Literature DB >> 19761340

On the nature of the stimulus information necessary for estimating mean size of visual arrays.

Sung Jun Joo1, Kilho Shin, Sang Chul Chong, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

This paper explores the nature of the representations used for computing mean visual size of an array of visual objects of different sizes. In Experiment 1 we found that mean size judgments are accurately made even when the individual objects (circles) upon which those judgments were based were distributed between the two eyes. Mean size judgments were impaired, however, when a subset of the constituent objects involved in the estimation of mean size were rendered invisible by interocular suppression. These findings suggest that mean size is computed from relatively refined stimulus information represented at stages of visual processing beyond those involved in binocular combination and interocular suppression. In Experiment 2 we used an attentional blink paradigm to learn whether this refined information was susceptible to the constraints of attention. Accuracy of mean size judgments was unchanged when one of the two arrays of circles was presented within a rapid serial visual presentation sequence, regardless of task requirement (single vs. dual task) and the array's time of presentation relative to the brief appearance of a target that was the focus of attention. Evidently the refined stimulus information used for computing mean size remains available even in the absence of focused attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19761340      PMCID: PMC2769576          DOI: 10.1167/9.9.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  33 in total

1.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

2.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Requirement for high-level processing in subliminal learning.

Authors:  Aaron Seitz; Christine Lefebvre; Takeo Watanabe; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-01

5.  How the deployment of attention determines what we see.

Authors:  Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006-08-01

6.  Man as an intuitive statistician.

Authors:  Cameron R Peterson; Lee Roy Beach
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Discrimination of speed distributions: sensitivity to statistical properties.

Authors:  P Atchley; G J Andersen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Rapid averaging? Not so fast!

Authors:  Brittany F Whiting; Chris Oriet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

2.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Distributed versus focused attention (count vs estimate).

Authors:  Sang C Chong; Karla K Evans
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-12-23

4.  Statistical extraction affects visually guided action.

Authors:  Jennifer E Corbett; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-07-01

5.  No effect of spatial attention on the processing of a motion ensemble: Evidence from Posner cueing.

Authors:  Louisa A Talipski; Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Eye movements reveal distinct encoding patterns for number and cumulative surface area in random dot arrays.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The virtual loss function in the summary perception of motion and its limited adjustability.

Authors:  Tianyuan Teng; Sheng Li; Hang Zhang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Statistical Properties Demand as Much Attention as Object Features.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Extracting the mean size across the visual field in patients with mild, chronic unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Allison Yamanashi Leib; Ayelet N Landau; Yihwa Baek; Sang C Chong; Lynn Robertson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.