Literature DB >> 19760269

In search of differences between the two types of sensory cells innervating spider slit sensilla (Cupiennius salei Keys.).

Jorge Molina1, Clemens F Schaber, Friedrich G Barth.   

Abstract

The metatarsal lyriform organ of the spider Cupiennius salei is a vibration detector consisting of 21 cuticular slits supplied by two sensory cells each, one ending in the outer and the other at the inner slit membrane. In search of functional differences between the two cell types due to differences in stimulus transmission, we analyzed (1) the adaptation of responses to electrical stimulation, (2) the thresholds for mechanical stimulation and (3) the representation of male courtship vibrations using intracellular recording and staining techniques. Single- and multi-spiking receptor neurons were found among both cell types, which showed high-pass filter characteristics. Below 100-Hz threshold, tarsal deflections were between 1 degrees and 10 degrees. At higher frequencies, they decreased down to values as small as 0.05 degrees, corresponding to 4.5-nm tarsal deflection in the most sensitive cases. Different slits in the organ and receptor cells with slow or fast adaptation did not differ in this regard. When stimulated with male courtship vibrations, both types of receptor cells again did not differ significantly regarding number of action potentials, latency and synchronization coefficients. Surprisingly, the differences in dendrite coupling were not reflected by the physiological responses of the two cell types innervating the slits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760269     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0477-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  Female sex pheromone of a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei): identification and sensory reception.

Authors:  H Tichy; E Gingl; R Ehn; M Papke; S Schulz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  From stress and strain to spikes: mechanotransduction in spider slit sensilla.

Authors:  Andrew S French; Päivi H Torkkeli; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Finite element modeling of arachnid slit sensilla-I. The mechanical significance of different slit arrays.

Authors:  Bernhard Hössl; Helmut J Böhm; Franz G Rammerstorfer; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Ionic selectivity of mechanically activated channels in spider mechanoreceptor neurons.

Authors:  U Höger; P H Torkkeli; E A Seyfarth; A S French
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy.

Authors:  A R Spurr
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1969-01

6.  [Input apparatus of slit sense organs (Cupiennius salei Keys., Araneae)].

Authors:  F G Barth
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1971

7.  Intracellular characterization of identified sensory cells in a new spider mechanoreceptor preparation.

Authors:  E A Seyfarth; A S French
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Proprioceptor distribution and control of a muscle reflex in the tibia of spider legs.

Authors:  E A Seyfarth; H J Pflüger
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1984-09

9.  Acetylcholine and histamine are transmitter candidates in identifiable mechanosensitive neurons of the spider Cupiennius salei: an immunocytochemical study.

Authors:  R Fabian; E A Seyfarth
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.249

10.  Central projections of olfactory receptor neurons from single antennal and palpal sensilla in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Sylvia Anton; Joop J A van Loon; Jocelijn Meijerink; Hans M Smid; Willem Takken; Jean-Pierre Rospars
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  4 in total

1.  Force transformation in spider strain sensors: white light interferometry.

Authors:  Clemens F Schaber; Stanislav N Gorb; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Finite element modeling of arachnid slit sensilla: II. Actual lyriform organs and the face deformations of the individual slits.

Authors:  Bernhard Hössl; Helmut J Böhm; Clemens F Schaber; Franz G Rammerstorfer; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Micro- and nano-structural details of a spider's filter for substrate vibrations: relevance for low-frequency signal transmission.

Authors:  Maxim Erko; Osnat Younes-Metzler; Alexander Rack; Paul Zaslansky; Seth L Young; Garrett Milliron; Marius Chyasnavichyus; Friedrich G Barth; Peter Fratzl; Vladimir Tsukruk; Igor Zlotnikov; Yael Politi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Naturalistic stimulation changes the dynamic response of action potential encoding in a mechanoreceptor.

Authors:  Keram Pfeiffer; Andrew S French
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.