Literature DB >> 19769105

When can efforts to control nuisance and invasive species backfire?

Elise F Zipkin1, Clifford E Kraft, Evan G Cooch, Patrick J Sullivan.   

Abstract

Population control through harvest has the potential to reduce the abundance of nuisance and invasive species. However, demographic structure and density-dependent processes can confound removal efforts and lead to undesirable consequences, such as overcompensation (an increase in abundance in response to harvest) and instability (population cycling or chaos). Recent empirical studies have demonstrated the potential for increased mortality (such as that caused by harvest) to lead to overcompensation and instability in plant, insect, and fish populations. We developed a general population model with juvenile and adult stages to help determine the conditions under which control harvest efforts can produce unintended outcomes. Analytical and simulation analyses of the model demonstrated that the potential for overcompensation as a result of harvest was significant for species with high fecundity, even when annual stage-specific survivorship values were fairly low. Population instability as a result of harvest occurred less frequently and was only possible with harvest strategies that targeted adults when both fecundity and adult survivorship were high. We considered these results in conjunction with current literature on nuisance and invasive species to propose general guidelines for assessing the risks associated with control harvest based on life history characteristics of target populations. Our results suggest that species with high per capita fecundity (over discrete breeding periods), short juvenile stages, and fairly constant survivorship rates are most likely to respond undesirably to harvest. It is difficult to determine the extent to which overcompensation and instability could occur during real-world removal efforts, and more empirical removal studies should be undertaken to evaluate population-level responses to control harvests. Nevertheless, our results identify key issues that have been seldom acknowledged and are potentially generic across taxa.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19769105     DOI: 10.1890/08-1467.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  14 in total

1.  The hydra effect, bubbles, and chaos in a simple discrete population model with constant effort harvesting.

Authors:  Eduardo Liz; Alfonso Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  The hydra effect in predator-prey models.

Authors:  Michael Sieber; Frank M Hilker
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Effects of larval density on a natural population of Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae): No evidence of compensatory mortality.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Ower; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.465

4.  Density dependence in demography and dispersal generates fluctuating invasion speeds.

Authors:  Lauren L Sullivan; Bingtuan Li; Tom E X Miller; Michael G Neubert; Allison K Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Focusing ecological research for conservation.

Authors:  Bogdan Cristescu; Mark S Boyce
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  The control of an invasive bivalve, Corbicula fluminea, using gas impermeable benthic barriers in a large natural lake.

Authors:  Marion E Wittmann; Sudeep Chandra; John E Reuter; S Geoffrey Schladow; Brant C Allen; Katie J Webb
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Finding the sweet spot: What levels of larval mortality lead to compensation or overcompensation in adult production?

Authors:  Joseph T Neale; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.171

8.  How can mortality increase population size? A test of two mechanistic hypotheses.

Authors:  Kristina M McIntire; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Predation yields greater population performance: What are the contributions of density- and trait-mediated effects?

Authors:  Joseph T Neale; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ecol Entomol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.465

10.  Stage-specific overcompensation, the hydra effect, and the failure to eradicate an invasive predator.

Authors:  Edwin Grosholz; Gail Ashton; Marko Bradley; Chris Brown; Lina Ceballos-Osuna; Andrew Chang; Catherine de Rivera; Julie Gonzalez; Marcella Heineke; Michelle Marraffini; Linda McCann; Erica Pollard; Ian Pritchard; Gregory Ruiz; Brian Turner; Carolyn Tepolt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.