Literature DB >> 19767865

Abundance of culturable versus viable Escherichia coli in freshwater.

Pierre Servais1, Josué Prats, Julien Passerat, Tamara Garcia-Armisen.   

Abstract

Approved methods traditionally used for Escherichia coli enumeration in waters are culture-based. However, these methods can underestimate the E. coli abundance in aquatic systems because they do not take into account cells that remain viable but have lost the ability to grow in or on culture media. We investigated, in freshwater samples, the abundance of (i) culturable E. coli, enumerated by the most probable number microplate method and (ii) viable E. coli, estimated using a procedure called DVC-FISH, which couples fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and a viability testing technique (direct viable count (DVC)). The ratio of culturable to viable E. coli was close to 1 in highly contaminated waters (samples with a high concentration of culturable E. coli), but decreased drastically for weakly contaminated samples. This indicates a large fraction of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) E. coli in the latter samples. Microcosm experiments showed that some environmental factors, such as nutrient scarcity and solar irradiation, could lead to the presence of a high proportion of VBNC E. coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19767865     DOI: 10.1139/w09-043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  8 in total

1.  Correlations between cyanobacterial density and bacterial transformation to the viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state in four freshwater water bodies.

Authors:  Huirong Chen; Ju Shen; Gaoshan Pan; Jing Liu; Jiancheng Li; Zhangli Hu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Induction and resuscitation of the viable but nonculturable state in a cyanobacteria-lysing bacterium isolated from cyanobacterial bloom.

Authors:  Huirong Chen; Lixian Fu; Lingxi Luo; Jun Lu; W Lindsey White; Zhangli Hu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Separation of Escherichia coli from natural samples for identification of sources and microcosm inoculation.

Authors:  Marcos Tavares Carneiro; Daniel Vidal Perez; Renato Castiglia Feitosa; Julio Cesar Wasserman
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Faecal contamination of water and sediment in the rivers of the Scheldt drainage network.

Authors:  Nouho Koffi Ouattara; Julien Passerat; Pierre Servais
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Defining established and emerging microbial risks in the aquatic environment: current knowledge, implications, and outlooks.

Authors:  Neil J Rowan
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-27

6.  How does the cladoceran Daphnia pulex affect the fate of Escherichia coli in water?

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Burnet; Tarek Faraj; Henry-Michel Cauchie; Célia Joaquim-Justo; Pierre Servais; Michèle Prévost; Sarah M Dorner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  An African perspective on the prevalence, fate and effects of carbapenem resistance genes in hospital effluents and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) final effluents: A critical review.

Authors:  Kingsley Ehi Ebomah; Anthony Ifeanyi Okoh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-07

Review 8.  Pathogens protection against the action of disinfectants in multispecies biofilms.

Authors:  Pilar Sanchez-Vizuete; Belen Orgaz; Stéphane Aymerich; Dominique Le Coq; Romain Briandet
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.