | −0.38** | stall |
| Rift Valley | 0.34** | 0.02 | −0.34** | −0.11** | stall |
| Western | −0.05 | −0.23** | −0.51** | −0.27** | stall |
| total | 0.08** | 0 | −0.19** | −0.27** | stall |
| Coastal | 0.17** | 0.40** | 0.25 | 0.12** | declining |
| Northern Highlands | −0.38** | 1.29** | 0.13 | −0.44** | declining |
| Lake | 0.28** | 0.49 | 0.58 | −0.08 | declining |
| Central | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.87 | −0.19** | stall |
| Southern Highlands | −0.15 | −0.06 | −1.07 | −0.18** | stall |
| South | −0.14 | 0.49 | 0.45 | −0.22** | declining |
| total | 0.30** | 0.48** | 0.12 | −0.16** | stall |
| Central | 0.01 | 0.19** | 0.28 | −0.18** | declining |
| Eastern | −0.20** | 0.20** | 0.31 | −0.11** | increasing |
| Northern | 0.45** | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.04 | declining |
| Western | 0.51** | 0.16 | 0.25 | −0.20** | declining |
| total | 0.01 | 0.12** | 0.23 | −0.08** | declining |
| Manicaland | 0.42** | 0.21** | 0.16 | −0.21** | declining |
| Mashonaland Central | −0.47** | 0.15** | 0.31 | 0.15 | declining |
| Mashonaland East | 0.33** | 0.20** | −0.06 | −0.12 | declining |
| Mashonaland West | 0.25** | 0.24** | 0.13 | 0.04 | declining |
| Matabeleland North | −0.37** | 0.05 | −0.33** | 0.23** | stall |
| Matabeleland South | 0.23** | 0.11 | −0.03 | −0.35** | declining |
| Midlands | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.06 | stall |
| Masvingo | −0.26** | 0.01 | −0.66** | 0.04 | stall |
| Harare/Chitungwiza | 0 | 0.07** | −0.09 | 0.13 | declining |
| Bulawayo | 0 | 0.09** | −0.14 | 0 | declining |
| total | 0.01 | 0.11** | −0.07** | 0.03 | declining |
Changes in reproductive behaviour factors at regional level and regional fertility trends. **p < 0.05.
| region/country | change in | fertility trends | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ideal number of children | contraceptive use | adolescent fertility | women in union | ||
| Nairobi | 0.10 | −0.05 | 0.50** | −0.06 | stall |
| Central | 0 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −0.11** | declining |
| Coastal | 0.02 | −0.05 | −0.07 | 0.02 | declining |
| Eastern | 0.21 | −0.08 | −0.02 | −0.01 | stall |
| Nyanza | 0 | −0.17** | 0.10 | 0.02 | stall |
| Rift Valley | −0.02 | −0.07 | 0.10 | −0.01 | stall |
| Western | −0.02 | 0.22** | 0 | −0.06 | stall |
| total | 0.03 | 0 | 0.07 | −0.02** | stall |
| Coastal | −0.08 | 0.23** | −0.56** | 0.01 | declining |
| Northern Highlands | −0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.06 | declining |
| Lake | −0.04 | 0.29** | 0.10 | 0.01 | declining |
| Central | −0.04 | 0.62** | 0.24 | 0.04 | stall |
| Southern Highlands | −0.02 | −0.04 | 0.36** | 0.03 | stall |
| South | −0.08 | 0.52** | −0.14 | −0.09** | declining |
| total | −0.06 | 0.17** | −0.01 | 0.02 | stall |
| Central | 0.02 | −0.03 | −0.33** | −0.08** | declining |
| Eastern | 0.07 | 0.33** | −0.28** | −0.08** | increasing |
| Northern | −0.06 | −0.48** | −0.21** | −0.03** | declining |
| Western | 0 | 0.12 | −0.06 | −0.06** | declining |
| total | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.24** | −0.06** | declining |
| Manicaland | −0.07 | 0.26** | 0.19** | −0.06** | declining |
| Mashonaland Central | −0.06 | 0.11** | −0.17** | 0.01 | declining |
| Mashonaland East | −0.06 | 0.08** | −0.10 | −0.05** | declining |
| Mashonaland West | −0.03 | 0.06 | −0.06 | −0.04 | declining |
| Matabeleland North | 0 | −0.02 | 0.32** | 0 | stall |
| Matabeleland South | −0.02 | 0.10 | −0.44** | −0.07** | declining |
| Midlands | −0.03 | 0.18 | −0.11 | 0.01 | stall |
| Masvingo | 0.03 | −0.02 | 0.29** | 0.03 | stall |
| Harare/Chitungwiza | 0 | 0.07** | −0.05 | −0.12** | declining |
| Bulawayo | −0.02 | 0.06** | −0.59** | −0.23** | declining |
| total | −0.02 | 0.09** | −0.02 | −0.04** | declining |
Bivariate and multivariate probit regression models of change in institutional, socio-economic and reproductive behaviour factors on stalled fertility decline at the regional level in Eastern Africa. *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
| crude effect | family planning service environment | socio-economic | reproductive | overall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change in unwanted fertility | 1.34 | 1.85 | |||
| change in use of public service | −0.07 | 2.47 | |||
| change in proportion approving family planning | −11.35*** | −14.81*** | −12.71*** | ||
| change in unmet need for family planning | 0.86 | 3.50 | |||
| change in proportion of hearing family planning information on radio | 0.25 | ||||
| change in proportion of women living in urban areas | −1.16 | −1.01 | |||
| change in proportion of women with secondary+ education | −3.64 | −1.91 | |||
| change in proportion of women in professional work | −1.70 | −0.95 | |||
| change in proportion of women living in a poor household | −1.04 | −1.48 | |||
| change in ideal number of children | 8.37** | 16.09** | 1.89 | ||
| change in contraceptive use | −0.60 | 0.58 | |||
| change in adolescent fertility | 5.53*** | 5.39*** | 7.64** | ||
| change in proportion of women in union | 14.42*** | 15.12 | 0.18 | ||
| _const | −0.43 | −0.15 | 0.23 | −11.17 | |
| log pseudolikelihood | −4.30 | −15.46 | −9.43 | −4 | |
| Wald chi-square | 9.62** | 9.26* | 17.14*** | 9.97** | |
| 0.57 | 0.25 | 0.54 | 0.60 |
Figure 2.Changes in future population projections before and after the stall in fertility decline (in millions). Red bars, 1998 projections; green bars, 2008 revision).