| Literature DB >> 19756725 |
Björn J Sieberer1, Henk Kieft, Tiny Franssen-Verheijen, Anne Mie C Emons, Jan W Vos.
Abstract
The microtubule cytoskeleton and the cell wall both play key roles in plant cell growth and division, determining the plant's final stature. At near weightlessness, tubulin polymerizes into microtubules in vitro, but these microtubules do not self-organize in the ordered patterns observed at 1g. Likewise, at near weightlessness cortical microtubules in protoplasts have difficulty organizing into parallel arrays, which are required for proper plant cell elongation. However, intact plants do grow in space and therefore should have a normally functioning microtubule cytoskeleton. Since the main difference between protoplasts and plant cells in a tissue is the presence of a cell wall, we studied single, but walled, tobacco BY-2 suspension-cultured cells during an 8-day space-flight experiment on board of the Soyuz capsule and the International Space Station during the 12S mission (March-April 2006). We show that the cortical microtubule density, ordering and orientation in isolated walled plant cells are unaffected by near weightlessness, as are the orientation of the cellulose microfibrils, cell proliferation, and cell shape. Likely, tissue organization is not essential for the organization of these structures in space. When combined with the fact that many recovering protoplasts have an aberrant cortical microtubule cytoskeleton, the results suggest a role for the cell wall, or its production machinery, in structuring the microtubule cytoskeleton.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19756725 PMCID: PMC2764053 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-009-1010-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Planta ISSN: 0032-0935 Impact factor: 4.116
TUBUL-2 experiment time line
| Time in hours before/after launch | Handling | Temperature |
|---|---|---|
| −124 to −120 h (−5 days) | Immobilization of 9 day old tobacco BY-2 culture in agarose and visual inspection of quality of cells in laboratory at Wageningen University | Room temp (~21°C) |
| −120 to −36 h | Temperature controlled storage and transport of living cells to Cosmodrome, Baikonur, Kazakhstan | 4°C |
| −36 to −24 h | Integration of cultures in PBUs and visual inspection of quality of cells (both in Wageningen and Baikonur) | Room temp |
| −24 to −18 h | Testing and integration of PBUs in the experiment containers and testing of the hardware by CCM. Integration of experiment containers in control setup in Wageningen | Room temp |
| −18 to −15 h | Testing and integration of experiment containers in the KUBIK incubator by the mission authorities (European Space Agency (ESA) and Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos)) | Room temp |
| −15 h | Power-up of KUBIK incubator in Baikonur and control setup in Wageningen | 21°C |
| 0 h | Launch of 12S mission from Cosmodrome Baikonur, Kazakhstan at 30/03/2006 08:30 local time | 21°C |
| 6 h | Fixation in PBU-01 at μ | 21°C |
| 12 h | Fixation in PBU-02 at μ | 21°C |
| 84 h | Medium refreshment in PBUs that still contain living cells (PBU-03–08) and ground controls (PBU-11–14) | 21°C |
| 132 h (5.5 days) | Fixation in PBU-03 and 04 at μ | 21°C |
| 193 h (8 days) | Fixation in PBU-05 and 06 at μ | 21°C |
| 210 h (9 days) | Removal of all PBUs from KUBIK and stowage in passive stowage pouches for sample download by Soyuz 11S | Ambient temp |
| 240 h (10 days) | Landing of 11S mission with TUBUL-2 and other experiment cassettes | Ambient temp |
| 240–288 h | Transport from landing site to Moscow in a portable refrigerator box. Storage of ground control samples in a refrigerator | 4°C |
| +288 h (12 days) | Inspection of PBUs by CCM, washing and processing of fixed, agarose-embedded cells (staining, embedding, immunolabeling) | Room temp (unless otherwise indicated) |
Sample treatments
| Experiment container label | Experiment container type | Position | Time of activation after launch | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium exchange | Fixation (h) | Post-fix wash (h) | |||
| TUB2-01 | IBE | μ | – | 6 | 6:45 |
| TUB2-02 | IBE | μ | – | 12 | 12:45 |
| TUB2-03 | IBEX | μ | 84 h | 132 | 132:45 |
| TUB2-04 | IBEX | μ | 84:30 h | 132:30 | 133:15 |
| TUB2-05 | IBEX | μ | 85 h | 193 | 193:45 |
| TUB2-06 | IBEX | μ | 86 h | 194 | 194:45 |
| TUB2-07 | IBEX | 1 | 85:30 h | 193:30 | 194:15 |
| TUB2-08 | IBEX | 1 | 86:30 h | 194:30 | 195:15 |
| TUB2-09 | IBE | 1 | – | 6 | 6:45 |
| TUB2-10 | IBE | 1 | – | 12 | 12:45 |
| TUB2-11 | IBEX | 1 | 84 h | 132 | 132:45 |
| TUB2-12 | IBEX | 1 | 84:30 h | 132:30 | 133:15 |
| TUB2-13 | IBEX | 1 | 85 h | 193 | 193:45 |
| TUB2-14 | IBEX | 1 | 85:30 h | 193:30 | 194:15 |
Fig. 1Cell proliferation and size. Bar graphs representing cell proliferation (a) as the mean of four growth compartments, mitotic index (b) as the total number per counted cells, mean cell length (c) and mean cell diameter (d) for the near weightlessness experiments and the 1g on-board and ground controls. The proliferation was exponential with a doubling time of around 87 h. The mean cell length and diameter did not statistically differ between the five time points or three gravity treatments. The numbers in the bars represent the number of cells that was measured for calculating the means, error bars represent standard deviation
Fig. 2Overview and cytoarchitecture of BY-2 cells that were chemically fixed at different time-points of the TUBUL flight and ground experiments. a Projection of an image stack of a calcofluor white stained cell cluster fixed after 5 days at near weightlessness and imaged with CLSM. The cells elongated and divided in all directions, independently of the direction of gravity. b FESEM micrograph of a cell cluster fixed after 8 days at 1g on Earth. c Cytoarchitecture of an interphase cell fixed 36 h before rocket launch. The samples in (d–f) were exposed to near weightlessness for 6 h (d), 12 h (e) and 193 h (f). The samples in g and h were exposed to 1g for 193 h on Earth (g) or in the on-board 1g centrifuge (h). The cells do not show obvious fixation artifacts; the thin cytoplasmic strands (arrows in c) radiating from the nucleus (arrowhead in c), and the cortical cytoplasm and outer membrane are well preserved. Furthermore, there are no evident differences in cytoarchitecture between the μg and 1g samples. The direction of the gravity vector in panels b, g and h is perpendicular to the field of view. The microbars in a and b are 100 μm; the microbar in c for the remaining panels is 20 μm
Fig. 3Cortical microtubules in interphase BY-2 cells that were chemically fixed at different time-points before and during the TUBUL flight and ground experiments. Cortical microtubules were labeled by whole-mount immunocytochemistry and visualized with CLSM at scanning steps of 1 μm. Microtubule arrays are presented as half-stack projections. a Cell fixed 36 h before rocket launch. Samples in (b–d) were exposed to near weightlessness for 6 h (b), 12 h (c) and 193 h (d). Samples in e and f were exposed to 1g for 193 h on Earth (e) or the on-board centrifuge (f). Cortical microtubules are present in all cells and their overall patterning is in parallel bundles, oriented transversely to the long axis of the cell. There are no obvious (qualitative) differences in microtubule orientation and density between cells exposed to μg or 1g. Magnification is the same in all images. The microbar is 50 μm for all panels
Fig. 4FESEM of the cell walls, comparing near weightlessness versus 1g conditions. Representative micrographs show the last deposited cellulose microfibrils after hypochlorite extraction of the cell content and cryo-sectioning of tobacco BY-2 cells grown for 8 days at near weightlessness (a and d), in the 1g ground control PBUs (b and e) and the on-board 1g control PBUs (c and f). The top row gives an overview of the cell that has been cut open; the bottom row gives a detail of the cellulose microfibrils in the area indicated with a black box in the top row micrographs. The last deposited cellulose microfibrils are aligned transverse to the cell’s longitudinal axis under all three experimental conditions (longitudinal cell axis indicated with arrows). The microbars are 10 μm (a–c) and 100 nm (d, e)