Literature DB >> 19757889

Aging alters surround modulation of perceived contrast.

Renee Karas1, Allison M McKendrick.   

Abstract

It is well established that many visual functions deteriorate with age. Perhaps counter-intuitively, a recent study revealed that older people actually require less time to discriminate the direction of motion of large, high contrast moving stimuli than young adults (L. R. Betts, C. P. Taylor, A. B. Sekuler, & P. J. Bennett, 2005). L. R. Betts et al. (2005) proposed their finding as evidence for a reduction of cortical inhibitory function within the aging visual system. There is some neurophysiological support for this suggestion, as broadening of visual cortical neural tuning consistent with reduced inhibitory function has been observed in older animals. Here we explore the perceptual consequences of center-surround suppression within the healthy aging human visual system and report data from a center-surround contrast discrimination task (the Chubb contrast illusion). We predicted that older observers would demonstrate less center-surround suppression than younger subjects (consistent with reduced inhibition). Our data does not support this prediction as perceived contrast was altered more by surround modulation in the older than younger group (t(33) = 2.53, p = 0.02). A possible explanation for our findings is a decrease in perceptual brightness induction in the elderly group. Brightness induction relies on neural synchronization which might be disrupted by aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757889     DOI: 10.1167/9.5.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

Review 1.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Age-related changes in contrast gain related to the M and P pathways.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Distinct visual motion processing impairments in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Voyko Kavcic; William Vaughn; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Orientation-specific surround suppression in the primary visual cortex varies as a function of autistic tendency.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Altered motion repulsion in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Yan Li; Shougang Guo; Yongxiang Wang; Huan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effect of aging on crowded letter recognition in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Andrew T Astle; Alan J Blighe; Ben S Webb; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Cortical correlates in upright dynamic and static balance in the elderly.

Authors:  Maria Rubega; Emanuela Formaggio; Roberto Di Marco; Margherita Bertuccelli; Stefano Tortora; Emanuele Menegatti; Manuela Cattelan; Paolo Bonato; Stefano Masiero; Alessandra Del Felice
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Visual Contextual Effects of Orientation, Contrast, Flicker, and Luminance: All Are Affected by Normal Aging.

Authors:  Bao N Nguyen; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.