Literature DB >> 19758878

A randomized comparison of a durable polymer Everolimus-eluting stent with a bare metal coronary stent: The SPIRIT first trial.

Patrick W Serruys1, Andrew T L Ong, Jan J Piek, Franz-Josef Neumann, Willem J van der Giessen, Marcus Wiemer, Andreas Zeiher, Eberhard Grube, Jürgen Haase, Leif Thuesen, Christian Hamm, Patricia C Otto-Terlouw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is a sirolimus analogue with similar efficacy in animal models, and has been previously successfully tested in humans using an erodable polymer.
METHODS: This first-in-man single blind multi-centre randomized controlled trial assessed the safety and efficacy of everolimus eluting from a durable polymer on a cobalt chromium stent in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Sixty patients were allocated to stent implantation with an everolimus-eluting stent (n=28) or an identical bare stent (n=32). Patients had either stable, unstable angina or silent ischaemia. Suitable lesions treated were single de novo native coronary lesions with 50-99% stenosis and could be covered by a 18 mm stent. The primary endpoint was in-stent late loss at 180 days, analysed on a per treatment basis. The major secondary endpoint was percent in-stent volume obstruction (%VO) as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) at 180 days. The clinical secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 180 days.
RESULTS: At 6 months, (matched pairs angiographic analysis), the in-stent late loss, percentage diameter stenosis and percentage of patients with binary restenosis were 0.10 mm, 16% and 0% respectively, in the everolimus arm (n=23), as compared with 0.87 mm, 39% and 25.9%, respectively in the bare stent arm (n=27, p<0.001 for late loss and diameter stenosis, p = 0.01 for restenosis). Significantly less neointimal hyperplasia was observed in the everolimus group compared to the bare stent group (10 +/- 13 mm3 vs 38 +/- 19 mm3, p<0.001) and similarly, less volume obstruction (8.0 +/- 10.4% versus 28.1 +/- 14.0%, p<0.001). A major adverse cardiac event occurred in 2 patients in the everolimus arm versus 6 in the bare stent arm.
CONCLUSION: Everolimus eluted from a durable polymer on a cobalt chromium stent effectively suppresses neointimal growth at 6 months compared to an identical bare stent.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 19758878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  46 in total

1.  Performance figures of invasive cardiology in Germany 2006 and 2007 focussing on coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Dieter Horstkotte; Marcus Wiemer; Frank van Buuren
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Health economic evaluation of the use of drug-eluting stents : First results from the Drug-Eluting Stent Registry (DES.de).

Authors:  S N Willich; F Müller-Riemenschneider; D McBride; S Silber; K-H Kuck; C A Nienaber; S Schneider; J Senges; B Brüggenjürgen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Optimal interventional strategy for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Ji'e Yang; Wahafu Mamuti; Feng Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Drug-eluting stents: current issues.

Authors:  Andrew T L Ong; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

5.  In vitro study of dual drug-eluting stents with locally focused sirolimus and atorvastatin release.

Authors:  Svea Petersen; Janine Hussner; Thomas Reske; Niels Grabow; Volkmar Senz; Robert Begunk; Daniela Arbeiter; Heyo K Kroemer; Klaus-Peter Schmitz; Henriette E Meyer zu Schwabedissen; Katrin Sternberg
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  One-year clinical outcomes of BioMatrix™-Biolimus A9™ eluting stent: the e-BioMatrix multicenter post marketing surveillance registry in India.

Authors:  Ashwin B Mehta; Praveen Chandra; Jamshed Dalal; Prabhakar Shetty; Devang Desai; K Chocklingam; Jayesh Prajapati; Pramod Kumar; Vilas Magarkar; Apurva Vasawada; B K Goyal; Viveka Kumar; V Suryaprakash Rao; Ramesh Babu; Pritesh Parikh; Upendra Kaul; Aruna Patil; Tushar Mhetre; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-09-23

Review 7.  [Second-generation DES : New, but also cost-effective?].

Authors:  F Müller-Riemenschneider; T Reinhold; S N Willich
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Radiation and ethylene oxide terminal sterilization experiences with drug eluting stent products.

Authors:  Byron J Lambert; Todd A Mendelson; Michael D Craven
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Comparison of neointimal hyperplasia and peri-stent vascular remodeling after implantation of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents: intravascular ultrasound results from the EXCELLENT study.

Authors:  Young-Guk Ko; Dong-Ho Shin; Jung-Sun Kim; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Donghoon Choi; Myeong-Ki Hong; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Taehoon Ahn; In-Ho Chae; Jung-Han Yoon; Hyo-Soo Kim; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 10.  Update on the everolimus-eluting coronary stent system: results and implications from the SPIRIT clinical trial program.

Authors:  R Michael Kirchner; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.