Literature DB >> 19762495

Six-month prophylaxis is cost effective in transplant patients at high risk for cytomegalovirus infection.

Fu L Luan1, Linda J Stuckey, Jeong M Park, Daniel Kaul, Diane Cibrik, Akinlolu Ojo.   

Abstract

The risk of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a concern in seronegative kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients of seropositive organs despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis. The optimal duration of prophylaxis is unknown. We studied the cost effectiveness of 6- versus 3-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir. A total of 222 seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants received valganciclovir prophylaxis for either 3 or 6 mo during two consecutive time periods. We assessed the incidence of CMV infection and disease 12 mo after completion of prophylaxis and performed cost-effectiveness analyses. The overall incidence of CMV infection and disease was 26.7% and 24.4% in the 3-mo group and 20.9% and 12.1% in the 6-mo group, respectively. Six-month prophylaxis was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk for CMV disease (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.72), but not infection (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.14). Cost-effectiveness analyses showed that 6-mo prophylaxis combined with a one-time viremia determination at the end of the prophylaxis period incurred an incremental cost of $34,362 and $16,215 per case of infection and disease avoided, respectively, and $8,304 per one quality adjusted life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses supported the cost effectiveness of 6-mo prophylaxis over a wide range of valganciclovir and hospital costs, as well as variation in the incidence of CMV disease. In summary, 6-mo prophylaxis with valganciclovir combined with a one-time determination of viremia is cost effective in reducing CMV infection and disease in seronegative recipients of seropositive kidney and/or pancreas transplants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19762495      PMCID: PMC2799179          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008111166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  34 in total

1.  Cytomegalovirus DNA concentration in plasma predicts development of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  H Rollag; S Sagedal; K I Kristiansen; D Kvale; E Holter; M Degré; K P Nordal
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in thymoglobulin-treated transplant patients with 6 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis.

Authors:  Enver Akalin; Jonathan S Bromberg; Vinita Sehgal; Scott Ames; Barbara Murphy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  The association of cytomegalovirus sero-pairing with outcomes and costs following cadaveric renal transplantation prior to the introduction of oral ganciclovir CMV prophylaxis.

Authors:  Mark A Schnitzler; Jeffrey A Lowell; Karen L Hardinger; Stuart B Boxerman; Thomas C Bailey; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Carlos Paya; Atul Humar; Ed Dominguez; Kenneth Washburn; Emily Blumberg; Barbara Alexander; Richard Freeman; Nigel Heaton; Mark D Pescovitz
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Valganciclovir results in improved oral absorption of ganciclovir in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  M D Pescovitz; J Rabkin; R M Merion; C V Paya; J Pirsch; R B Freeman; J O'Grady; C Robinson; Z To; K Wren; L Banken; W Buhles; F Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Valaciclovir prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplantation: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  C M Legendre; D J Norman; M R Keating; G D Maclaine; D M Grant
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Effects of changing immunosuppressive regimen on the incidence, duration, and viral load of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation: a single center report.

Authors:  E F de Maar; E A M Verschuuren; J J Homan vd Heide; D M Kas-Deelen; D Jagernath; T H The; R J Ploeg; W J van Son
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk transplant recipients despite ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis.

Authors:  Enver Akalin; Vinita Sehgal; Scott Ames; Sabera Hossain; Lisa Daly; Murphy Barbara; Jonathan S Bromberg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Valacyclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive valganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation.

Authors:  T Reischig; P Jindra; O Hes; M Svecová; J Klaboch; V Treska
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The impact of cytomegalovirus infection and disease on rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  Solbjørg Sagedal; Knut P Nordal; Anders Hartmann; Ståle Sund; Helge Scott; Miklos Degré; Aksel Foss; Torbjørn Leivestad; Kåre Osnes; Per Fauchald; Halvor Rollag
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Camille N Kotton
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Face allotransplantation and burns: a review.

Authors:  Anna Arno; J P Barret; Rachael A Harrison; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: how long is enough?

Authors:  Deepali Kumar; Atul Humar
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Cytomegalovirus disease in patients with glomerular diseases treated by immunosuppressive treatment.

Authors:  Zeynep Kendi Celebi; Reyhan Calayoglu; Aysun Karasu Yalcı; Serkan Akturk; Sule Sengul; Sim Kutlay; Gokhan Nergizoglu; Sehsuvar Erturk; Neval Duman; Kenan Ates; Kenan Keven
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Efficacy and safety of a lower-dose valganciclovir (valcyte) regimen for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients.

Authors:  Vrinda Bhat; Megan McIntyre; Tracey Meyers
Journal:  P T       Date:  2010-12

6.  Cytomegalovirus disease in African-American kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  J McGee; V Mave; C L Yau; M Killackey; A Paramesh; J Buell; D P Slakey; L L Hamm; R Zhang
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  A Markov Analysis of Screening for Late-Onset Cytomegalovirus Disease in Cytomegalovirus High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Chethan M Puttarajappa; Sundaram Hariharan; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Patrick B Mark; Rajan K Patel; Kate K Stevens; Nicholas Palmer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Cytomegalovirus in the transplanted kidney: a report of two cases and review of prophylaxis.

Authors:  Shuchi Anand; Julie M Yabu; Marc L Melcher; Neeraja Kambham; Zoltan Laszik; Jane C Tan
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2011-07-18

10.  Role of Secondary Prophylaxis With Valganciclovir in the Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Bradley J Gardiner; Jennifer K Chow; Lori Lyn Price; Natalie E Nierenberg; David M Kent; David R Snydman
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.