BACKGROUND: The main clinical consequence of sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopy and barium swallow X-ray are commonly used to diagnose SHH. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of endoscopy and X-ray in the diagnosis of SHH in morbidly obese patients before and after gastric bypass (GBP). METHODS: Ninety-two patients underwent reflux symptoms evaluation, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and barium swallow X-ray before and 6 months after banded GBP. The performance of endoscopy in diagnosing SHH was assessed, taking X-ray as reference. Endoscopy and X-ray were tested as predictors of SHH with GERD. RESULTS: SHH was more prevalent when characterized by X-ray than endoscopy either before (33% vs. 17%; P = 0.017) or after GBP (26% vs. 7%; P = 0.001). Endoscopy showed low sensitivity (<or=40%) and high specificity (>or=94%) in diagnosing SHH. Before GBP, more patients with SHH had GERD compared to patients without SHH using either X-ray (83% vs. 58%; P = 0.016) or endoscopy (94% vs. 61%; P = 0.009). After GBP, only patients with radiologic evidence of SHH showed higher prevalence of GERD compared to patients without SHH (50% vs. 26%; P = 0.037). SHH patients also reported weekly or daily vomit more often than patients without SHH (59% vs. 32%; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In morbidly obese patients, X-ray is superior to endoscopy in diagnosing SHH either before or after banded GBP. In patients treated with this technique, the utilization of X-ray may help in the management of reflux symptoms and frequent vomit.
BACKGROUND: The main clinical consequence of sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Endoscopy and barium swallow X-ray are commonly used to diagnose SHH. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of endoscopy and X-ray in the diagnosis of SHH in morbidly obesepatients before and after gastric bypass (GBP). METHODS: Ninety-two patients underwent reflux symptoms evaluation, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and barium swallow X-ray before and 6 months after banded GBP. The performance of endoscopy in diagnosing SHH was assessed, taking X-ray as reference. Endoscopy and X-ray were tested as predictors of SHH with GERD. RESULTS: SHH was more prevalent when characterized by X-ray than endoscopy either before (33% vs. 17%; P = 0.017) or after GBP (26% vs. 7%; P = 0.001). Endoscopy showed low sensitivity (<or=40%) and high specificity (>or=94%) in diagnosing SHH. Before GBP, more patients with SHH had GERD compared to patients without SHH using either X-ray (83% vs. 58%; P = 0.016) or endoscopy (94% vs. 61%; P = 0.009). After GBP, only patients with radiologic evidence of SHH showed higher prevalence of GERD compared to patients without SHH (50% vs. 26%; P = 0.037). SHH patients also reported weekly or daily vomit more often than patients without SHH (59% vs. 32%; P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In morbidly obesepatients, X-ray is superior to endoscopy in diagnosing SHH either before or after banded GBP. In patients treated with this technique, the utilization of X-ray may help in the management of reflux symptoms and frequent vomit.
Authors: Fernando Fornari; Antônio Carlos Gruber; Antônio de Barros Lopes; Dileta Cecchetti; Sérgio Gabriel Silva de Barros Journal: Arq Gastroenterol Date: 2005-03-29
Authors: Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kamran Samakar; Travis J McKenzie; Ali Tavakkoli; Ashley H Vernon; Malcolm K Robinson; Scott A Shikora Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Christian Lottrup; Hans Gregersen; Donghua Liao; Lotte Fynne; Jens Brøndum Frøkjær; Klaus Krogh; Julie Regan; Peter Kunwald; Barry P McMahon Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 7.527
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 12.045