Literature DB >> 19762515

Examining the involvement of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in tumor proliferation (erythropoietin receptors, receptor binding, signal transduction), angiogenesis, and venous thromboembolic events.

Joachim Fandrey1, Mario Dicato.   

Abstract

Safety concerns have arisen about the possibility of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) promoting tumor growth and increasing the incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Because of the reported presence of erythropoietin receptors (EPORs) on tumor cells, it was questioned if ESAs had the potential for promoting tumor growth through stimulation of EPORs and tumor vessels and/or enhanced tumor oxygenation. Studies have shown that EPOR mRNA can be isolated from tumor cells, but the presence of EPOR protein has not yet been proven because of a lack of specific antibodies against EPORs. It is questionable whether EPORs on tumor cells are functional and there is no evidence that ESAs (within the approved indication in patients receiving chemotherapy) can stimulate EPORs on tumor cells in vivo. VTEs are frequent in cancer patients, resulting from the effects of malignant disease, cancer treatments, and comorbidities. VTEs are a leading cause of death in cancer patients. There are concerns about ESAs and a possible higher risk for VTEs and shorter survival in cancer patients. The higher risk for VTEs associated with ESAs appears to be a class effect, but the risk may be particularly pronounced when ESAs are used off label, as seen in clinical trials that targeted hemoglobin levels higher than those recommended by current ESA labeling and trials that enrolled patients who were not anemic at baseline. ESA treatment should be used within labeling confines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762515     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-S1-34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  7 in total

1.  Transfusion risk in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia when initiating darbepoetin alfa therapy at a baseline hemoglobin level of <9 g/dL versus 9 to <10 g/dL versus ≥ 10 g/dL: an exploratory analysis of a phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Canon; Johan Vansteenkiste; Michael Hedenus; Pere Gascon; Carsten Bokemeyer; Heinz Ludwig; Jan Vermorken; Jason Legg; Beatriz Pujol; Ken Bridges
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: the present situation.

Authors:  Mario Dicato
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Promises and pitfalls in erythopoietin-mediated tissue protection: are nonerythropoietic derivatives a way forward?

Authors:  Carla Cerami Hand; Michael Brines
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Erythropoietin doping in cycling: lack of evidence for efficacy and a negative risk-benefit.

Authors:  Jules A A C Heuberger; Joost M Cohen Tervaert; Femke M L Schepers; Adriaan D B Vliegenthart; Joris I Rotmans; Johannes M A Daniels; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Erythropoietin supports the survival of prostate cancer, but not growth and bone metastasis.

Authors:  Yusuke Shiozawa; Samantha McGee; Michael J Pienta; Natalie McGregor; Younghun Jung; Kenji Yumoto; Jingcheng Wang; Janice E Berry; Kenneth J Pienta; Russell S Taichman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Randomised, phase III trial of epoetin-β to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia according to the EU regulation.

Authors:  Y Fujisaka; T Sugiyama; H Saito; S Nagase; S Kudoh; M Endo; H Sakai; Y Ohashi; N Saijo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The effect of erythropoietin on normal and neoplastic cells.

Authors:  Steve Elliott; Angus M Sinclair
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2012-06-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.