Literature DB >> 19769504

Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Daniel K Resnick1, Paul A Anderson, Michael G Kaiser, Michael W Groff, Robert F Heary, Langston T Holly, Praveen V Mummaneni, Timothy C Ryken, Tanvir F Choudhri, Edward J Vresilovic, Paul G Matz.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of intraoperative electrophysiological (EP) monitoring in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disease.
METHODS: The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and key words relevant to cervical spine surgery and EP monitoring. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I-III). The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
RESULTS: The reliance on changes in EP monitoring as an indication to alter a surgical plan or administer steroids has not been observed to reduce the incidence of neurological injury during routine surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy or cervical radiculopathy (Class III). However, there is an absence of study data examining the benefit of altering a surgical plan due to EP changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of EP monitoring may serve as a sensitive means to diagnose potential neurological injury during anterior spinal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the practitioner must understand that intraoperative EP worsening is not specific-it may not represent clinical worsening and its recognition does not necessarily prevent neurological injury, nor does it result in improved outcome (Class II). Intraoperative improvement in EP parameters/indices does not appear to forecast outcome with reliability (conflicting Class I data).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19769504     DOI: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  13 in total

1.  Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Anthony Gibson; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; F Brigo; V N Frey; P Lochner; S Leis; S Golaszewski; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: the value of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Ran Harel; David Schleifer; Shmuel Appel; Moshe Attia; Zvi R Cohen; Nachshon Knoller
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Stephen D Zoller; Akshay Sharma; Gina M Mosich; Austin Drysch; Jesse Li; Tara Reza; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  The value of neuromonitoring in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Ran Harel; Nachshon Knoller; Gilad Regev; Yoram Anekstein; Menashe Zaaroor; Joseph Leitner; Eyal Itshayek; Michael P Steinmetz; Thomas E Mroz; Ajit Krishnaney; Richard S Schlenk; Gordon R Bell; Iain H Kalfas; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-08-02

Review 8.  Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Spine: Prevalence, Management, and Prognosis.

Authors:  Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen; Wen-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  The clinical value of three-dimensional measurement in the diagnosis of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Chen Yan; Hao-Yuan Tan; Cheng-Long Ji; Xue-Wei Yu; Huai-Cheng Jia; Fu-Dong Li; Gui-Cheng Jiang; Wei-Shi Li; Fei-Fei Zhou; Zhen Ye; Jing-Chuan Sun; Jian-Gang Shi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

10.  Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Anthony D'Oro; Adedayo O Ashana; Rafael A Buerba; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Sina Pourtaheri
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.