Literature DB >> 19762825

Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: feeding, ruminating, and lying behavior.

T J DeVries1, K A Beauchemin, F Dohme, K S Schwartzkopf-Genswein.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine whether the susceptibility to ruminal acidosis, as defined through differences in days in milk (DIM), milk production level, and ration composition, influences cow feeding, ruminating, and lying behavior and whether these behaviors change during an acute bout of ruminal acidosis. Eight ruminally cannulated cows were assigned to 1 of 2 acidosis risk levels: low risk (LR, mid-lactation cows fed a 60:40 forage:concentrate ratio diet) or high risk (HR, early lactation cows fed a 45:55 forage:concentrate diet). As a result, diets were intentionally confounded with DIM and milk production to represent 2 different acidosis risk scenarios. Cows were exposed to an acidosis challenge in each of three 14-d periods. Each period consisted of 3 baseline days, a feed restriction day (restricting total mixed ration to 50% of ad libitum intake), an acidosis challenge day (1 h meal of 4 kg of ground barley/wheat before allocating the total mixed ration), and a recovery phase. Feeding, rumination, and standing/lying behavior were recorded for 2 baseline days, on the challenge day, and 1 and 4 d after the challenge day for each cow. Across the study, there were no differences in measures of standing, lying, or feeding behavior between the 2 groups of cows. The HR cows did, on average, spend less time ruminating (491 vs. 555 min/d) than the LR cows, resulting in a lesser percentage of observed cows ruminating across the day (44.6 vs. 48.1%). The acidosis challenge resulted in changes in behavior in all cows. Compared with the baseline, feeding time increased on the first day after the challenge (395 vs. 310 min/d), whereas lying time decreased (565 vs. 634 min/d). Rumination time decreased the first day following the challenge (436 min/d) relative to the baseline (533 min/d), but increased the following day (572 min/d). Fewer cows were observed to be ruminating at a given time on the first day following the challenge as compared with the baseline period. Despite this, on a herd level, numerous observations of the proportion of cows ruminating at any one time would need to be taken to accurately detect an acute bout of acidosis using changes in rumination behavior. Overall, these results suggest that risk of acidosis may have little overall effect on general behavior, with the exception of rumination. Furthermore, an acute bout of acidosis alters behavioral patterns of lactating dairy cows, particularly rumination behavior, and identification of these changes in behavior through repeated measurements may assist in the detection of an acidosis event within a herd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762825     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  16 in total

1.  Fan cooling of the resting area in a free stalls dairy barn.

Authors:  Ferdinando Calegari; Luigi Calamari; Ermes Frazzi
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Subacute ruminal acidosis and evaluation of blood gas analysis in dairy cow.

Authors:  Matteo Gianesella; Massimo Morgante; Chiara Cannizzo; Annalisa Stefani; Paolo Dalvit; Vanessa Messina; Elisabetta Giudice
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-09-29

3.  Cooling systems of the resting area in free stall dairy barn.

Authors:  F Calegari; L Calamari; E Frazzi
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Anti-lipopolysaccharide antibody administration mitigates ruminal lipopolysaccharide release and depression of ruminal pH during subacute ruminal acidosis challenge in Holstein bull cattle.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mizuguchi; Tomoki Ikeda; Yumi Watanabe; Shiro Kushibiki; Kentaro Ikuta; Yo-Han Kim; Shigeru Sato
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Monitoring cow comfort and rumen health indices in a cubicle-housed herd with an automatic milking system: a repeated measures approach.

Authors:  Arne Vanhoudt; Steven van Winden; John C Fishwick; Nicholas J Bell
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Do bells affect behaviour and heart rate variability in grazing dairy cows?

Authors:  Julia Johns; Antonia Patt; Edna Hillmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lameness Affects Cow Feeding But Not Rumination Behavior as Characterized from Sensor Data.

Authors:  Vivi M Thorup; Birte L Nielsen; Pierre-Emmanuel Robert; Sylvie Giger-Reverdin; Jakub Konka; Craig Michie; Nicolas C Friggens
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-05-10

8.  Unraveling the Relationship between Milk Yield and Quality at the Test Day with Rumination Time Recorded by a PLF Technology.

Authors:  Rosanna Marino; Francesca Petrera; Marisanna Speroni; Teresa Rutigliano; Andrea Galli; Fabio Abeni
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Identification of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Liver in Response to Subacute Ruminal Acidosis (SARA) Induced by High-concentrate Diet.

Authors:  X Y Jiang; Y D Ni; S K Zhang; Y S Zhang; X Z Shen
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 10.  Can rumination time and some blood biochemical parameters be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis of subclinical acidosis and subclinical ketosis?

Authors:  R Antanaitis; V Juozaitienė; D Malašauskienė; M Televičius
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2019-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.