Literature DB >> 19761786

Motion-induced position shifts occur after motion integration.

George Mather1, Andrea Pavan.   

Abstract

Low-level motion processing in the primate visual system involves two stages. The first stage (in V1) contains specialised motion sensors which respond to local retinal motion, and the second stage (in MT) pools local signals to encode rigid surface motion. Recent psychophysical research shows that motion signals influence the perceived position of an object (motion-induced position shift, MIPS). In the present paper we investigate the role played by the two processing stages in generating MIPS. We compared MIPS induced by single grating components (Gabor patches) to MIPS induced by plaids created by combining pairs of components. If motion signals at the lowest level of motion analysis (V1) influence position assignment, MIPS from plaids should reflect the position shift induced by each component when presented separately. On the other hand, if signals generated in MT (or later) influence perceived position, then MIPS from plaids should be consistent with a motion integration computation on the components. Results showed that MIPS from plaids is larger than the MIPS obtained from individual components, and can be explained by the output of an integration process that combines intersection-of-constraints and vector-sum computations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19761786     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  The edge of awareness: Mask spatial density, but not color, determines optimal temporal frequency for continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Weina Zhu; David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Visual crowding is unaffected by adaptation-induced spatial compression.

Authors:  Alison Chambers; Alan Johnston; Neil W Roach
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Interactions of flicker and motion.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Sion Gutentag; Christopher D Blair; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Motion streaks do not influence the perceived position of stationary flashed objects.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-03

5.  Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement.

Authors:  Franck Caniard; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Motion-Induced Position Shifts Activate Early Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Kohler; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Motion-induced position shift in early Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Fei Ye; Maobin Ye; Jun An; Dong Wang; Qin Wang; Yanlin Chen; Xiapei Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Wandering Circles: A Flicker Rate and Contour-Dependent Motion Illusion.

Authors:  Christopher D Blair; Gennady Erlikhman; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-09-25

Review 9.  Investigating the Interaction Between Form and Motion Processing: A Review of Basic Research and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Rita Donato; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.