Literature DB >> 19766942

Evaluation of an intervention program for anxious adolescent boys who are bullied at school.

Kathryn Berry1, Caroline J Hunt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study tested the efficacy of an intervention for anxious adolescent boys experiencing bullying at school. The cognitive-behavioral intervention focused on targeting individual factors that appear to increase an adolescent's vulnerability to bullying experiences such as anxiety, low self-esteem, and use of maladaptive coping strategies.
METHODS: Adolescent boys reporting anxiety symptoms and the recent experience of being bullied at school (grades 7-10) were randomly assigned by group to intervention (n = 22) or wait-list (n = 24) conditions. Depressive and anxiety symptoms and bullying experiences were measured before and after the intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up for the intervention condition.
RESULTS: The intervention was effective in significantly reducing adolescent's bullying experiences as well as their anxiety, depression, and the degree of distress associated with being bullied. Intervention gains were maintained at the 3-month follow-up. The intervention was not effective in enhancing adolescent's self-esteem or changing aggressive or avoidant responses to bullying situations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary support for the value of individually focused interventions for boys in the effort to reduce the incidence of bullying within schools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19766942     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  8 in total

1.  Commentary: guiding a public health approach to bullying.

Authors:  Bruno J Anthony; Stephen L Wessler; Joyce K Sebian
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2010-09-28

2.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Universal School-Based Depression Prevention Program for Adolescents.

Authors:  Justin D Tomyn; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Ben Richardson; Lucia Colla
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-11

3.  The Campbell Collaboration's systematic review of school-based anti-bullying interventions does not meet mandatory methodological standards.

Authors:  Julia H Littell; Dennis M Gorman
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 4.  Where to go from here? An exploratory meta-analysis of the most promising approaches to depression prevention programs for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah E Hetrick; Georgina R Cox; Sally N Merry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Interventions on bullying and cyberbullying in schools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elisa Cantone; Anna P Piras; Marcello Vellante; Antonello Preti; Sigrun Daníelsdóttir; Ernesto D'Aloja; Sigita Lesinskiene; Mathhias C Angermeyer; Mauro G Carta; Dinesh Bhugra
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  The Effects of a Skill-Based Intervention for Victims of Bullying in Brazil.

Authors:  Jorge Luiz da Silva; Wanderlei Abadio de Oliveira; Iara Falleiros Braga; Marilurdes Silva Farias; Elisangela Aparecida da Silva Lizzi; Marlene Fagundes Carvalho Gonçalves; Beatriz Oliveira Pereira; Marta Angélica Iossi Silva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Barriers and facilitators to targeted anxiety prevention programmes in families at risk: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  P J Lawrence; K Harvey; C Williams; C Creswell
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), third-wave CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT) based interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah E Hetrick; Georgina R Cox; Katrina G Witt; Julliet J Bir; Sally N Merry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.