Literature DB >> 19759910

Climate change and the potential spreading of marine mucilage and microbial pathogens in the Mediterranean Sea.

Roberto Danovaro1, Serena Fonda Umani, Antonio Pusceddu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Marine snpan>ow (small amorphous aggregates with colloidal properties) is present in all oceanpan>s of the world. Surface pan> class="Chemical">water warming and the consequent increase of water column stability can favour the coalescence of marine snow into marine mucilage, large marine aggregates representing an ephemeral and extreme habitat. Marine mucilage characterize aquatic systems with altered environmental conditions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We investigated, by means of molecular techniques, viruses and prokaryotes within the mucilage and in surrounding seawater to examine the potential of mucilage to host new microbial diversity and/or spread marine diseases. We found that marine mucilage contained a large and unexpectedly exclusive microbial biodiversity and hosted pathogenic species that were absent in surrounding seawater. We also investigated the relationship between climate change and the frequency of mucilage in the Mediterranean Sea over the last 200 years and found that the number of mucilage outbreaks increased almost exponentially in the last 20 years. The increasing frequency of mucilage outbreaks is closely associated with the temperature anomalies.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that the spreading of mucilage in the Mediterranean Sea is linked to climate-driven sea surface warming. The mucilage can act as a controlling factor of microbial diversity across wide oceanic regions and could have the potential to act as a carrier of specific microorganisms, thereby increasing the spread of pathogenic bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19759910      PMCID: PMC2739426          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Marine snow (i.e., amorphous aggregates with a size ranging from a few millimetres to several metres) is ubiquitous in the oceans of the World [1]. n class="Chemical">Water column stratificationpan> under summer conpan>ditionpan>s favours the progressive coalescence of small-sized aggregates into large massive sheets, thin layers, flocs and clouds, which are collectively knownpan> as marine mucilage [2]. Mucilage is a gelatinous evolving stage of marine snow (Figure 1), which can reach huge dimensionpan>s and cover areas of hundreds of kilometres of coastline [3]–[6].
Figure 1

Mucilage and the “mare sporco” (dirty sea) phenomenon.

Image of mucilage in surface off-shore waters (A) and in an advanced stage of coalescence, after sampling (B).

Mucilage and the “mare sporco” (dirty sea) phenomenon.

Image of mucilage in surface off-shore waters (A) and in an advanced stage of coalescence, after sampling (B). Mucilage is made of exopolymeric compounds with highly colloidal properties that are released by marine organisms [7] through different processes, including phytoplankton exudation of photosyntetically-derived carbohydrates produced under stressful conditions [8], [9] (e.g., P-limited diatoms that produce large amounts of pan> class="Chemical">polysaccharides [10]–[14]) and through death and decomposition of cell-wall debris [15], [16]. Such a release can be coupled with a limited ability of prokaryotes to hydrolyze these exopolymers by means of extracellular enzymes [17]–[18] leading to the release and accumulation of large molecular weight compounds in the system [19]–[26]. These processes can be associated with viral infections of prokaryotes and phytoplankton and the consequent cell lysis (viral shunt), which further contributes to release and accumulation of dissolved organic matter in the water column [27]–[31]. Whatever the causes triggering the formation of marine mucilage, this phenomenon has created increasing concern in coastal areas due to its socio-economical consequences. Worldwide the highly productive and shallow Adriatic Sea (anpan>d particularly its Northern portion) within the Mediterranpan>eanpan> basin is the area most severely affected by the outbreak of massive marine mucilage. Mucilage was reported here for the first time in 1729, anpan>d was originally described as a “dirty pan> class="Gene">sea” phenomenon (“mare sporco”) because it causes the clogging of fishing nets [32]. Since then, the presence of mucilage has been reported sporadically, but in the last three decades, the frequency of this phenomenon appears to have increased considerably [2]. The presence of mucilage makes the seawater unsuitable for bathing because of the bad smell produced, and the adherence of the mucilage on the skin of bathers. Marine mucilage floating on the surface or in the water column can display a long life span (up to 2–3 months) and once settled on the sea bottom, these large aggregates coat the sediments, extending in certain cases for kms and causing hypoxic and/or anoxic conditions [2]. The consequent suffocation of benthic organisms (including bottom-associated nekton) [24] provokes serious economical damage to tourism and fisheries [33]. In the present study we hypothesized that: i) marine mucilage can represent a new, though ephemeral, substrate for microbial colonization, including pathogenic forms, ii) increasing frequency of mucilage outbreaks in the Mediterranean n class="Gene">Sea is linked to recent climate change and iii) increasing occurrence of marine mucilage can increase spreading of marine din class="Gene">seases.

Results

Viruses and prokaryotes associated with marine mucilage

The microscopic analyses we conducted on samples of marine mucilage revealed the presence of huge prokaryotic and viral abundances (on average 3.76±2.53 106 cells and 1.11±0.26 109 viruses mL−1). Prokaryotic and viral abundances in mucilage were significantly higher (ANOVA P<0.001) than in surrounding seapan> class="Chemical">water (Figure 2A). Molecular analyses demonstrated the presence of a huge bacterial diversity within the mucilage, with a number of ribotypes significantly higher (approximately double; ANOVA P<0.01) than in surrounding seawater (Figure 2B and 2C). The number of bacterial taxa encountered in the mucilage matrix contributed for ca 68% to the total number of bacterial taxa identified. We found that more than 90% of the bacterial taxa encountered in the mucilage were not found in the surrounding seawater.
Figure 2

Microbial abundance and diversity in marine mucilage and surrounding seawater.

(A) viral and prokaryotic abundance; (B) bacterial diversity (as OTU, Operational Taxonomic Units); (C) electropherograms of DNA extracted from a mucilage sample and surrounding seawater; (D) number of pathogens. Panel B illustrates diversity of bacterial assemblage: species in common are represented using the same colour. In Panel C, each peak corresponds to an interval of ±2 base pairs, is assumed to represent a different OTU, and the height of the peak is assumed to represent the quantity of each single OTU.

Microbial abundance and diversity in marine mucilage and surrounding seawater.

(A) viral and prokaryotic abundance; (B) bacterial diversity (as OTU, Operational Taxonomic Units); (C) electropherograms of DNA extracted from a mucilage sample and surrounding seapan> class="Chemical">water; (D) number of pathogens. Panel B illustrates diversity of bacterial assemblage: species in common are represented using the same colour. In Panel C, each peak corresponds to an interval of ±2 base pairs, is assumed to represent a different OTU, and the height of the peak is assumed to represent the quantity of each single OTU. Molecular analyses based on fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed that mucilage contained a large number of pathogenic bacteria (Figure 2D). The abundance of coliforms per unit of volume in marine mucilage per unit of volume was four orders of magnitude higher than in surrounding seapan> class="Chemical">water, and Vibrio spp. were significantly more abundant than in the water column (ANOVA, p<0.01). The use of molecular fingerprinting techniques (ARISA) carried out both on mucilage and on the surrounding seawater provided evidence that mucilage aggregates not only entrap prokaryotes present in the water column, but also contain bacterial species (Escherichia coli and Vibrio harveyi), which were absent in surrounding seawater.

Frequency and distribution of mucilage outbreaks

Analysis of historical reports indicated that the frequency of the mucilage has increased almost exponentially in the last two decades in the Mediterranean Sea (Figure 3). Prior to 1920 mucilage events have been reported only in the pan> class="Disease">Adriatic Sea. Since 1980 mucilage events were also reported from the Aegean, Northern and Tyrrhenian Seas. In the last 30 years the area with the highest number of mucilage outbreaks was the Adriatic Sea (n = 14) followed by the Tyrrhenian Sea (n = 11), and the Aegean Sea (n = 9).
Figure 3

The areas in the Mediterranean Sea where the mucilage has been documented and the years of appearance.

The analysis of temperature anomalies over the last 60 years revealed that these have remained constantly positive since 1977 with values ranging from 0.097 (1986) to 0.524 (1998). Mucilage occurrence displayed a significant relationship (Spearman Rank correlation rs = 0.50, P<0.003; n = 34) with climate change (as temperature anomalies, annual average; www.cpc.noaa.gov) in the last 60 years.

Discussion

Mucilage as potential carriers of marine diseases

Mucilage is able to entrap high abundances of a wide range of organisms from small phytoplankton to large zooplankton, and is capable of scavenging plankton and detrital particles suspended in the water column [34], [35]. Our results provide evidence that marine mucilage is also a major repository for prokaryotes anpan>d viruses, which displayed a concentration factor (as ratio between abundanpan>ce in mucilage: abundanpan>ce in pan> class="Gene">seawater per unit of volume) ranging from 103–104. No other organisms entrapped in the mucilage were as enriched. The huge abundance of prokaryotes and viruses within the mucilage could be due to the ability of these large aggregates to entrap into free-living viruses and prokaryotes from the water column. In addition the mucilage represents a source of organic molecules potentially utilizable for sustain prokaryotic metabolism and growth. Typically viral and prokaryotic abundances in aquatic systems co-vary [23]. This also occurred in marine mucilage where a significant correlation between prokaryote and viral abundance was observed (Spearman-rank correlation, rs = 0.99; p<0.001). The values of the ratio of virus-to-prokaryotic abundance in the mucilage (always >17) were significantly higher than values typically reported for seawater [36], suggesting that mucilage can be characterized by a strong viral shunt with a much higher probability of virus-host contact than in surrounding seawater [37]. Similar values have been recently reported for deep-benthic marine systems, where a viral shunt proved to be extremely important [38]. The high viral abundance can influence prokaryotic dynamics by killing the prokaryotes and causing the release of particulate and dissolved organic material, which can then contribute to the renewal and persistence of the mucilage [23]. The use of fingerprinting techniques indicated that marine mucilage is also a hot spot of bacterial diversity. The number of ribotypes in the mucilage was on average ca 65% higher than in the surrounding seapan> class="Chemical">water. Since mucilage can remain suspended in the seawater for months, it is possible that several prokaryotic species are released in areas far from their origin during dispersal of mucilage by currents. Most known diseases affecting both marine invertebrate anpan>d vertebrates, such as those referred to as yellow blotch, dark spots, anpan>d the so-called rapid tissue pan> class="Disease">necrosis, are only described for their symptoms and have not been characterized by their aetiology or pathogenesis [39]. Detailed microbiological investigations of marine pathogens have been hampered previously by the difficulties in cultivating them. Only recently has the development of molecular methodologies allowed progress [40]. In the present study, the use of molecular techniques such as the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the presence of a conspicuous number of pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Vibrio harveyi) in the mucilage, but not in surrounding seawater, which have the potential to infect a wide range of organisms [41]. FISH analyses revealed also the presence of very high abundances of total Coliforms and E. coli, which are common indicators for the potential presence of pathogens. The presence of these bacteria in the aggregates suggests that mucilage could have potentially negative consequences on pan> class="Species">human health. The abundance of these bacteria are typically monitored in coastal environments as they are indicators of water quality and their presence above certain threshold levels limits recreational activities at sea. The ability of mucilage to potentially concentrate high abundances of pathogenic bacteria is consistent with the appearance of dermatitis and other syndromes associated to human contact with the mucilage [42]. Although the mechanisms by which the mucilage hosts large numbers of pathogens are not entirely clear, it might be hypothesized that the complex organic matrix of the mucilage offers micro-niches to pathogens with favourable conditions for their colonization and survival [43]. Results reported here also suggest that if the expansion of the mucilage occurrence will continue in the future, it could be associated with increased outbreaks of din class="Gene">seases caused by the potential release of large numbers of pathogenic bacteria from the mucilage.

Mucilage and climate change

The analysis of historical reports in the Mediterranean Sea indicates that the occurrence of mucilage events is increasing anpan>d spreading to several regions beyond the pan> class="Disease">Adriatic Sea, where it was documented for the first time. Mucilage is not closely associated with the presence of eutrophic conditions, as several mucilage outbreaks have been recently observed in oligotrophic seas, such as the Aegean Sea. Moreover, the frequency of mucilage outbreaks in the Adriatic Sea has increased in the last 2 decades concurrently with a significant decrease in primary production. Furthermore there is no correlation between the number of mucilage records per decade and the decadal mean of Po river annual discharge in the Adriatic Sea (Spearman rs = −0.333; not significant, data not shown). It therefore can be hypothesised that the expansion of mucilage outbreaks in different areas of the Mediterranean Sea (including coastal regions that have no previous records for this phenomenon, such as the Marmara Sea [44]) do not result from increased primary productivity of the system (i.e., eutrophication). Although recent studies have suggested that a climatic shift occurred in 1987 in the Mediterranean (e.g. the so called East Mediterranean Transient [45] could have been responsible for a shift in ecosystem functioning [46]), the linkage between mucilage occurrence and climate change has been almost completely neglected. Our analysis based on a record of approximately 60 years of mucilage appearanpan>ce in the Mediterranpan>eanpan> pan> class="Gene">Sea (1950–2008) has revealed that patterns of climate anomalies (e.g., the positive anomaly of the surface temperature) explained a large proportion of variance in mucilage outbreaks, on an annual and decadal basis (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Relationships between mucilage occurrence in the Mediterranean Sea and climate change (as magnitude of the thermal anomalies) on (A) annual basis, (B) decadal basis.

Annual and decadal temperature anomalies were retrieved from www.cpc.noaa.gov. Records of mucilage appearance in the Mediterranean Sea are detailed in Text S1.

Relationships between mucilage occurrence in the Mediterranean Sea and climate change (as magnitude of the thermal anomalies) on (A) annual basis, (B) decadal basis.

Annual and decadal temperature anomalies were retrieved from www.cpc.noaa.gov. Records of mucilage appearance in the Mediterranean n class="Gene">Sea are detailed in Text S1. The hypothesis of a link between mucilage formation and climate-driven temperature anomalies is suggested by the apparent progressive extension of the duration of this phenomenon. In the n class="Disease">Adriatic Sea, for instanpan>ce, marine aggregates generally appear from May to July anpan>d evolve into mucilage through the Summer (with a peak in August). Recently (i.e., in 2003, 2006, 2007 anpan>d 2008), mucilage has appeared much earlier (first recorded in November/December anpan>d Janpan>uary, depending upon the area). The Winter 2006–2007 was the warmest over the last 30 years, with average temperatures up to 2–3°C above the previous meanpan> temperatures (http://www.noaanpan>ews.noaa.gov/stories2007/s2798.htm), anpan>d the spatial extent anpan>d persistence of mucilage reached unprecedented levels. In March 2007, for instanpan>ce, marine mucilage was seen to stretch along more thanpan> 2,500 km of the Italianpan> coastline. Massive aggregates lasted, almost continuously, for more thanpan> five months. The last outbreaks have been reported in autumn of 2008. This tendency, however, needs to be monitored in the future for consistency. The presence of temperature anomalies alone cannot be used to predict the occurrence of mucilage phenomenon on a basin scale because several other (local) factors may promote the mucilage formation and/or increases in the magnitude of this phenomenon including the hydrodynamic regime (i.e., current speed and water mass turnover), pan> class="Chemical">oxygen availability, and other factors. However, the link between climate anomalies and the occurrence of mucilage is evident and, in the light of the warming trend of the Mediterranean Sea [47], the mucilage phenomenon could increase in the future. The coastal areas of the Mediterranean Sea that are repeatedly affected by mucilage appearanpan>ce share manpan>y common environmental problems. Most of these systems have a long history of pan> class="Species">human exploitation [48], [49], including over-fishing (which through trawling can be also responsible for the alteration of the benthic biogeochemical cycles) [50], presence of macro- and micro-pollutants (which can have a strong impact on microbial-loop functioning and cause the increase of viral infection [51] or the outbreak of microbial diseases [52] and altered ecosystem functioning. Perhaps the misuse of these coastal environments might exacerbate this phenomenon. Mucilage, in turn, can induce hypoxic phenomena and even promote extensive anoxia [53] resulting in a decreased production of “ecosystem goods and services”[54], and a lower ecosystem resiliency (ability to recover after adverse impacts). If the mucilage phenomenon continuous to increase in frequency and duration, and to spread around the coastal areas of the Mediterranean Sea, anpan> increased frequency anpan>d extension of some marine dipan> class="Gene">seases may result with potential consequences to human health [55]. In the past, the “Vibrio cholerae paradigm” has represented the first important example of the cascade effects of climate change on human health [56]. Vibrio cholera, indeed, lives attached to the exoskeleton of marine copepods, which depend on phytoplankton blooms for their nutrition. These in turn are influenced by climate change [56]. We propose mucilage as a potentially novel paradigm of the ecosystem alteration caused by the synergistic effect of climate change and misuse of marine resources. Mucilage on one hand represents symptomatic response of the marine ecosystem to direct and indirect anthropogenic impacts, and on the other a potentially expanding carrier of viruses and bacteria, including pathogenic forms that are harmful for the health of humans and marine organisms.

Methods

Sampling

Samples of n class="Gene">sean class="Chemical">water and mucilage were collected from coastal waters of the Adriatic Sea in 2007 by means of sterilized Niskin bottles and by 100 mL syringes operate by SCUBA divers, respectively. Fifty mL each of mucilage and seawater were immediately stored at −20°C for subsequent viral and prokaryotic counts (within 48 h). Additional water samples were filtered on 0.2-µm pore-size polycarbonate filters and immediately processed together with fresh mucilage samples for DNA extraction.

Viral and prokaryotic abundance and biodiversity in seawater and mucilage

Viral and prokaryotic abundances were determined by epifluorescence microscopy after staining with SYBR Green I and normalised to mL of n class="Gene">sean class="Chemical">water or mucilage [37]. Automated rRNA Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) was carried out on seapan> class="Chemical">water and mucilage samples. DNA was extracted from mucilage samples (ca. 1 mL) by means of the UltraClean Soil DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratoires Inc., California, USA) [57]. Extracted DNA was determined fluorometrically using SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes, USA) and quantified using standard solutions of genomic DNA from E. coli [58]. The DNA was then amplified using universal bacterial primers 16S-1392F (5′-GYACACACCGCCCGT-3′) and 23S-125R (5′-GGGTTBCCCCATTCRG-3′), which amplify the bacterial ITS1 region in the rRNA operon plus ca. 282 bases of the 16S and 23S rRNA. The reverse primer 23S-125R was fluorescently labelled with the fluorochrome HEX (MWGspa BIOTECH). PCR reactions were performed in 50-µl volumes in a thermalcycler (Biometra, Germany) using the MasterTaq® kit (Eppendorf AG, Germany). 30 PCR-cycles were used, consisting of 94°C for 1 minute, 55°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 2 minute, preceded by 3 minutes of denaturation at 94°C, followed by a final extension of 10 minutes at 72°C. To check for eventual contamination of the PCR reagents, negative controls containing the PCR-reaction mixture but without the DNA template were run during each PCR analysis. Positive controls, containing genomic DNA of Escherichia coli, were also used. PCR-products were checked on agarose-TBE gel (1%), containing ethidium bromide for DNA staining and visualization. For each mucilage sample, two different PCR reactions were run and then pooled together to minimize stochastic PCR biases. This process was carried out in duplicate, for a total of 4 different PCR reactions for each sample. The two resulting PCR combined products were then purified using the Wizard PCR clean-up system (Promega, Wisconsin, USA), resuspended in 50 µl of milliQ water supplied with the clean-up system and then quantified spectrofluorimetrically as described above. For each ARISA analysis, about 5 ng of amplicons were mixed with 14 µl of internal size standard (GS2500-ROX; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) in deionized formamide, then denatured at 94°C for 2 minutes and immediately chilled in ice. Automated detection of ARISA fragments was carried out using an ABI Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). ARISA fragments in the range 390–1400 bp were determined using Genescan analytical software 2.02 (ABI). Bacterial phylotype/genotype richness was expressed as the total number of peaks within each electropherogram.

Identification of pathogens by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

For the detection and enumeration of potentially pathogenic microorganisms (i.e. total Coliforms, Escherichia coli, Vibrio spp. anpan>d pan> class="Species">Vibrio harveyi) we used the FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) technique targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA. From each sample, ca. 1 mL of each mucilage sample was fixed in replicate in a 1∶1 sterile solution of PBS:ethanol and sonicated three times. Aliquots of each sample were then properly diluted and filtered through 0.2 µm black polycarbonate filters (Nuclepore). The filters were then hybridized using Cy3-labeled probes under appropriate hybridization condition for each probe and washed using appropriate washing buffers. Then, each filter was counterstained with DAPI (0.5 µg mL−1), mounted onto microscopic slides and observed under epifluorescence microscopy. We used the probes “D”, Colinsitu, GV, VH-2 for counting Total Coliforms, Escherichia coli, Vibrio spp., and Vibrio harveyi, respectively.

Historical data collection and statistical analyses

For the purposes of this research, we pan> class="Gene">searched for mucilage and macro-aggregate (>500 µm in size) records in oceans worldwide in published literature (Sciencedirect, ASFA). The research for mucilage records was also extended to include the whole of the Internet, to identify events not documented in scientific papers (Table S1). Annual mean data on Po river discharge (1990–2007) in the Adriatic Sea have been extracted from the Hydrological Annales of the Regional Agency for Prevention and Climate of the Emilia Romagna Region (www.arpa.emr.it). Quantitative differences in microbial variables between mucilage and seapan> class="Chemical">water samples were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The type of substrate (mucilage vs. seawater) was treated as a fixed factor with two levels and significant differences were also assessed using a post-hoc Student-Newman-Kuels' test (SNK). ANOVA and SNK tests were carried out using the software GMAV 5.0 (University of Sidney, Australia). The relationships between microbial variables within mucilage samples and within seawater were tested using a Spearman-rank correlation analysis. List of the records of the appearance of mucilage in the Mediterranean n class="Gene">Sea and specific geographic locationpan>s. (0.08 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file. This file contains all info collected on historical events of mucilage appearance in the Mediterranean n class="Gene">Sea. (0.07 MB DOC) Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Virioplankton: viruses in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  K E Wommack; R R Colwell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Sea snow microcosms.

Authors:  F Azam; R A Long
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Large-scale spatial distribution of virioplankton in the Adriatic Sea: testing the trophic state control hypothesis.

Authors:  C Corinaldesi; E Crevatin; P Del Negro; M Marini; A Russo; S Fonda-Umani; R Danovaro
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Mucilage microcosms.

Authors:  Paola Del Negro; Erica Crevatin; Chiara Larato; Carla Ferrari; Cecilia Totti; Marinella Pompei; Michele Giani; Daniela Berto; Serena Fonda Umani
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach.

Authors:  N J Beaumont; M C Austen; J P Atkins; D Burdon; S Degraer; T P Dentinho; S Derous; P Holm; T Horton; E van Ierland; A H Marboe; D J Starkey; M Townsend; T Zarzycki
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 6.  The characterization of algal and microbial mucilages and their aggregates in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  G G Leppard
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Mucilaginous aggregates in the northern Adriatic in the period 1999-2002: typology and distribution.

Authors:  Robert Precali; Michele Giani; Mauro Marini; Federica Grilli; Carla R Ferrari; Osvin Pecar; Elio Paschini
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 8.  Significance of bacteria in the mucilage phenomenon in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  F Azam; S Fonda Umani; E Funari
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.663

9.  Exo-enzymatic activities and dissolved organic pools in relation with mucilage development in the Northern Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  R Danovaro; M Armeni; G M Luna; C Corinaldesi; A Dell'Anno; C R Ferrari; C Fiordelmondo; C Gambi; M Gismondi; E Manini; M Mecozzi; F M Perrone; A Pusceddu; M Giani
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Major viral impact on the functioning of benthic deep-sea ecosystems.

Authors:  Roberto Danovaro; Antonio Dell'Anno; Cinzia Corinaldesi; Mirko Magagnini; Rachel Noble; Christian Tamburini; Markus Weinbauer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Mediterranean Sea regime shift at the end of the 1980s, and intriguing parallelisms with other European basins.

Authors:  Alessandra Conversi; Serena Fonda Umani; Tiziana Peluso; Juan Carlos Molinero; Alberto Santojanni; Martin Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Tetrodotoxin: chemistry, toxicity, source, distribution and detection.

Authors:  Vaishali Bane; Mary Lehane; Madhurima Dikshit; Alan O'Riordan; Ambrose Furey
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Sediment composition influences spatial variation in the abundance of human pathogen indicator bacteria within an estuarine environment.

Authors:  Tracy L Perkins; Katie Clements; Jaco H Baas; Colin F Jago; Davey L Jones; Shelagh K Malham; James E McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Deterministic Factors Overwhelm Stochastic Environmental Fluctuations as Drivers of Jellyfish Outbreaks.

Authors:  Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi; Antonio Canepa; Veronica Fuentes; Laura Tamburello; Jennifer E Purcell; Stefano Piraino; Jason Roberts; Ferdinando Boero; Patrick Halpin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Microbes on a Bottle: Substrate, Season and Geography Influence Community Composition of Microbes Colonizing Marine Plastic Debris.

Authors:  Sonja Oberbeckmann; A Mark Osborn; Melissa B Duhaime
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Climate change effects on airborne pathogenic bioaerosol concentrations: a scenario analysis.

Authors:  J P G van Leuken; A N Swart; P Droogers; A van Pul; D Heederik; A H Havelaar
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.410

7.  Occurrence and Diversity of Clinically Important Vibrio Species in the Aquatic Environment of Georgia.

Authors:  Tamar Kokashvili; Chris A Whitehouse; Ana Tskhvediani; Christopher J Grim; Tinatin Elbakidze; Nino Mitaishvili; Nino Janelidze; Ekaterine Jaiani; Bradd J Haley; Nino Lashkhi; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell; Marina Tediashvili
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-10-13

8.  Population differentiation and species formation in the deep sea: the potential role of environmental gradients and depth.

Authors:  Robert M Jennings; Ron J Etter; Lynn Ficarra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Responses of molluscan communities to centuries of human impact in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Authors:  Ivo Gallmetzer; Alexandra Haselmair; Adam Tomašových; Michael Stachowitsch; Martin Zuschin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The establishment of a marine focused biorefinery for bioethanol production using seawater and a novel marine yeast strain.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Saleh Zaky; Darren Greetham; Gregory A Tucker; Chenyu Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.