Literature DB >> 19760291

Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.

Yaomin Hu1, Wei Liu, Yawen Chen, Ming Zhang, Lihua Wang, Huan Zhou, Peihong Wu, Xiangyu Teng, Ying Dong, Jia wen Zhou, Hua Xu, Jun Zheng, Shengxian Li, Tao Tao, Yumei Hu, Yun Jia.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the validity of combined use of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as screening tests for diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in high-risk subjects. A total of 2,298 subjects were included. All subjects underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and HbA1c measurement. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis was used to examine the sensitivity and specificity of FPG and HbA1c for detecting diabetes and IGT, which was defined according to the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. (1) Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut point of FPG related to diabetes diagnosed by OGTT was 6.1 mmol/l that was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.5 and 81.0%, respectively; The optimal cut point of HbA1c related to diabetes diagnosed by OGTT was 6.1%, which was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.0 and 81.0%, respectively; The screening model using FPG > or = 6.1 mmol/l or HbA1c > or = 6.1% had sensitivity of 96.5% for detecting undiagnosed diabetes; the screening model using FPG > or = 6.1 mmol/l and HbA1c > or = 6.1% had specificity of 96.3% for detecting undiagnosed diabetes. (2) Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut point of FPG related to IGT diagnosed by OGTT was 5.6 mmol/l that was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 64.1 and 65.4%, respectively; The optimal cut point of HbA1c related to IGT diagnosed by OGTT was 5.6%, which was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 66.2 and 51.0%, respectively; The screening model using FPG > or = 5.6 mmol/l or HbA1c > or = 5.6% had sensitivity of 87.9% for detecting undiagnosed IGT; The screening model using FPG > or = 5.6 mmol/l and HbA1c > or = 5.6% had specificity of 82.4% for detecting undiagnosed IGT. Compared with FPG or HbA1c alone, the simultaneous measurement of FPG and HbA1c (FPG and/or HbA1C) might be a more sensitive and specific screening tool for identifying high-risk individuals with diabetes and IGT at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760291     DOI: 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  28 in total

1.  Fasting capillary blood glucose: an appropriate measurement in screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes in low-resource rural settings.

Authors:  X Zhao; W Zhao; H Zhang; J Li; Y Shu; S Li; L Cai; J Zhou; Y Li; R Hu
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Pitfalls of HbA1c in the Diagnosis of Diabetes.

Authors:  Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; João Sérgio Neves; Mariana P Monteiro; Jose Luiz Medina; Brenda Dorcely; Martin Buysschaert
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  The 2014 Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) guidelines for pharmacists: An update.

Authors:  Sherilyn K D Houle; Raj Padwal; Luc Poirier; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-07

4.  Chronic stress, inflammation, and glucose regulation in U.S. Hispanics from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Jessica L McCurley; Paul J Mills; Scott C Roesch; Mercedes Carnethon; Rebeca E Giacinto; Carmen R Isasi; Yanping Teng; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Maria M Llabre; Frank J Penedo; Neil Schneiderman; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Evaluation of hemoglobin A1c criteria to assess preoperative diabetes risk in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Roma Y Gianchandani; Sima Saberi; Christina A Zrull; Preethi V Patil; Leena Jha; Susan C Kling-Colson; Kenia G Gandia; Elizabeth C DuBois; Cynthia D Plunkett; Tim W Bodnar; Rodica Pop-Busui
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  HbA(1c) values for defining diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Asian Indians.

Authors:  Manisha Nair; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; K M Venkat Narayan; Rashmi Sinha; Ramakrishnan Lakshmy; Niveditha Devasenapathy; Carrie R Daniel; Ruby Gupta; Preethi S George; Aleyamma Mathew; Nikhil Tandon; K Srinath Reddy
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Hemoglobin A1c as a screen for previously undiagnosed prediabetes and diabetes in an acute-care setting.

Authors:  Robert A Silverman; Urvi Thakker; Tovah Ellman; Ivan Wong; Kelly Smith; Kazuhiko Ito; Kirsten Graff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Validity of glycated hemoglobin in screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese subjects.

Authors:  Yun Yu; Xiao-Jun Ouyang; Qing-Lin Lou; Liu-Bao Gu; Yong-Zhen Mo; Gary T Ko; Chun-Chung Chow; Wing-Yee So; Ronald Ma; Alice Kong; Nicola Brown; Jennifer Nan; Juliana Chan; Rong-Wen Bian
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  The prevalence of diabetes amongst young Emirati female adults in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maysm N Mohamad; Leila Cheikh Ismail; Lily Stojanovska; Vasso Apostolopoulos; Jack Feehan; Amjad H Jarrar; Ayesha S Al Dhaheri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of age and sex in the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using glycated haemoglobin in Japan: the Yuport Medical Checkup Centre study.

Authors:  Machiko Inoue; Kazuo Inoue; Kimihiko Akimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.