PURPOSE: Chondroitin sulfate (Stellar Pharmaceuticals, London, Ontario, Canada), which is less expensive and more inert than heparinoids, hyaluronan or pentosan polysulfate, has been introduced to restore the barrier function lost due to epithelial dysfunction in interstitial cystitis cases. To our knowledge chondroitin sulfate binding to damaged bladder as a function of the urinary pH range, its efficacy in restoring the bladder permeability barrier and the capacity of the damaged bladder to bind chondroitin sulfate have not been determined previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chondroitin sulfate binding to bladder urothelium was investigated quantitatively using chondroitin sulfate highly labeled with Texas Red(R) and quantitative fluorescence microscopy in a mouse model of urothelial acid damage. The efficacy of restoring barrier function was determined using the passage of intravesically instilled (86)Rb, a potassium ion mimetic, through the urothelium into the bloodstream in a rat model of bladder damage. The binding capacity of acid damaged bladder was determined by fluorometry. RESULTS: Chondroitin sulfate bound tightly and exclusively to the mouse bladder surface damaged by acid but showed only minimal binding to undamaged bladder. There was no systematic variation in pH. The model showed some variability in the degree of damage induced. In rats chondroitin sulfate instillation restored permeability to (86)Rb to control levels. Binding was saturable at a mean +/- SEM 0.67 +/- 0.13 mg/cm(2) of the bladder surface. CONCLUSIONS: Chondroitin sulfate binds preferentially to damaged urothelium and restores the impermeability barrier. This suggests that the glycosaminoglycan layer is a major contributor to bladder urothelial impermeability. As determined by binding capacity, the dose applied in humans in Canada (400 mg per instillation) is sufficient to achieve maximum efficacy.
PURPOSE:Chondroitin sulfate (Stellar Pharmaceuticals, London, Ontario, Canada), which is less expensive and more inert than heparinoids, hyaluronan or pentosan polysulfate, has been introduced to restore the barrier function lost due to epithelial dysfunction in interstitial cystitis cases. To our knowledge chondroitin sulfate binding to damaged bladder as a function of the urinary pH range, its efficacy in restoring the bladder permeability barrier and the capacity of the damaged bladder to bind chondroitin sulfate have not been determined previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Chondroitin sulfate binding to bladder urothelium was investigated quantitatively using chondroitin sulfate highly labeled with Texas Red(R) and quantitative fluorescence microscopy in a mouse model of urothelial acid damage. The efficacy of restoring barrier function was determined using the passage of intravesically instilled (86)Rb, a potassium ion mimetic, through the urothelium into the bloodstream in a rat model of bladder damage. The binding capacity of acid damaged bladder was determined by fluorometry. RESULTS:Chondroitin sulfate bound tightly and exclusively to the mouse bladder surface damaged by acid but showed only minimal binding to undamaged bladder. There was no systematic variation in pH. The model showed some variability in the degree of damage induced. In ratschondroitin sulfate instillation restored permeability to (86)Rb to control levels. Binding was saturable at a mean +/- SEM 0.67 +/- 0.13 mg/cm(2) of the bladder surface. CONCLUSIONS:Chondroitin sulfate binds preferentially to damaged urothelium and restores the impermeability barrier. This suggests that the glycosaminoglycan layer is a major contributor to bladder urothelial impermeability. As determined by binding capacity, the dose applied in humans in Canada (400 mg per instillation) is sufficient to achieve maximum efficacy.
Authors: Paul J Hauser; Mikhail G Dozmorov; Barbara L Bane; Gennady Slobodov; Daniel J Culkin; Robert E Hurst Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gennady Slobodov; Michael Feloney; Christopher Gran; Kimberly D Kyker; Robert E Hurst; Daniel J Culkin Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Robert E Hurst; Samuel Van Gordon; Karl Tyler; Bradley Kropp; Rheal Towner; HsuehKung Lin; John O Marentette; Jane McHowat; Ehsan Mohammedi; Beverley Greenwood-Van Meerveld Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2016-02-24
Authors: James I Griffin; Siu Kit Kevin Cheng; Tomoko Hayashi; Dennis Carson; Manju Saraswathy; Devatha P Nair; Dmitri Simberg Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 5.307
Authors: Christopher D Engles; Paul J Hauser; Shivon N Abdullah; Daniel J Culkin; Robert E Hurst Journal: Urology Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Susan Keay; Samantha Leitzell; Ashley Ochrzcin; George Clements; Min Zhan; David Johnson Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Rebecca R Foster; Lynne Armstrong; Siân Baker; Dickson W L Wong; Emma C Wylie; Raina Ramnath; Robert Jenkins; Anurag Singh; Robert Steadman; Gavin I Welsh; Peter W Mathieson; Simon C Satchell Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 4.307