Literature DB >> 19760275

Magnetoreception in birds: no intensity window in "fixed direction" responses.

Wolfgang Wiltschko1, Lars Dehe, Katrin Stapput, Peter Thalau, Roswitha Wiltschko.   

Abstract

Under 502 nm turquoise light combined with 590 nm yellow light and in total darkness, European robins, Erithacus rubecula, no longer prefer their migratory direction, but exhibit so-called fixed direction responses that do not show the seasonal change between spring and autumn. We tested robins under these light conditions in the local geomagnetic field of 46 microT, a field of twice this intensity, 92 microT, and a field of three times this intensity, 138 microT. Under all three magnetic conditions, the birds preferred the same easterly direction under turquoise-and-yellow light and the same northwesterly direction under dark, while they were oriented in their seasonally appropriate direction under control conditions. "Fixed direction" responses are thus not limited to a narrow intensity window as has been found for normal compass orientation. This can be attributed to their origin in the magnetite-based receptor in the upper beak, which operates according to fundamentally different principles than the radical pair mechanism in the retina mediating compass orientation. "Fixed direction" responses are possibly a relict of a receptor mechanism that changed its function, now mainly providing information on magnetic intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760275     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-009-0608-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  33 in total

1.  Ultrastructural analysis of a putative magnetoreceptor in the beak of homing pigeons.

Authors:  Gerta Fleissner; Elke Holtkamp-Rötzler; Marianne Hanzlik; Michael Winklhofer; Günther Fleissner; Nikolai Petersen; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Magnetic pulse affects a putative magnetoreceptor mechanism.

Authors:  Alfonso F Davila; Michael Winklhofer; Valera P Shcherbakov; Nikolai Petersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Bird navigation: what type of information does the magnetite-based receptor provide?

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Ursula Munro; Hugh Ford; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense.

Authors:  M M Walker; C E Diebel; C V Haugh; P M Pankhurst; J C Montgomery; C R Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Directional orientation of birds by the magnetic field under different light conditions.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  The magnetic compass of domestic chickens, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Rafael Freire; Ursula Munro; Thorsten Ritz; Lesley Rogers; Peter Thalau; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  [On the effect of static magnetic fields on the migratory orientation of the robin (Erithacus rubecula)].

Authors:  W Wiltschko
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1968-08

9.  Does the avian ophthalmic nerve carry magnetic navigational information?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: increasing intensity of monochromatic light changes the nature of the response.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Hans-Joachim Bischof; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Directional orientation of birds by the magnetic field under different light conditions.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Insight into shark magnetic field perception from empirical observations.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Tamrynn M Clegg; Luisa V M V Q Véras; Kim N Holland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.