Literature DB >> 19760046

Reduction of postoperative complication rate with the use of early oral feeding in gynecologic oncologic patients undergoing a major surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Lucas Minig1, Roberto Biffi, Vanna Zanagnolo, Anna Attanasio, Carmen Beltrami, Luca Bocciolone, Edoardo Botteri, Nicoletta Colombo, Simona Iodice, Fabio Landoni, Michele Peiretti, Giovanni Roviglione, Angelo Maggioni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial was performed to assess the outcome of early oral postoperative feeding (EOF) compared with traditional oral feeding (TOF) in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing a complex laparotomy, including upper abdominal surgery.
METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years, undergoing an elective laparotomy and with a preoperative suspicion of gynecologic malignancy, were eligible. Exclusion criteria included infectious conditions, intestinal obstruction, severe malnutrition, American Society of Anesthesiologists score C4, intestinal resection, and postoperative stay in the intensive care unit lasting 24 h. Patients allocated to EOF received liquid diet in the first postoperative day and then regular diet. Patients received traditional feeding scheme until resolution of postoperative ileus to start liquid diet. The primary end-point of the trial was length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Between January 1, 2007, and November 17, 2007, a total of 143 patients were randomized to receive either EOF or TOF. Hospital stay for patients who received EOF (n=71) was 4.7 vs. 5.8 days for the TOF group (n=72) (P=0.006). The mean level of postoperative satisfaction was significantly higher in the EOF group (82.8 vs. 71.7 mm, P B 0.001). Patients who received the TOF scheme had significantly higher overall postoperative complications (39 vs. 17% in EOF group, P=0.003) and infective complications (14% in TOF group vs. 3% in EOF group, P=0.017). Variables such as nausea and vomiting, analgesic and antiemetic requirement as well as level of pain and quality of life were not different between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these findings, the policy of EOF should be used after a complex gynecologic oncologic laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760046     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0681-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  14 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Postoperative management and restrictions for female pelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Cedric Olivera; Thomas Wheeler; Elizabeth Casiano; Nazema Siddiqui; Rajiv Gala; Tondalaya Gamble; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Changes in short-term health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic oncologic laparotomy: an associated factor analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; Jorge Iván Vélez; Edward L Trimble; Roberto Biffi; Angelo Maggioni; Diana D Jeffery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Early Oral Feeding Following McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Yin Li; Xian-Ben Liu; Rui-Xiang Zhang; Zong-Fei Wang; Toni Lerut; Chia-Chuan Liu; Alfonso Fiorelli; Yin-Kai Chao; Daniela Molena; Robert J Cerfolio; Soji Ozawa; Andrew C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in ovarian malignancy surgery.

Authors:  Joseph J Noh; Myeong-Seon Kim; Yoo-Young Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery.

Authors:  Kittipat Charoenkwan; Elizabeth Matovinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 7.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Linda Van Le
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 8.  Is early oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery feasible? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaoping Liu; Da Wang; Liansheng Zheng; Tingyu Mou; Hao Liu; Guoxin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II.

Authors:  G Nelson; A D Altman; A Nick; L A Meyer; P T Ramirez; C Achtari; J Antrobus; J Huang; M Scott; L Wijk; N Acheson; O Ljungqvist; S C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Perioperative nutrition interventions for women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Hazel A Billson; Cathrine Holland; Janet Curwell; Valerie L Davey; Laura Kinsey; Lianna J Lawton; Alison J Whitworth; Sorrel Burden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.