Literature DB >> 19769135

Patch size effects on plant species decline in an experimentally fragmented landscape.

Cathy D Collins1, Robert D Holt, Bryan L Foster.   

Abstract

Understanding local and global extinction is a fundamental objective of both basic and applied ecology. Island biogeography theory (IBT) and succession theory provide frameworks for understanding extinction in changing landscapes. We explore the relative contribution of fragment size vs. succession on species' declines by examining distributions of abundances for 18 plant species declining over time in an experimentally fragmented landscape in northeast Kansas, U.S.A. If patch size effects dominate, early-successional species should persist longer on large patches, but if successional processes dominate, the reverse should hold, because in our system woody plant colonization is accelerated on large patches. To compare the patterns in abundance among patch sizes, we characterize joint shifts in local abundance and occupancy with a new metric: rank occupancy-abundance profiles (ROAPs). As succession progressed, statistically significant patch size effects emerged for 11 of 18 species. More early-successional species persisted longer on large patches, despite the fact that woody encroachment (succession) progressed faster in these patches. Clonal perennial species persisted longer on large patches compared to small patches. All species that persisted longer on small patches were annuals that recruit from the seed bank each year. The degree to which species declined in occupancy vs. abundance varied dramatically among species: some species declined first in occupancy, others remained widespread or even expanded their distribution, even as they declined in local abundance. Consequently, species exhibited various types of rarity as succession progressed. Understanding the effect of fragmentation on extinction trajectories requires a species-by-species approach encompassing both occupancy and local abundance. We propose that ROAPs provide a useful tool for comparing the distribution of local abundances among landscape types, years, and species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19769135     DOI: 10.1890/08-1405.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  6 in total

1.  The effects of landscape variables on the species-area relationship during late-stage habitat fragmentation.

Authors:  Guang Hu; Jianguo Wu; Kenneth J Feeley; Gaofu Xu; Mingjian Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Habitat Fragmentation Intensifies Trade-Offs between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in a Heathland Ecosystem in Southern England.

Authors:  Justine E Cordingley; Adrian C Newton; Robert J Rose; Ralph T Clarke; James M Bullock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Patch size and isolation predict plant species density in a naturally fragmented forest.

Authors:  Miguel A Munguía-Rosas; Salvador Montiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Colonization process determines species diversity via competitive quasi-exclusion.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamauchi; Koichi Ito; Shota Shibasaki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems.

Authors:  Nick M Haddad; Lars A Brudvig; Jean Clobert; Kendi F Davies; Andrew Gonzalez; Robert D Holt; Thomas E Lovejoy; Joseph O Sexton; Mike P Austin; Cathy D Collins; William M Cook; Ellen I Damschen; Robert M Ewers; Bryan L Foster; Clinton N Jenkins; Andrew J King; William F Laurance; Douglas J Levey; Chris R Margules; Brett A Melbourne; A O Nicholls; John L Orrock; Dan-Xia Song; John R Townshend
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Consequences of swamp forest fragmentation on assemblages of vascular epiphytes and climbing plants: Evaluation of the metacommunity structure.

Authors:  Jimmy Pincheira-Ulbrich; Cristián E Hernández; Alfredo Saldaña
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.