Literature DB >> 19760271

Scoliosis in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy: a changing trend in surgical management : a historical surgical outcome study comparing sublaminar, hybrid and pedicle screw instrumentation systems.

Ranganathan Arun1, S Srinivas, S M H Mehdian.   

Abstract

A non-randomised retrospective study to compare the results of surgical correction of scoliosis in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients using three different instrumentation systems-Sublaminar instrumentation system (Group A), a hybrid of sublaminar and pedicle screw systems (Group B) and pedicle screw system alone (Group C). Between 1993 and 2003, 43 patients with DMD underwent posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation. Group A (n = 19) had sublaminar instrumentation system, Group B (n = 13) had a hybrid construct and Group C (n = 11) was treated with pedicle system. The mean blood loss in Group A was 4.1 l, 3.2 l in Group B and 2.5 l in Group C. Average operating times in Group A, B and C were 300, 274 and 234 min, respectively. Mean pre-operative, post-operative and final Cobb angle in Group A was 50.05 +/- 15.46 degrees , 15.68 +/- 11.23 degrees and 21.57 +/- 11.63 degrees , Group B was 17.76 +/- 8.50 degrees , 3.61 +/- 2.53 degrees and 6.69 +/- 4.19 degrees and Group C was 25.81 +/- 9.94 degrees , 5.45 +/- 3.88 degrees , 8.90 +/- 5.82 degrees , respectively. Flexibility index or the potential correction calculated from bending radiographs were 60 +/- 6.33, 70 +/- 4.65 and 67 +/- 6.79% for Group A, Group B and Group C respectively. The percentage correction achieved was 72.5 +/- 14.5% in Group A, 82 +/- 6% in Group B and 82 +/- 8% in Group C. The difference between percentage correction achieved and the flexibility index was 12.45 +/- 8.22, 12.05 +/- 1.3 and 15.00 +/- 1.21% in Group A, B and C, respectively The percentage loss of correction in Cobb angles at final follow-up in Group A, B and C was 12.5 +/- 3.5, 16.5 +/- 1. and 12.5 +/- 2.5%, respectively. Complications seen in Group A were three cases of wound infection and two cases of implant failure; Group B had a single case of implant failure and Group C had one patient with wound infection and one case with a partial screw pull out. Early surgery and smaller curve corrections appears to be the current trend in the management of scoliosis in DMD. This has been possible due to early curve detection and surgery thus having the advantage of less post-operative respiratory complications and stay in paediatric intensive care. Also, early surgery avoids development of pelvic deformity and extension of instrumentation to the pelvis thereby reducing blood loss. This trend reflects the advent of newer and safer instrumentation systems, advanced techniques in anaesthesia and cord monitoring. Sublaminar instrumentation system group had increased operating times and blood loss compared to both the hybrid and pedicle screw instrumentation systems due to increased bleeding from epidural vessels and pelvic instrumentation. Overall, the three instrumentation constructs appear to provide and maintain an optimal degree of correction at medium to long term follow up but the advantages of lesser blood loss and surgical time without the need for pelvic fixation seem to swing the verdict in favour of the pedicle screw system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760271      PMCID: PMC2899752          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Treatment of scoliosis. Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation.

Authors:  P R HARRINGTON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Spinal stabilisation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  C S Galasko; C Delaney; P Morris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-03

3.  Evolution of treatment of paralytic scoliosis at Rancho Los Amigos Hospital.

Authors:  C Bonnett; J C Brown; J Perry; V L Nickel; T Walinski; L Brooks; M Hoffer; C Stiles; R Brooks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Segmental spinal instrumentation with sublaminar wires. A critical appraisal.

Authors:  W A Herndon; J A Sullivan; D A Yngve; R H Gross; G Dreher
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  [Characteristics in the treatment of scoliosis in muscular diseases].

Authors:  R Forst; J Forst; K D Heller; K Hengstler
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

6.  Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe?

Authors:  S I Suk; W J Kim; S M Lee; J H Kim; E R Chung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Management of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a large 10-year retrospective study.

Authors:  M Kinali; S Messina; E Mercuri; J Lehovsky; G Edge; A Y Manzur; F Muntoni
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.449

8.  The treatment of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Y Rideau; B Glorion; A Delaubier; O Tarlé; J Bach
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  [Multi-segmental fusion of scoliosis in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy].

Authors:  C Hopf; R Forst; J Forst; P Eysel; B Reitter
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

10.  Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy--fixation and fusion to the sacropelvis?

Authors:  S J Mubarak; W D Morin; J Leach
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  11 in total

1.  Incidence and the risk factors of spinal deformity in adult patient after spinal cord injury: a single center cohort study.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Atsushi Hasegawa; Masakazu Takemitsu; Yoshiyuki Yato; Masafumi Machida; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the management of scoliosis.

Authors:  James E Archer; Adrian C Gardner; Helen P Roper; Ashish A Chikermane; Andrew J Tatman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  [Characteristics of neuromuscular scoliosis].

Authors:  M Putzier; C Groß; R K Zahn; M Pumberger; P Strube
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Limitations of posterior spinal fusion to L5 for flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis focusing on pelvic obliquity.

Authors:  Wataru Saito; Gen Inoue; Eiki Shirasawa; Takayuki Imura; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Ayumu Kawakubo; Kentaro Uchida; Toshiaki Kotani; Tsutomu Akazawa; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-02

5.  The effect of posterior spinal fusion on respiratory function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  W M Alexander; M Smith; B J C Freeman; L M Sutherland; J D Kennedy; P J Cundy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients in Germany: the present situation.

Authors:  Jürgen Forst; Raimund Forst
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2012-05

Review 7.  Surgery for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Daniel K L Cheuk; Virginia Wong; Elizabeth Wraige; Peter Baxter; Ashley Cole
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-01

8.  Spinal Deformity Correction in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD): Comparing the Outcome of Two Instrumentation Techniques.

Authors:  Ujjwal Kanti Debnath; Syed M Hossein Mehdian; John K Webb
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-03-02

9.  Posterior spinal fusion to sacrum in non-ambulatory hypotonic neuromuscular patients: sacral rod/bone graft onlay method.

Authors:  Theresa Bui; Frederic Shapiro
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 10.  Corticosteroid Treatment Impact on Spinal Deformity in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Authors:  Ilaria Sanzarello; Luciano Merlini; Francesco Traina; Michele Attilio Rosa; Cesare Faldini
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.