Literature DB >> 19765742

Differences in initial benign prostatic hyperplasia management between primary care physicians and urologists.

John M Hollingsworth1, Brent K Hollenbeck, Stephanie Daignault, Simon P Kim, John T Wei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The introduction of efficacious pharmacotherapies has effectively transformed benign prostatic hyperplasia into a chronic disease that requires ongoing medical care. With this transformation primary care physicians have become more involved in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The impact of the increasing role of the primary care physician on the use of benign prostatic hyperplasia related health services remains unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using medical claims from a nonprofit managed care organization. Between 1997 and 2005 we identified incident cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia and the provider responsible for the initial care. We fitted logistic regression models to measure the association between subject receipt of an evaluative process and the treating physician specialty. Furthermore, we examined differences between primary care physicians and urologists with respect to the use of medical therapy.
RESULTS: Less than a third of incident cases received initial care from a urologist. Use of office based procedures and urodynamic tests was exclusive to urology. Urologists performed urinalysis testing and transrectal ultrasonography more frequently than primary care physicians (p <0.001). The odds of having a laboratory study doubled with treatment by a urologist (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.51-2.74). Men seen by a urologist were also more likely to be prescribed a benign prostatic hyperplasia medication (p <0.001). Among those who received medical therapy, prescription of selective alpha-adrenergic blockers, 5alpha-reductase inhibitors and combination therapy was higher among urologists (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: On average, urologists had a higher intensity practice style for benign prostatic hyperplasia than primary care physicians. Further studies are needed to determine how these practice style differences relate to patient clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19765742     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Changes in initial expenditures for benign prostatic hyperplasia evaluation in the Medicare population: a comparison to overall Medicare inflation.

Authors:  Adam S Bellinger; Sean P Elliott; Liu Yang; John T Wei; Christopher S Saigal; Alexandria Smith; Timothy J Wilt; Seth A Strope
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Urologist compliance with AUA best practice guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Medicare population.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Sean P Elliott; Christopher S Saigal; Alex Smith; Timothy J Wilt; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Differences in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Comparing the Primary Care Physician and the Urologist.

Authors:  Adam J Rensing; Adrienne Kuxhausen; Joel Vetter; Seth A Strope
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-05

4.  Urologist practice styles in the initial evaluation of elderly men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Seth A Strope; Sean P Elliott; Alex Smith; John T Wei; Timothy J Wilt; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Mohamed Bishr; Katharina Boehm; Vincent Trudeau; Zhe Tian; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Jonas Schiffmann; Claudio Jeldres; Maxine Sun; Sharokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Fred Saad; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Tamsulosin dispensation patterns in the United States: a real-world, longitudinal, population claims database analysis.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava; Anna E Verbeek; Jan M Wruck; Marc Gittelman
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-08

7.  Potential Savings in Medicare Part D for Common Urological Conditions.

Authors:  Peter S Kirk; Tudor Borza; James M Dupree; John T Wei; Chad Ellimoottil; Megan E V Caram; Mary Burkhardt; Joel J Heidelbaugh; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ted A Skolarus
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2018-09

Review 8.  Lower urinary tract symptoms in men.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 9.  Patient centred care for the medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic obstruction: a key point to improve patients' care - a systematic review.

Authors:  Cosimo De Nunzio; Fabrizio Presicce; Riccardo Lombardo; Alberto Trucchi; Mariangela Bellangino; Andrea Tubaro; Egidio Moja
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.