Literature DB >> 19757446

Developments in asbestos cancer risk assessment.

Michael A Silverstein1, Laura S Welch, Richard Lemen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts have been made for 25 years to develop asbestos risk assessments that provide valid information about workplace and community cancer risks. Mathematical models have been applied to a group of workplace epidemiology studies to describe the relationships between exposure and risk. EPA's most recent proposed method was presented at a public meeting in July 2008.
METHODS: Risk assessments prepared by USEPA, OSHA, and NIOSH since 1972 were reviewed, along with related literature. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: None of the efforts to use statistical models to characterize relative cancer potencies for asbestos fiber types and sizes have been able to overcome limitations of the exposure data. Resulting uncertainties have been so great that these estimates should not be used to drive occupational and environmental health policy. The EPA has now rejected and discontinued work on its proposed methods for estimating potency factors. Future efforts will require new methods and more precise and reliable exposure assessments. However, while there may be genuine need for such work, a more pressing priority with regard to the six regulated forms of asbestos and other asbestiform fibers is to ban their production and use. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757446     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  3 in total

1.  Influence of exposure assessment and parameterization on exposure response. Aspects of epidemiologic cohort analysis using the Libby Amphibole asbestos worker cohort.

Authors:  Thomas F Bateson; Leonid Kopylev
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  The case for a global ban on asbestos.

Authors:  Joseph LaDou; Barry Castleman; Arthur Frank; Michael Gochfeld; Morris Greenberg; James Huff; Tushar Kant Joshi; Philip J Landrigan; Richard Lemen; Jonny Myers; Morando Soffritti; Colin L Soskolne; Ken Takahashi; Daniel Teitelbaum; Benedetto Terracini; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Ongoing downplaying of the carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos by vested interests.

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Arthur L Frank
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.646

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.