Julie Brossaud1, Jean-Benoît Corcuff. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Bordeaux, France. julie.brossaud@u-bordeaux2.fr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary hyperaldosteronism diagnosis is helped by assaying renin concentrations either by immunodetection (active renin) or by enzymatic reaction followed by angiotensin I immunoassay (plasma renin activity). We investigated the impact of pre-analytical and analytical conditions on a PRA assay. METHODS: PRA was assayed using a commercial kit. Firstly, a retrospective analysis of PRA results from 1yr was performed. Secondly, the impact of pre-analytical temperature conveyance/storage of samples was tested (4 and 25 degrees C). Thirdly, 2 durations of enzymatic reaction 1.5 and 18h were tested. RESULTS: Retrospectively, 9.5% samples displayed elevated "blanks": calculating PRA with or without "blank" subtraction elicited a difference of >10% in 1/3 samples. There was a significant decrease of PRA values in samples left at 25 degrees C vs 4 degrees C (50% "blank" increase). Finally, the longer the enzymatic reaction (1.5 vs 18h), the higher the production of angiotensin I and the better the PRA assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We propose a 2 step procedure: a brief 1.5h enzymatic reaction time followed by a prolonged reaction (18h) only if PRA is <0.2ng mL(-1) h(-1). We would recommend performing "blank" samples for the brief enzymatic reaction time. Finally, conveyance/storage temperature does modify PRA results albeit in our hands this had little clinical impact.
BACKGROUND:Primary hyperaldosteronism diagnosis is helped by assaying renin concentrations either by immunodetection (active renin) or by enzymatic reaction followed by angiotensin I immunoassay (plasma renin activity). We investigated the impact of pre-analytical and analytical conditions on a PRA assay. METHODS: PRA was assayed using a commercial kit. Firstly, a retrospective analysis of PRA results from 1yr was performed. Secondly, the impact of pre-analytical temperature conveyance/storage of samples was tested (4 and 25 degrees C). Thirdly, 2 durations of enzymatic reaction 1.5 and 18h were tested. RESULTS: Retrospectively, 9.5% samples displayed elevated "blanks": calculating PRA with or without "blank" subtraction elicited a difference of >10% in 1/3 samples. There was a significant decrease of PRA values in samples left at 25 degrees C vs 4 degrees C (50% "blank" increase). Finally, the longer the enzymatic reaction (1.5 vs 18h), the higher the production of angiotensin I and the better the PRA assay sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We propose a 2 step procedure: a brief 1.5h enzymatic reaction time followed by a prolonged reaction (18h) only if PRA is <0.2ng mL(-1) h(-1). We would recommend performing "blank" samples for the brief enzymatic reaction time. Finally, conveyance/storage temperature does modify PRA results albeit in our hands this had little clinical impact.
Authors: Linda S Pescatello; Elizabeth D Schifano; Garrett I Ash; Gregory A Panza; Lauren M L Corso; Ming-Hui Chen; Ved Deshpande; Amanda Zaleski; Burak Cilhoroz; Paulo Farinatti; Beth A Taylor; Rachel J O'Neill; Paul D Thompson Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-11
Authors: Linda S Pescatello; Elizabeth D Schifano; Garrett I Ash; Gregory A Panza; Lauren Lamberti; Ming-Hui Chen; Ved Deshpande; Amanda Zaleski; Paulo Farinatti; Beth A Taylor; Paul D Thompson Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2016-10-10
Authors: Angela C Rutledge; Anna Johnston; Dana Bailey; Ronald A Booth; Pamela Edmond; Victor Leung; Kika Veljkovic Journal: Pract Lab Med Date: 2021-04-23