Literature DB >> 19769106

Modeling marine protected areas for threatened eiders in a climatically changing Bering Sea.

James R Lovvorn1, Jacqueline M Grebmeier, Lee W Cooper, Joseph K Bump, Samantha E Richman.   

Abstract

Delineating protected areas for sensitive species is a growing challenge as changing climate alters the geographic pattern of habitats as well as human responses to those shifts. When human impacts are expected within projected ranges of threatened species, there is often demand to demarcate the minimum habitat required to ensure the species' persistence. Because diminished or wide-ranging populations may not occupy all viable (and needed) habitat at once, one must identify thresholds of resources that will support the species even in unoccupied areas. Long-term data on the shifting mosaic of critical resources may indicate ranges of future variability. We addressed these issues for the Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri), a federally threatened species that winters in pack ice of the Bering Sea. Changing climate has decreased ice cover and severely reduced the eiders' benthic prey and has increased prospects for expansion of bottom trawling that may further affect prey communities. To assess long-term changes in habitats that will support eiders, we linked data on benthic prey, sea ice, and weather from 1970 to 2001 with a spatially explicit simulation model of eider energy balance that integrated field, laboratory, and remote-sensing studies. Areas estimated to have prey densities adequate for eiders in 1970-1974 did not include most areas that were viable 20 years later (1993-1994). Unless the entire area with adequate prey in 1993-1994 had been protected, the much reduced viable area in 1999-2001 might well have been excluded. During long non-foraging periods (as at night), eiders can save much energy by resting on ice vs. floating on water; thus, loss of ice cover in the future might substantially decrease the area in which prey densities are adequate to offset the eiders' energy needs. For wide-ranging benthivores such as eiders, our results emphasize that fixed protected areas based on current conditions can be too small or inflexible to subsume long-term shifts in habitat conditions. Better knowledge of patterns of natural disturbance experienced by prey communities, and appropriate allocation of human disturbance over seasons or years, may yield alternative strategies to large-scale closures that may be politically and economically problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19769106     DOI: 10.1890/08-1193.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Protected areas facilitate species' range expansions.

Authors:  Chris D Thomas; Phillipa K Gillingham; Richard B Bradbury; David B Roy; Barbara J Anderson; John M Baxter; Nigel A D Bourn; Humphrey Q P Crick; Richard A Findon; Richard Fox; Jenny A Hodgson; Alison R Holt; Mike D Morecroft; Nina J O'Hanlon; Tom H Oliver; James W Pearce-Higgins; Deborah A Procter; Jeremy A Thomas; Kevin J Walker; Clive A Walmsley; Robert J Wilson; Jane K Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Arctic sea ice a major determinant in Mandt's black guillemot movement and distribution during non-breeding season.

Authors:  G J Divoky; D C Douglas; I J Stenhouse
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Effects of sea ice on Arctic biota: an emerging crisis discipline.

Authors:  Marc Macias-Fauria; Eric Post
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Drag-based 'hovering' in ducks: the hydrodynamics and energetic cost of bottom feeding.

Authors:  Gal Ribak; John G Swallow; David R Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) resource selection in the Northern Bering Sea.

Authors:  Chadwick V Jay; Jacqueline M Grebmeier; Anthony S Fischbach; Trent L McDonald; Lee W Cooper; Fawn Hornsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Where to Forage in the Absence of Sea Ice? Bathymetry As a Key Factor for an Arctic Seabird.

Authors:  Françoise Amélineau; David Grémillet; Delphine Bonnet; Tangi Le Bot; Jérôme Fort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An assessment of climate change vulnerability for Important Bird Areas in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Arc.

Authors:  Melanie A Smith; Benjamin K Sullender; William C Koeppen; Kathy J Kuletz; Heather M Renner; Aaron J Poe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Parasites of seabirds: A survey of effects and ecological implications.

Authors:  Junaid S Khan; Jennifer F Provencher; Mark R Forbes; Mark L Mallory; Camille Lebarbenchon; Karen D McCoy
Journal:  Adv Mar Biol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.143

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.