Literature DB >> 19756808

On quantitative effects of RNA shape abstraction.

Markus E Nebel1, Anika Scheid.   

Abstract

Over the last few decades, much effort has been taken to develop approaches for identifying good predictions of RNA secondary structure. This is due to the fact that most computational prediction methods based on free energy minimization compute a number of suboptimal foldings and we have to identify the native folding among all these possible secondary structures. Using the abstract shapes approach as introduced by Giegerich et al. (Nucleic Acids Res 32(16):4843-4851, 2004), each class of similar secondary structures is represented by one shape and the native structures can be found among the top shape representatives. In this article, we derive some interesting results answering enumeration problems for abstract shapes and secondary structures of RNA. We compute precise asymptotics for the number of different shape representations of size n and for the number of different shapes showing up when abstracting from secondary structures of size n under a combinatorial point of view. A more realistic model taking primary structures into account remains an open challenge. We give some arguments why the present techniques cannot be applied in this case.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756808     DOI: 10.1007/s12064-009-0074-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theory Biosci        ISSN: 1431-7613            Impact factor:   1.919


  18 in total

1.  Complete suboptimal folding of RNA and the stability of secondary structures.

Authors:  S Wuchty; W Fontana; I L Hofacker; P Schuster
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  A statistical sampling algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Ye Ding; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Structural and functional aspects of RNA pseudoknots.

Authors:  E Dam; K Pleij; D Draper
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Sfold web server for statistical folding and rational design of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Ye Ding; Chi Yu Chan; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Investigation of the Bernoulli model for RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Markus E Nebel
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Prediction of RNA secondary structure, including pseudoknotting, by computer simulation.

Authors:  J P Abrahams; M van den Berg; E van Batenburg; C Pleij
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Higher order structural elements in ribosomal RNAs: pseudo-knots and the use of noncanonical pairs.

Authors:  R R Gutell; C R Woese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule.

Authors:  M Zuker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA.

Authors:  R Nussinov; A B Jacobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Shape based indexing for faster search of RNA family databases.

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Jens Reeder; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of a sophisticated SCFG design for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Markus E Nebel; Anika Scheid
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Pareto optimization in algebraic dynamic programming.

Authors:  Cédric Saule; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  Abstract folding space analysis based on helices.

Authors:  Jiabin Huang; Rolf Backofen; Björn Voß
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Lost in folding space? Comparing four variants of the thermodynamic model for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Christian Schudoma; Gerhard Steger; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Evaluating the effect of disturbed ensemble distributions on SCFG based statistical sampling of RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Anika Scheid; Markus E Nebel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Phenotype Bias Determines How Natural RNA Structures Occupy the Morphospace of All Possible Shapes.

Authors:  Kamaludin Dingle; Fatme Ghaddar; Petr Šulc; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Faster computation of exact RNA shape probabilities.

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Robert Giegerich
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Analysing RNA-kinetics based on folding space abstraction.

Authors:  Jiabin Huang; Björn Voß
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.