AIM: This study was designed to clarify the current measurement performance of 7 reagent manufacturers for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and triglycerides (TG) specified for the metabolic syndrome (MetS)-focused health checkups program in Japan. METHODS: Twenty HDLC, 21 LDLC and 9 TG analytical reagent/instrument/calibrator systems (system), and combinations of reagent lots, instrument models and calibrator lots, underwent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) lipid standardization. Eighty and 100% systems were requested to achieve an accuracy of within +/-1% and +/-2% of the reference value, so that a clinical laboratory can meet the CDC criteria. RESULTS: The CDC performance criteria of HDLC, LDLC and TG require an accuracy of within +/-5%, +/-4% and +/-5%, respectively. For HDLC, all 20 systems met the criteria. Fourteen (70.0%) and 18 (90.0%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. For LDLC, 14 (66.7%) of 21 systems met the criteria, but 7 (33.3%) failed. Five (23.8%) and 17 (81.0%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. For TG, 8 of 9 systems met the criteria. Two (22.2%) and 4 (44.4%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. The minimum and maximum differences of a specified sample among manufacturers were 1.6 and 11.0 mg/dL for HDLC, 7.8 and 33.0 mg/dL for LDLC, and 2.8 and 27.4 mg/dL for TG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Homogeneous HDLC methods are acceptable for MetS, but further accuracy improvement of homogeneous LDLC and TG methods will be needed because of their poor performance.
AIM: This study was designed to clarify the current measurement performance of 7 reagent manufacturers for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and triglycerides (TG) specified for the metabolic syndrome (MetS)-focused health checkups program in Japan. METHODS: Twenty HDLC, 21 LDLC and 9 TG analytical reagent/instrument/calibrator systems (system), and combinations of reagent lots, instrument models and calibrator lots, underwent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) lipid standardization. Eighty and 100% systems were requested to achieve an accuracy of within +/-1% and +/-2% of the reference value, so that a clinical laboratory can meet the CDC criteria. RESULTS: The CDC performance criteria of HDLC, LDLC and TG require an accuracy of within +/-5%, +/-4% and +/-5%, respectively. For HDLC, all 20 systems met the criteria. Fourteen (70.0%) and 18 (90.0%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. For LDLC, 14 (66.7%) of 21 systems met the criteria, but 7 (33.3%) failed. Five (23.8%) and 17 (81.0%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. For TG, 8 of 9 systems met the criteria. Two (22.2%) and 4 (44.4%) systems were within +/-1% and +/-2%, respectively. The minimum and maximum differences of a specified sample among manufacturers were 1.6 and 11.0 mg/dL for HDLC, 7.8 and 33.0 mg/dL for LDLC, and 2.8 and 27.4 mg/dL for TG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Homogeneous HDLC methods are acceptable for MetS, but further accuracy improvement of homogeneous LDLC and TG methods will be needed because of their poor performance.