Literature DB >> 19766660

Light-dependent orientation responses in animals can be explained by a model of compass cue integration.

Kenneth Kragh Jensen1.   

Abstract

The magnetic compass sense of animals is currently thought to be based on light-dependent processes like the proposed radical pair mechanism. In accordance, many animals show orientation responses that depend on light. However, the orientation responses depend on the wavelength and irradiance of monochromatic light in rather complex ways that cannot be explained directly by the radical pair mechanism. Here, a radically different model is presented that can explain a vast majority of the complex observed light-dependent responses. The model put forward an integration process consisting of simple lateral inhibition between a normal functioning, light-independent magnetic compass (e.g. magnetite based) and a vision based skylight color gradient compass that misperceives compass cues in monochromatic light. Integration of the misperceived color compass cue and the normal magnetic compass not only explains most of the categorically different light-dependent orientation responses, but also shows a surprisingly good fit to how well the animals are oriented (r-values) under light of different wavelength and irradiance. The model parsimoniously suggests the existence of a single magnetic sense in birds (probably based on magnetic crystals).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19766660     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jeremy Shaw; Alastair Boyd; Michael House; Robert Woodward; Falko Mathes; Gary Cowin; Martin Saunders; Boris Baer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in amphibians and insects: candidate receptors and candidate molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  John B Phillips; Paulo E Jorge; Rachel Muheim
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Sensation to navigation: a computational neuroscience approach to magnetic field navigation.

Authors:  Sebastian Nichols; Luke Havens; Brian Taylor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Magnetoreception in eusocial insects: an update.

Authors:  Eliane Wajnberg; Daniel Acosta-Avalos; Odivaldo Cambraia Alves; Jandira Ferreira de Oliveira; Robert B Srygley; Darci M S Esquivel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Long-distance transequatorial navigation using sequential measurements of magnetic inclination angle.

Authors:  Brian K Taylor; Kenneth J Lohmann; Luke T Havens; Catherine M F Lohmann; Jesse Granger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Biophysics of magnetic orientation: strengthening the interface between theory and experimental design.

Authors:  Joseph L Kirschvink; Michael Winklhofer; Michael M Walker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.