Literature DB >> 19760931

Conventional haemorrhoidectomy, stapled haemorrhoidectomy, Doppler guided haemorrhoidectomy artery ligation; post operative pain and anorectal manometric assessment.

Wael Khafagy1, Ayman El Nakeeb, Elyamany Fouda, Walid Omar, Nabil Gad Elhak, Mohamed Farid, Mohamed Elshobaky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the present article was to compare stapled haemorrhoidectomy, and haemorrhoidal artery ligation with open haemorrhoidectomy with respect to the postoperative pain, symptom control, and manometric alterations.
METHODOLOGY: Forty five patients with third or fourth-degree haemorrhoids were randomly classified into three groups; first group managed by stapled haemorrhoidectomy, second group managed by conventional haemorrhoidectomy and third group managed by Doppler guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation. (15 patients each) Preoperative and 12 weeks postoperative anorectal manometry were done for all patients.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference of the operative time between stapled group and Milligan-Morgan group (p < 0.001) while no significant difference between stapled group and Doppler group. The pain scores were significantly higher in open group (p < 0.001) during the first 24 hours at the time of first motion and one week after operation. Postoperative control of prolapsed symptoms was significantly better with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy than with stapled. The control of other symptoms was similar with regard to bleeding, pain, pruritus, and incontinence scores. Anorectal manometry showed a decrease in the maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure in all groups, but this decrease was only significant in the stapled haemorrhoidectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Stapled and Doppler haemorrhoidectomy is as effective as conventional haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of haemorrhoids, but with the exception of skin tag prolapse. There is a need for long-term follow-up for the changes in manometric parameters after haemorrhoidectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the early results of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization and hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel.

Authors:  Akira Tsunoda; Yoshiyuki Kiyasu; Wataru Fujii; Nobuyasu Kano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Outcome of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III haemorrhoids.

Authors:  P Giordano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Excisional hemorrhoidal surgery and its effect on anal continence.

Authors:  Yan-Dong Li; Jia-He Xu; Jian-Jiang Lin; Wei-Fang Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The single pile classification: a new tool for the classification of haemorrhoidal disease and the comparison of treatment results.

Authors:  C Elbetti; I Giani; E Novelli; C Fucini; Jacopo Martellucci
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-07

5.  Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes.

Authors:  P Giordano; P Nastro; A Davies; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: A PRISMA-compliant updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Authors:  Yan Song; Honglei Chen; Fang Yang; Yuheng Zeng; Yongheng He; Huiyong Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  The HubBLe trial: haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) versus rubber band ligation (RBL) for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  Jim Tiernan; Daniel Hind; Angus Watson; Allan J Wailoo; Michael Bradburn; Neil Shephard; Katie Biggs; Steven Brown
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids.

Authors:  P Giordano; I Tomasi; A Pascariello; E Mills; S Elahi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Application of 'tying, binding and fixing operation' in surgical treatment of severe mixed hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Hong-Xiang Huang; Yi-Bo Yao; Ying Tang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.