Literature DB >> 19757500

Evolutionary analysis of herbivorous insects in natural and agricultural environments.

Aaron J Gassmann1, David W Onstad, Barry R Pittendrigh.   

Abstract

Herbivorous insects offer a remarkable example of the biological diversity that formed the foundation for Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. The ability of insects to evolve resistance rapidly to insecticides and host-plant resistance present a continual challenge for pest management. This paper considers the manner in which genetic constraints, host-plant availability and trade-offs affect the evolution of herbivorous insects in natural and agricultural environments, and the extent to which lessons learned from studying natural systems may be applied to improve insect resistance management in agricultural systems. Studies on the genetic architecture of adaptation by herbivores to host plants and to insecticides are reviewed. The genetic basis of resistance is an important component of simulation models that predict the evolution of resistance. These models often assume monogenic resistance, but available data suggest that this assumption may be overly narrow and that modeling of resistance as oligogenic or polygenic may be more appropriate. As omics (e.g. genomics and proteomics) technologies become more accessible, a better understanding of the genetic basis of resistance will be possible. Trade-offs often accompany adaptations by herbivores. Trade-offs arise when the benefit of a trait, such as the ability to feed on a novel host plant or to survive in the presence of an insecticide, is counterbalanced by fitness costs that decrease fitness in the absence of the selective agent. For resistance to insecticides, and resistance to insecticidal transgenic crops in particular, fitness costs may act as an evolutionary constraint and delay or prevent the evolution of resistance. An important observation is that certain ecological factors such as host plants and entomopathogens can magnify fitness costs, which is termed ecological negative cross-resistance. The application of omics technologies may allow for more efficient identification of factors that will impose ecological negative cross-resistance, thereby bolstering insect resistance management. (c) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757500     DOI: 10.1002/ps.1844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  11 in total

1.  Novel AChE inhibitors for sustainable insecticide resistance management.

Authors:  Haoues Alout; Pierrick Labbé; Arnaud Berthomieu; Luc Djogbénou; Jean-Paul Leonetti; Philippe Fort; Mylène Weill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cotton plants expressing CYP6AE14 double-stranded RNA show enhanced resistance to bollworms.

Authors:  Ying-Bo Mao; Xiao-Yuan Tao; Xue-Yi Xue; Ling-Jian Wang; Xiao-Ya Chen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  CYP6 P450 enzymes and ACE-1 duplication produce extreme and multiple insecticide resistance in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Constant V Edi; Luc Djogbénou; Adam M Jenkins; Kimberly Regna; Marc A T Muskavitch; Rodolphe Poupardin; Christopher M Jones; John Essandoh; Guillaume K Kétoh; Mark J I Paine; Benjamin G Koudou; Martin J Donnelly; Hilary Ranson; David Weetman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Type of fitness cost influences the rate of evolution of resistance to transgenic Bt crops.

Authors:  Sean C Hackett; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 6.528

5.  Population genomics and phylogeography of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in the United States, northern Mexico, and Argentina.

Authors:  Tyler J Raszick; C Michael Dickens; Lindsey C Perkin; Ashley E Tessnow; Charles P-C Suh; Raul Ruiz-Arce; Theodore N Boratynski; Marcelo R Falco; J Spencer Johnston; Gregory A Sword
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Antagonistic relationships between intron content and codon usage bias of genes in three mosquito species: functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Susanta K Behura; Brajendra K Singh; David W Severson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  The entomopathogenic fungal endophytes Purpureocillium lilacinum (formerly Paecilomyces lilacinus) and Beauveria bassiana negatively affect cotton aphid reproduction under both greenhouse and field conditions.

Authors:  Diana Castillo Lopez; Keyan Zhu-Salzman; Maria Julissa Ek-Ramos; Gregory A Sword
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Splice form variant and amino acid changes in MDR49 confers DDT resistance in transgenic Drosophila.

Authors:  Keon Mook Seong; Weilin Sun; John M Clark; Barry R Pittendrigh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Behavioral Avoidance - Will Physiological Insecticide Resistance Level of Insect Strains Affect Their Oviposition and Movement Responses?

Authors:  Christian Nansen; Olivier Baissac; Maria Nansen; Kevin Powis; Greg Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Insights into the neutral and adaptive processes shaping the spatial distribution of genomic variation in the economically important Moroccan locust (Dociostaurus maroccanus).

Authors:  María José González-Serna; Pedro J Cordero; Joaquín Ortego
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.